Low-Intensity Cutting Leads to Similar Forest Structure and Tree Diversity as in Protected Stands

IF 0.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY Polish Journal of Ecology Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI:10.3161/15052249PJE2020.68.2.004
D. Dobrowolska, Olga Orman, R. M. Tiwari
{"title":"Low-Intensity Cutting Leads to Similar Forest Structure and Tree Diversity as in Protected Stands","authors":"D. Dobrowolska, Olga Orman, R. M. Tiwari","doi":"10.3161/15052249PJE2020.68.2.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Forest structure in Europe has been shaped by forest management which may vary from intensive clearcuttings to single-tree selection cuttings. Most investigations on silver fir forests have been carried out in the mountains. Forests in lowlands have been less studied, although many of them are of natural origin. We investigated and assessed potential stand structural differences between managed and partially protected mixed silver fir stands. We also assessed the impact of silvicultural activities that led to the development of current stand structures of mixed Abies alba stands. The study was conducted in Janów Forests in south-eastern Poland. We randomly established 40 circular nested plots in three managed and three partially protected stands. Although both managed and partially protected stands differed in the intensity of management and the type of selection cuttings, we found little difference in the composition and stand structure. Regardless of management intensity all stands were characterized by diversified natural regeneration, where the main tree species, especially in the phase of seedlings, was silver fir. The basal area of standing dead trees was higher for the protected than managed stands, but the differences were not significant, whereas the mean volume of dead standing trees was significantly higher in the reserve. Both in managed and protected stands, silver fir benefited from the management measures mimicking natural processes. Our results suggest that low intensity forest management for silver fir dominated forests will be crucial for conserving these forests and their unique structure in the region.","PeriodicalId":49683,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Ecology","volume":"68 1","pages":"145 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3161/15052249PJE2020.68.2.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Forest structure in Europe has been shaped by forest management which may vary from intensive clearcuttings to single-tree selection cuttings. Most investigations on silver fir forests have been carried out in the mountains. Forests in lowlands have been less studied, although many of them are of natural origin. We investigated and assessed potential stand structural differences between managed and partially protected mixed silver fir stands. We also assessed the impact of silvicultural activities that led to the development of current stand structures of mixed Abies alba stands. The study was conducted in Janów Forests in south-eastern Poland. We randomly established 40 circular nested plots in three managed and three partially protected stands. Although both managed and partially protected stands differed in the intensity of management and the type of selection cuttings, we found little difference in the composition and stand structure. Regardless of management intensity all stands were characterized by diversified natural regeneration, where the main tree species, especially in the phase of seedlings, was silver fir. The basal area of standing dead trees was higher for the protected than managed stands, but the differences were not significant, whereas the mean volume of dead standing trees was significantly higher in the reserve. Both in managed and protected stands, silver fir benefited from the management measures mimicking natural processes. Our results suggest that low intensity forest management for silver fir dominated forests will be crucial for conserving these forests and their unique structure in the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低强度砍伐导致与保护林相似的森林结构和树木多样性
摘要欧洲的森林结构是由森林管理决定的,从密集的砍伐到单一的树木选择。大多数对银杉林的调查都是在山区进行的。低地的森林研究较少,尽管其中许多是自然起源的。我们调查和评估了管理和部分保护的混合银杉林之间潜在的林分结构差异。我们还评估了导致冷杉混合林分当前林分结构发展的造林活动的影响。这项研究是在波兰东南部的Janów森林进行的。我们在三个管理林分和三个部分保护林分中随机建立了40个圆形嵌套地块。尽管管理林分和部分保护林分在管理强度和选择插条类型方面存在差异,但我们发现在组成和林分结构方面几乎没有差异。无论管理强度如何,所有林分都具有多样化的自然再生特征,其中主要树种是银杉,尤其是在幼苗期。保护林的枯死树基面积高于管理林,但差异不显著,而保护区的平均枯死树量显著更高。在管理和保护林分中,银杉都受益于模仿自然过程的管理措施。我们的研究结果表明,银杉为主的森林的低强度森林管理对于保护这些森林及其在该地区的独特结构至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Ecology
Polish Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: POLISH JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY (formerly Ekologia polska) publishes original scientific research papers dealing with all aspects of ecology: both fundamental and applied, physiological ecology, evolutionary ecology, ecology of population, community, ecosystem, landscape as well as global ecology. There is no bias regarding taxons, ecosystems or geographical regions.
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric Analysis of Top Papers in Ecology Based on Essential Science Indicators during 2011–2021 Oviposition Preferences of the Alcon Large Blue Phengaris alcon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) at a Seasonal Lake in Southwestern Slovenia Diet of Adult Eagle Owl during Breeding Season in Northwestern Türkiye The Presence of Rabbit Warrens in an Agricultural Landscape is Related to Patch Features and Distance to a Highway Dynamics of Plant Litter Storage in a Subtropical Forest Headwater Stream During the Rainy Season
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1