Environmental Philanthropy and Civic Engagement: a Comparison of Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION China Nonprofit Review Pub Date : 2019-12-11 DOI:10.1163/18765149-12341368
Wenjuan Zheng, Zhenxiang Chen, Paul M. Ong
{"title":"Environmental Philanthropy and Civic Engagement: a Comparison of Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore","authors":"Wenjuan Zheng, Zhenxiang Chen, Paul M. Ong","doi":"10.1163/18765149-12341368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nUsing the data from the World Value Survey, this paper uses a comparative lens to assess environmental philanthropy by focusing on four predominantly Chinese societies – mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore, which contributes to the debate on whether culture can sufficiently explain cross-regional variation in civic engagement, particularly in the domain of environmental philanthropy. We find that residents in mainland China shared similar environmental concerns and beliefs with people from the other regions, but they are least likely to volunteer, donate, and demonstrate for these causes. After accounting for personal characteristics, the sizeable interregional gaps on pro-environmental behaviors remain. These findings are consistent with the argument that structural differences, particularly the developing nature of civil society in mainland China, hinders environmental civic engagement.","PeriodicalId":41661,"journal":{"name":"China Nonprofit Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"328-364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18765149-12341368","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Nonprofit Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765149-12341368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Using the data from the World Value Survey, this paper uses a comparative lens to assess environmental philanthropy by focusing on four predominantly Chinese societies – mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore, which contributes to the debate on whether culture can sufficiently explain cross-regional variation in civic engagement, particularly in the domain of environmental philanthropy. We find that residents in mainland China shared similar environmental concerns and beliefs with people from the other regions, but they are least likely to volunteer, donate, and demonstrate for these causes. After accounting for personal characteristics, the sizeable interregional gaps on pro-environmental behaviors remain. These findings are consistent with the argument that structural differences, particularly the developing nature of civil society in mainland China, hinders environmental civic engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境慈善与公民参与:中国大陆、台湾、香港和新加坡的比较
本文使用世界价值调查的数据,通过关注四个主要的中国社会——中国大陆、台湾、香港和新加坡,使用比较的视角来评估环境慈善事业,这有助于关于文化是否可以充分解释公民参与的跨区域差异的辩论,特别是在环境慈善领域。我们发现,中国大陆居民与其他地区的人有着相似的环境关注和信仰,但他们为这些事业做志愿者、捐赠和示威的可能性最小。在考虑个人特征后,亲环境行为的区域间差距仍然很大。这些发现与结构性差异,特别是中国大陆公民社会的发展性质,阻碍了环境公民参与的观点一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
China Nonprofit Review
China Nonprofit Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
期刊最新文献
Excluded from Political Task: NGO s’ Marginalized Participation in China’s Accurate Poverty Alleviation Project Retrospective Observations on “Legitimacy” of Charitable Fundraising amid COVID-19 Community Resilience: A New Theme in Modernizing Community-Level Governance System and Capability in China Regulating Emergency Volunteer Management to Promote the Development of Emergency Response Voluntary Services Is It a “Window of Opportunity” to Develop a New Normal of Government-Society Cooperation in Emergency Management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1