Transforming Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Precision Public Health: Open Guidelines for Manufacturers and Users.

Peter Lubell-Doughtie, Shiven Bhatt, Roger Wong, Anuraj H Shankar
{"title":"Transforming Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Precision Public Health: Open Guidelines for Manufacturers and Users.","authors":"Peter Lubell-Doughtie, Shiven Bhatt, Roger Wong, Anuraj H Shankar","doi":"10.2196/26800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precision public health (PPH) can maximize impact by targeting surveillance and interventions by temporal, spatial, and epidemiological characteristics. Although rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have enabled ubiquitous point-of-care testing in low-resource settings, their impact has been less than anticipated, owing in part to lack of features to streamline data capture and analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to transform the RDT into a tool for PPH by defining information and data axioms and an information utilization index (IUI); identifying design features to maximize the IUI; and producing open guidelines (OGs) for modular RDT features that enable links with digital health tools to create an RDT-OG system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed published papers and conducted a survey with experts or users of RDTs in the sectors of technology, manufacturing, and deployment to define features and axioms for information utilization. We developed an IUI, ranging from 0% to 100%, and calculated this index for 33 World Health Organization-prequalified RDTs. RDT-OG specifications were developed to maximize the IUI; the feasibility and specifications were assessed through developing malaria and COVID-19 RDTs based on OGs for use in Kenya and Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey respondents (n=33) included 16 researchers, 7 technologists, 3 manufacturers, 2 doctors or nurses, and 5 other users. They were most concerned about the proper use of RDTs (30/33, 91%), their interpretation (28/33, 85%), and reliability (26/33, 79%), and were confident that smartphone-based RDT readers could address some reliability concerns (28/33, 85%), and that readers were more important for complex or multiplex RDTs (33/33, 100%). The IUI of prequalified RDTs ranged from 13% to 75% (median 33%). In contrast, the IUI for an RDT-OG prototype was 91%. The RDT open guideline system that was developed was shown to be feasible by (1) creating a reference RDT-OG prototype; (2) implementing its features and capabilities on a smartphone RDT reader, cloud information system, and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources; and (3) analyzing the potential public health impact of RDT-OG integration with laboratory, surveillance, and vital statistics systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policy makers and manufacturers can define, adopt, and synergize with RDT-OGs and digital health initiatives. The RDT-OG approach could enable real-time diagnostic and epidemiological monitoring with adaptive interventions to facilitate control or elimination of current and emerging diseases through PPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":87288,"journal":{"name":"JMIR biomedical engineering","volume":" ","pages":"e26800"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/26800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Precision public health (PPH) can maximize impact by targeting surveillance and interventions by temporal, spatial, and epidemiological characteristics. Although rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have enabled ubiquitous point-of-care testing in low-resource settings, their impact has been less than anticipated, owing in part to lack of features to streamline data capture and analysis.

Objective: We aimed to transform the RDT into a tool for PPH by defining information and data axioms and an information utilization index (IUI); identifying design features to maximize the IUI; and producing open guidelines (OGs) for modular RDT features that enable links with digital health tools to create an RDT-OG system.

Methods: We reviewed published papers and conducted a survey with experts or users of RDTs in the sectors of technology, manufacturing, and deployment to define features and axioms for information utilization. We developed an IUI, ranging from 0% to 100%, and calculated this index for 33 World Health Organization-prequalified RDTs. RDT-OG specifications were developed to maximize the IUI; the feasibility and specifications were assessed through developing malaria and COVID-19 RDTs based on OGs for use in Kenya and Indonesia.

Results: The survey respondents (n=33) included 16 researchers, 7 technologists, 3 manufacturers, 2 doctors or nurses, and 5 other users. They were most concerned about the proper use of RDTs (30/33, 91%), their interpretation (28/33, 85%), and reliability (26/33, 79%), and were confident that smartphone-based RDT readers could address some reliability concerns (28/33, 85%), and that readers were more important for complex or multiplex RDTs (33/33, 100%). The IUI of prequalified RDTs ranged from 13% to 75% (median 33%). In contrast, the IUI for an RDT-OG prototype was 91%. The RDT open guideline system that was developed was shown to be feasible by (1) creating a reference RDT-OG prototype; (2) implementing its features and capabilities on a smartphone RDT reader, cloud information system, and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources; and (3) analyzing the potential public health impact of RDT-OG integration with laboratory, surveillance, and vital statistics systems.

Conclusions: Policy makers and manufacturers can define, adopt, and synergize with RDT-OGs and digital health initiatives. The RDT-OG approach could enable real-time diagnostic and epidemiological monitoring with adaptive interventions to facilitate control or elimination of current and emerging diseases through PPH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为精确公共卫生转变快速诊断测试:制造商和用户开放指南
精准公共卫生(PPH)可以根据时间、空间和流行病学特征对监测和干预措施进行针对性针对性,从而最大限度地发挥影响。尽管快速诊断测试(rdt)已经在资源匮乏的环境中实现了无处不在的护理点测试,但其影响不如预期,部分原因是缺乏简化数据捕获和分析的功能。我们的目标是通过定义信息和数据公理以及信息利用指数(IUI),将RDT转变为PPH的工具;识别设计特征以最大化IUI;并为模块化RDT功能制定开放指南(OGs),使其能够与数字健康工具联系起来,创建RDT- og系统。我们回顾了已发表的论文,并与技术、制造和部署领域的rdt专家或用户进行了调查,以定义信息利用的特征和公理。我们制定了一个IUI,范围从0%到100%,并为33个世界卫生组织预审合格的rdt计算了该指数。制定了RDT-OG规范,以最大限度地提高IUI;通过开发在肯尼亚和印度尼西亚使用的基于ogg的疟疾和COVID-19快速诊断测试,评估了可行性和规格。调查对象共33人,其中研究人员16人,技术人员7人,生产厂家3人,医生或护士2人,其他用户5人。他们最关心的是RDT的正确使用(30/ 33,91%),他们的解释(28/ 33,85%)和可靠性(26/ 33,79%),并且相信基于智能手机的RDT读取器可以解决一些可靠性问题(28/ 33,85%),并且读取器对于复杂或多重RDT更重要(33/ 33,100%)。预审rdt的IUI范围为13%至75%(中位数为33%)。相比之下,RDT-OG原型的IUI为91%。通过建立参考RDT- og原型,验证了所开发的RDT开放导流系统的可行性;(2)在智能手机RDT阅读器、云信息系统和快速医疗保健互操作性资源上实现其特性和功能;(3)分析RDT-OG与实验室、监测和生命统计系统集成的潜在公共卫生影响。政策制定者和制造商可以定义、采用RDT-OGs和数字卫生倡议,并与之协同工作。RDT-OG方法可以通过适应性干预措施实现实时诊断和流行病学监测,从而通过PPH促进控制或消除当前和新出现的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trends in South Korean Medical Device Development for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder: Narrative Review. Classifying Residual Stroke Severity Using Robotics-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: Machine Learning Approach. Assessing the Accuracy of Smartwatch-Based Estimation of Maximum Oxygen Uptake Using the Apple Watch Series 7: Validation Study. Agreement Between Apple Watch and Actical Step Counts in a Community Setting: Cross-Sectional Investigation From the Framingham Heart Study. Stroke Survivors' Interaction With Hand Rehabilitation Devices: Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1