Transforming Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Precision Public Health: Open Guidelines for Manufacturers and Users.

Peter Lubell-Doughtie, Shiven Bhatt, Roger Wong, Anuraj H Shankar
{"title":"Transforming Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Precision Public Health: Open Guidelines for Manufacturers and Users.","authors":"Peter Lubell-Doughtie, Shiven Bhatt, Roger Wong, Anuraj H Shankar","doi":"10.2196/26800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precision public health (PPH) can maximize impact by targeting surveillance and interventions by temporal, spatial, and epidemiological characteristics. Although rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have enabled ubiquitous point-of-care testing in low-resource settings, their impact has been less than anticipated, owing in part to lack of features to streamline data capture and analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to transform the RDT into a tool for PPH by defining information and data axioms and an information utilization index (IUI); identifying design features to maximize the IUI; and producing open guidelines (OGs) for modular RDT features that enable links with digital health tools to create an RDT-OG system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed published papers and conducted a survey with experts or users of RDTs in the sectors of technology, manufacturing, and deployment to define features and axioms for information utilization. We developed an IUI, ranging from 0% to 100%, and calculated this index for 33 World Health Organization-prequalified RDTs. RDT-OG specifications were developed to maximize the IUI; the feasibility and specifications were assessed through developing malaria and COVID-19 RDTs based on OGs for use in Kenya and Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey respondents (n=33) included 16 researchers, 7 technologists, 3 manufacturers, 2 doctors or nurses, and 5 other users. They were most concerned about the proper use of RDTs (30/33, 91%), their interpretation (28/33, 85%), and reliability (26/33, 79%), and were confident that smartphone-based RDT readers could address some reliability concerns (28/33, 85%), and that readers were more important for complex or multiplex RDTs (33/33, 100%). The IUI of prequalified RDTs ranged from 13% to 75% (median 33%). In contrast, the IUI for an RDT-OG prototype was 91%. The RDT open guideline system that was developed was shown to be feasible by (1) creating a reference RDT-OG prototype; (2) implementing its features and capabilities on a smartphone RDT reader, cloud information system, and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources; and (3) analyzing the potential public health impact of RDT-OG integration with laboratory, surveillance, and vital statistics systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policy makers and manufacturers can define, adopt, and synergize with RDT-OGs and digital health initiatives. The RDT-OG approach could enable real-time diagnostic and epidemiological monitoring with adaptive interventions to facilitate control or elimination of current and emerging diseases through PPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":87288,"journal":{"name":"JMIR biomedical engineering","volume":" ","pages":"e26800"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/26800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Precision public health (PPH) can maximize impact by targeting surveillance and interventions by temporal, spatial, and epidemiological characteristics. Although rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have enabled ubiquitous point-of-care testing in low-resource settings, their impact has been less than anticipated, owing in part to lack of features to streamline data capture and analysis.

Objective: We aimed to transform the RDT into a tool for PPH by defining information and data axioms and an information utilization index (IUI); identifying design features to maximize the IUI; and producing open guidelines (OGs) for modular RDT features that enable links with digital health tools to create an RDT-OG system.

Methods: We reviewed published papers and conducted a survey with experts or users of RDTs in the sectors of technology, manufacturing, and deployment to define features and axioms for information utilization. We developed an IUI, ranging from 0% to 100%, and calculated this index for 33 World Health Organization-prequalified RDTs. RDT-OG specifications were developed to maximize the IUI; the feasibility and specifications were assessed through developing malaria and COVID-19 RDTs based on OGs for use in Kenya and Indonesia.

Results: The survey respondents (n=33) included 16 researchers, 7 technologists, 3 manufacturers, 2 doctors or nurses, and 5 other users. They were most concerned about the proper use of RDTs (30/33, 91%), their interpretation (28/33, 85%), and reliability (26/33, 79%), and were confident that smartphone-based RDT readers could address some reliability concerns (28/33, 85%), and that readers were more important for complex or multiplex RDTs (33/33, 100%). The IUI of prequalified RDTs ranged from 13% to 75% (median 33%). In contrast, the IUI for an RDT-OG prototype was 91%. The RDT open guideline system that was developed was shown to be feasible by (1) creating a reference RDT-OG prototype; (2) implementing its features and capabilities on a smartphone RDT reader, cloud information system, and Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources; and (3) analyzing the potential public health impact of RDT-OG integration with laboratory, surveillance, and vital statistics systems.

Conclusions: Policy makers and manufacturers can define, adopt, and synergize with RDT-OGs and digital health initiatives. The RDT-OG approach could enable real-time diagnostic and epidemiological monitoring with adaptive interventions to facilitate control or elimination of current and emerging diseases through PPH.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为精确公共卫生转变快速诊断测试:制造商和用户开放指南
精准公共卫生(PPH)可以根据时间、空间和流行病学特征对监测和干预措施进行针对性针对性,从而最大限度地发挥影响。尽管快速诊断测试(rdt)已经在资源匮乏的环境中实现了无处不在的护理点测试,但其影响不如预期,部分原因是缺乏简化数据捕获和分析的功能。我们的目标是通过定义信息和数据公理以及信息利用指数(IUI),将RDT转变为PPH的工具;识别设计特征以最大化IUI;并为模块化RDT功能制定开放指南(OGs),使其能够与数字健康工具联系起来,创建RDT- og系统。我们回顾了已发表的论文,并与技术、制造和部署领域的rdt专家或用户进行了调查,以定义信息利用的特征和公理。我们制定了一个IUI,范围从0%到100%,并为33个世界卫生组织预审合格的rdt计算了该指数。制定了RDT-OG规范,以最大限度地提高IUI;通过开发在肯尼亚和印度尼西亚使用的基于ogg的疟疾和COVID-19快速诊断测试,评估了可行性和规格。调查对象共33人,其中研究人员16人,技术人员7人,生产厂家3人,医生或护士2人,其他用户5人。他们最关心的是RDT的正确使用(30/ 33,91%),他们的解释(28/ 33,85%)和可靠性(26/ 33,79%),并且相信基于智能手机的RDT读取器可以解决一些可靠性问题(28/ 33,85%),并且读取器对于复杂或多重RDT更重要(33/ 33,100%)。预审rdt的IUI范围为13%至75%(中位数为33%)。相比之下,RDT-OG原型的IUI为91%。通过建立参考RDT- og原型,验证了所开发的RDT开放导流系统的可行性;(2)在智能手机RDT阅读器、云信息系统和快速医疗保健互操作性资源上实现其特性和功能;(3)分析RDT-OG与实验室、监测和生命统计系统集成的潜在公共卫生影响。政策制定者和制造商可以定义、采用RDT-OGs和数字卫生倡议,并与之协同工作。RDT-OG方法可以通过适应性干预措施实现实时诊断和流行病学监测,从而通过PPH促进控制或消除当前和新出现的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conceptual Model for the Integration of Marketing Strategies and Biomedical Innovation in Patient-Centered Care: Mixed Methods Study. Noise-Resilient Bioacoustics Feature Extraction Methods and Their Implications on Audio Classification Performance: Systematic Review. Challenges and Solutions in Applying Large Language Models to Guideline-Based Management Planning and Automated Medical Coding in Health Care: Algorithm Development and Validation. Advancing Brain-Computer Interface Closed-Loop Systems for Neurorehabilitation: Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning Innovations in Biomedical Engineering. Thigh-Worn Sensor for Measuring Initial and Final Contact During Gait in a Mobility Impaired Population: Validation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1