Attrition in emergency department point-of-care ultrasound workflow adherence for the evaluation of cutaneous abscesses

S. Alerhand, Carl T. Mickman, K. Hu, Donald U. Apakama, J. Mishoe, B. Nelson
{"title":"Attrition in emergency department point-of-care ultrasound workflow adherence for the evaluation of cutaneous abscesses","authors":"S. Alerhand, Carl T. Mickman, K. Hu, Donald U. Apakama, J. Mishoe, B. Nelson","doi":"10.21037/jhmhp-20-85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many emergency departments (ED) have implemented software solutions for ordering, documenting, and interpreting point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) scans before healthcare bill generation. However, there are human and design barriers that prevent workflow completion. We sought to evaluate attrition in adherence to this step-wise workflow for evaluating cutaneous abscesses in a large urban ED, while quantifying missed potential revenue. Methods: Patient charts in 2017 with discharge diagnoses containing “abscess”, “boil”, or “cyst” were retrospectively extracted. Exclusion criteria included: POCUS not reasonably performed, abscess already draining, advanced imaging ordered, or consultant involvement. Each workflow step was assessed for completion. Revenue estimation was performed by multiplying number of scans by the appropriate relative value unit and medicare conversion factor. Results: Of 2,240 total charts, 710 abscesses (31.7%) met inclusion. Of those, 283 (39.8%) POCUS were performed, of which 213 (30.0%) were ordered, 198 (27.8%) interpreted, and 180 (25.3%) had images saved. Professional fees were billed for 120 POCUS examinations (16.9%). There were 66 payments collected (9.3%), amounting to $1,400.69 revenue. Estimated billing for the 120 POCUS was $2,546.71. If proper workflow had been implemented for all 283 POCUS performed, estimated revenue would have been $6,006.00. If POCUS had been performed with proper workflow for all 710 abscesses, estimated revenue would have been $15,068.05. Conclusions: POCUS workflow was interrupted at several points and completed sub-optimally. This attrition directly affected optimal patient care, documentation, and departmental revenue. Since cutaneous abscesses represent one of many ED POCUS applications, the extrapolated missed potential revenue would be much greater overall.","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-20-85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many emergency departments (ED) have implemented software solutions for ordering, documenting, and interpreting point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) scans before healthcare bill generation. However, there are human and design barriers that prevent workflow completion. We sought to evaluate attrition in adherence to this step-wise workflow for evaluating cutaneous abscesses in a large urban ED, while quantifying missed potential revenue. Methods: Patient charts in 2017 with discharge diagnoses containing “abscess”, “boil”, or “cyst” were retrospectively extracted. Exclusion criteria included: POCUS not reasonably performed, abscess already draining, advanced imaging ordered, or consultant involvement. Each workflow step was assessed for completion. Revenue estimation was performed by multiplying number of scans by the appropriate relative value unit and medicare conversion factor. Results: Of 2,240 total charts, 710 abscesses (31.7%) met inclusion. Of those, 283 (39.8%) POCUS were performed, of which 213 (30.0%) were ordered, 198 (27.8%) interpreted, and 180 (25.3%) had images saved. Professional fees were billed for 120 POCUS examinations (16.9%). There were 66 payments collected (9.3%), amounting to $1,400.69 revenue. Estimated billing for the 120 POCUS was $2,546.71. If proper workflow had been implemented for all 283 POCUS performed, estimated revenue would have been $6,006.00. If POCUS had been performed with proper workflow for all 710 abscesses, estimated revenue would have been $15,068.05. Conclusions: POCUS workflow was interrupted at several points and completed sub-optimally. This attrition directly affected optimal patient care, documentation, and departmental revenue. Since cutaneous abscesses represent one of many ED POCUS applications, the extrapolated missed potential revenue would be much greater overall.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科护理点超声工作流程依从性评估皮肤脓肿的损耗
背景:许多急诊科(ED)已经实施了软件解决方案,用于在医疗账单生成之前订购、记录和解释护理点超声(POCUS)扫描。但是,存在阻碍工作流完成的人为和设计障碍。我们试图根据这一循序渐进的工作流程来评估消耗,以评估大型城市ED中的皮肤脓肿,同时量化遗漏的潜在收入。方法:回顾性提取2017年出院诊断为“脓肿”、“疖子”或“囊肿”的病历。排除标准包括:POCUS检查不合理、脓肿已经引流、要求进行高级成像或顾问介入。对每个工作流程步骤的完成情况进行了评估。收入估算是通过将扫描次数乘以适当的相对价值单位和医疗保险转换系数来进行的。结果:在2240个病历中,710个脓肿(31.7%)符合纳入标准。其中,283例(39.8%)接受了POCUS检查,其中213例(30.0%)接受了检查,198例(27.8%)进行了解释,180例(25.3%)保存了图像。120次POCUS考试收取了专业费用(16.9%)。共收取了66笔费用(9.3%),收入为1400.69美元。120个POCUS的估计账单为2546.71美元。如果对所有283个POCUS实施了适当的工作流程,估计收入将为6006.00美元。如果对所有710例脓肿采用正确的工作流程进行POCUS,估计收入将为15068.05美元。结论:POCUS工作流程在几个点上中断,并以次优状态完成。这种流失直接影响了最佳的患者护理、文档和部门收入。由于皮肤脓肿是许多ED POCUS应用中的一种,因此推断出的潜在收入总体上会大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in hospital market concentration and profitability: the case of New Jersey COVID-19 outbreak and integration of social media in public health crisis communication: a case study of UMMC, Kuala Lumpur Spatial disparities in flood vulnerability in New York City Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth Impact of COVID-19 on operation room utilization efficiency and cardiac surgery care pathway: single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1