Comparison of the vertical jump performance of footballers with cerebral palsy at different competitive levels

Matías Henríquez, Kevin Campos-Campos, Raúl Smith, Sebastián Aliste, Sonny Riquelme, R. Reina
{"title":"Comparison of the vertical jump performance of footballers with cerebral palsy at different competitive levels","authors":"Matías Henríquez, Kevin Campos-Campos, Raúl Smith, Sebastián Aliste, Sonny Riquelme, R. Reina","doi":"10.5507/euj.2022.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Vertical jump (VJ) capacity is a common assessment for monitoring athletes' neuromuscular function and has been proposed as a differentiating indicator between competitive levels of football players. This study aimed to compare the VJ capacity of Chilean footballers with cerebral palsy (CP) with international and national levels of proficiency, also according to their sport classes (i.e., FT1 ‒ FT3). A total sample of 41 male footballers with CP were divided into international-level (n = 18) and national-level (n = 23) groups. All the participants performed two maximal squat jumps (SJs) and countermovement jumps (CMJs), where the best height obtained was registered. The VJ performance was significantly different between competitive levels, and players at international level had better scores ( p < .001) than the national level in SJ ( d g = 1.83, large) and CMJ ( d g = 2.08, large). Considering the sport classes, significant differences were found in SJ ( p = .024) and CMJ ( p = .035), in which FT3 players performed higher jumping heights than FT1 players ( d g = -.84 to -1.01, large). These results provide a deeper understanding of the differences in the motor impairment-specific performance of para-footballers with CP, where coaches and strength-conditioning professionals should consider VJ assessment for monitoring training and as a component for talent detection in this para-sport.","PeriodicalId":37918,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/euj.2022.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Vertical jump (VJ) capacity is a common assessment for monitoring athletes' neuromuscular function and has been proposed as a differentiating indicator between competitive levels of football players. This study aimed to compare the VJ capacity of Chilean footballers with cerebral palsy (CP) with international and national levels of proficiency, also according to their sport classes (i.e., FT1 ‒ FT3). A total sample of 41 male footballers with CP were divided into international-level (n = 18) and national-level (n = 23) groups. All the participants performed two maximal squat jumps (SJs) and countermovement jumps (CMJs), where the best height obtained was registered. The VJ performance was significantly different between competitive levels, and players at international level had better scores ( p < .001) than the national level in SJ ( d g = 1.83, large) and CMJ ( d g = 2.08, large). Considering the sport classes, significant differences were found in SJ ( p = .024) and CMJ ( p = .035), in which FT3 players performed higher jumping heights than FT1 players ( d g = -.84 to -1.01, large). These results provide a deeper understanding of the differences in the motor impairment-specific performance of para-footballers with CP, where coaches and strength-conditioning professionals should consider VJ assessment for monitoring training and as a component for talent detection in this para-sport.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同竞技水平下脑瘫足球运动员垂直起跳能力的比较
垂直起跳(VJ)能力是监测运动员神经肌肉功能的常用评估,并已被提出作为区分足球运动员竞技水平的指标。本研究旨在比较智利脑瘫(CP)足球运动员的VJ能力与国际和国内水平的熟练程度,也根据他们的运动课程(即FT1 - FT3)。将41名患有CP的男子足球运动员分为国际组(n = 18)和国家级组(n = 23)。所有参与者都进行了两次最大蹲跳(SJs)和反动作跳(CMJs),其中获得的最佳高度被记录下来。竞技水平之间的VJ表现存在显著差异,国际级运动员在SJ (d g = 1.83,大)和CMJ (d g = 2.08,大)上的得分高于国内水平(p < 0.001)。考虑到运动类别,SJ (p = 0.024)和CMJ (p = 0.035)存在显著差异,FT3运动员比FT1运动员跳高(d g = -)。84到-1.01,大)。这些结果提供了对患有CP的残疾人足球运动员运动损伤特异性表现差异的更深层次的理解,教练和力量训练专业人员应该考虑VJ评估来监测训练,并将其作为这项残疾人运动人才检测的一个组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity (EUJAPA) is an international, multidisciplinary journal, introduced to communicate, share and stimulate academic inquiry focusing on physical activity of persons with special needs. Articles appearing in EUJAPA reflect cross disciplinary nature of the academic discipline of adapted physical activity ranging from physical education, through sport, recreation, rehabilitation, dance, sport medicine or health care. EUJAPA is the official journal of the European Federation of Adapted Physical Activity. This multidisciplinary journal provides the latest academic inquiry related to physical activity for special populations. Regular features include qualitative and quantitative research studies, case studies, review articles, viewpoints, methodological guidelines, and editorial commentary.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Quality Participation through Dance Movement Therapy for Parkinson's Disease Elite performance in para-cycling: a scoping review Difference in balance capacity for Special Olympics athletes and non-athletes with intellectual disabilities Perceptions of patients with psychosis on living an active lifestyle Dynamics of courage: Personal learning processes in an adapted physical activity- based rehabilitation context, a single case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1