Information technology students’ involvement in in-class debates: Speech acts and modification of the illocutionary force

Q2 Arts and Humanities Discourse and Interaction Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.5817/di2022-2-28
Eva Ellederová
{"title":"Information technology students’ involvement in in-class debates: Speech acts and modification of the illocutionary force","authors":"Eva Ellederová","doi":"10.5817/di2022-2-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information technology (IT) professionals are a specific discourse community whose oral communication in English as a second language (ESL) predominates at all levels of workplace activities in the multinational IT sector. Since IT students’ pragmatic competence in performing communicative functions is essential for their effective communication in an academic setting and a global work environment, it is important to investigate this aspect of their language systematically and carefully. This paper focuses on IT students’ speech acts and the ways they modify the illocutionary force while participating in in-class debates. The analysis revealed that students used a wide range of speech acts and different metadiscourse markers for both increasing and reducing the illocutionary force. The ways IT students used boosters and hedges also reflect how they assume and share their professional knowledge and experience in their discourse community.","PeriodicalId":38177,"journal":{"name":"Discourse and Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse and Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/di2022-2-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information technology (IT) professionals are a specific discourse community whose oral communication in English as a second language (ESL) predominates at all levels of workplace activities in the multinational IT sector. Since IT students’ pragmatic competence in performing communicative functions is essential for their effective communication in an academic setting and a global work environment, it is important to investigate this aspect of their language systematically and carefully. This paper focuses on IT students’ speech acts and the ways they modify the illocutionary force while participating in in-class debates. The analysis revealed that students used a wide range of speech acts and different metadiscourse markers for both increasing and reducing the illocutionary force. The ways IT students used boosters and hedges also reflect how they assume and share their professional knowledge and experience in their discourse community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资讯科技学生在课堂辩论中的参与:言语行为与言外力量的改变
信息技术(IT)专业人士是一个特定的话语社区,他们以英语为第二语言(ESL)的口头交流在跨国IT部门的各级工作场所活动中占主导地位。由于IT学生在执行交际功能方面的语用能力对于他们在学术环境和全球工作环境中的有效沟通至关重要,因此系统而仔细地调查他们的语言这方面是很重要的。本文主要研究信息技术学生在参与课堂辩论时的言语行为及其对言外力量的修正方式。分析表明,学生使用了广泛的言语行为和不同的元话语标记来增加和减少非言力。IT学生使用助推器和模糊限制语的方式也反映了他们如何在话语社区中假设和分享他们的专业知识和经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Discourse and Interaction
Discourse and Interaction Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
First language and second language English editorialists’ use of interactional metadiscourse On the use of rhetorical questions in tweets related to the Russia-Ukrainian war: Podolyak vs Polyanskiy It’s complicated: The relationship between lexis, syntax and proficiency Refusal and politeness strategies favoured among Iraqi and Malaysian learners in marriage proposals The winner takes it all: Stance and engagement markers in successful project proposal abstracts funded by ERC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1