Towards a Tiered or Differentiated Approach to Protection of Traditional Knowledge (TK) and Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) in Relation to the Intellectual Property System

Chidi Oguamanam
{"title":"Towards a Tiered or Differentiated Approach to Protection of Traditional Knowledge (TK) and Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs) in Relation to the Intellectual Property System","authors":"Chidi Oguamanam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3412293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) has, for nearly two decades, engaged in formulating the nature and content of a text-based legal instrument or instruments for the effective protection of genetic resources (GRs), traditional knowledge (TK), and traditional cultural expressions (TCEs, also known as folklore) within or relating to the international intellectual property (IP) system. This task has been the job of WIPO’s Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC), established in 2000. In this article, I explore the context and rationales for, and evolution of, one of the IGC’s evolving contributions: development of a tiered or differentiated approach to the protection of TK and TCEs. The article discusses and analyses the empirical ramifications and challenges of the tiered approach — alternatively referred to as differentiated approach — with reference to examples of forms of TK and TCE in Africa, North America and Australia. I conclude that the approach is a work in progress, still evolving, which provides a useful broad policy framework at the international level while, at the same time, its details are contingent on many considerations better addressed at national and local levels.","PeriodicalId":33369,"journal":{"name":"The African Journal of Information and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The African Journal of Information and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3412293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) has, for nearly two decades, engaged in formulating the nature and content of a text-based legal instrument or instruments for the effective protection of genetic resources (GRs), traditional knowledge (TK), and traditional cultural expressions (TCEs, also known as folklore) within or relating to the international intellectual property (IP) system. This task has been the job of WIPO’s Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC), established in 2000. In this article, I explore the context and rationales for, and evolution of, one of the IGC’s evolving contributions: development of a tiered or differentiated approach to the protection of TK and TCEs. The article discusses and analyses the empirical ramifications and challenges of the tiered approach — alternatively referred to as differentiated approach — with reference to examples of forms of TK and TCE in Africa, North America and Australia. I conclude that the approach is a work in progress, still evolving, which provides a useful broad policy framework at the international level while, at the same time, its details are contingent on many considerations better addressed at national and local levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在知识产权制度下对传统知识和传统文化表现形式采取分层或差异化的保护方法
近二十年来,世界知识产权组织(WIPO)一直致力于制定一项或多项基于文本的法律文书的性质和内容,以便在国际知识产权(IP)体系内或与之相关的范围内有效保护遗传资源(gr)、传统知识(TK)和传统文化表现形式(tce,也称为民间传说)。这项任务一直是WIPO于2000年成立的知识产权与遗传资源、传统知识和民间文学文学政府间委员会(IGC)的工作。在本文中,我将探讨政府间委员会不断发展的贡献之一的背景、理由和演变:制定一种分层或差异化的方法来保护传统文化和传统文化。本文以非洲、北美和澳大利亚的传统知识和技术教育形式为例,讨论和分析了分层方法(或称为差异化方法)的经验后果和挑战。我的结论是,这种方法是一项正在进行的工作,仍在不断发展,它在国际一级提供了一个有用的广泛政策框架,同时,其细节取决于在国家和地方一级更好地处理的许多考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social Media Use, Disbelief and (Mis)information During a Pandemic: An Examination of Young Adult Nigerians’ Interactions with COVID-19 Public Health Messaging Intermediation Capabilities of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Ghana’s Agricultural Extension System Cybersecurity Policymaking in the BRICS Countries: From Addressing National Priorities to Seeking International Cooperation Applying Blockchain Technology to Security-Related Aspects of Electronic Healthcare Record Infrastructure A Sociocultural Framework to Analyse M-Learning Options for Early Childhood Development (ECD) Practitioner Training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1