Insights on co-creation in Mexico: challenges to its application of public-private partnerships

Noé K. Kouassi, Heidi Jane M. Smith, Rocío Huerta Cuervo
{"title":"Insights on co-creation in Mexico: challenges to its application of public-private partnerships","authors":"Noé K. Kouassi, Heidi Jane M. Smith, Rocío Huerta Cuervo","doi":"10.1080/12294659.2023.2202954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Co-creation has captured the attention of policy makers and public administrators, not only in developed countries, but also in emerging countries. Its objective is to grant a more central role to citizens/users in the policy process to create public value. While the theory continues to be relatively dispersed in the academic literature, there have been few empirical studies evaluating its applicability in improving public management processes. This article challenges the concept of co-creation by providing an analysis of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in Mexico. Theoretical reflections indicate that co-creation can improve social profitability of projects by proving a participative solution to inefficiencies that are characterized by PPPs. However, the institutional and organizational barriers that hinder a state’s development and progress to develop an effective bureaucracy are still prominent lacking, especially in the developing country context, where corruption is produce and not co-creation.","PeriodicalId":39993,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Public Administration","volume":"28 1","pages":"242 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2023.2202954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Co-creation has captured the attention of policy makers and public administrators, not only in developed countries, but also in emerging countries. Its objective is to grant a more central role to citizens/users in the policy process to create public value. While the theory continues to be relatively dispersed in the academic literature, there have been few empirical studies evaluating its applicability in improving public management processes. This article challenges the concept of co-creation by providing an analysis of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in Mexico. Theoretical reflections indicate that co-creation can improve social profitability of projects by proving a participative solution to inefficiencies that are characterized by PPPs. However, the institutional and organizational barriers that hinder a state’s development and progress to develop an effective bureaucracy are still prominent lacking, especially in the developing country context, where corruption is produce and not co-creation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥共同创造的见解:公私伙伴关系应用的挑战
共同创造不仅在发达国家,而且在新兴国家也引起了决策者和公共管理者的关注。它的目标是让公民/用户在政策制定过程中发挥更重要的作用,以创造公共价值。虽然该理论在学术文献中仍然相对分散,但很少有实证研究评估其在改善公共管理过程中的适用性。本文通过对墨西哥公私伙伴关系(ppp)的分析,对共同创造的概念提出了挑战。理论反思表明,共同创造为ppp模式下的低效率提供了一种参与式解决方案,从而提高了项目的社会盈利能力。然而,阻碍一个国家发展和发展有效官僚机构的制度和组织障碍仍然明显缺乏,特别是在发展中国家,腐败是产生的,而不是共同创造的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Public Administration
International Review of Public Administration Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Review of Public Administration (ISSN 1229-4659) is published biannually by the Korean Association for Public Administration (KAPA) to provide a worldwide audience with the opportunity for communication and further understanding on issues of public administration and policy. There will be a triple-blind peer review process for all submissions of articles of general interest. There are no particular limitations on subject areas as long as they are related to the field of public administration and policy or deal with public employees. Articles should be analytic and demonstrate the highest standards of excellence in conceptualization, craftsmanship, and methodology.
期刊最新文献
Curvilinear dynamics of job demands, resources, and resilience: the impact of HR practices on public managers Outsourcing and backsourcing in a time of crisis – experiences of double opportunism A systematic literature review of budget participation: foundations, trends, and ways forward How does the stringency of state tax and expenditure limitations influence opportunistic taxation? Rural and regional development in the age of digital platforms: platformization of the Japanese Furusato Nozei Hometown Tax Donation System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1