Age-related changes of ocular blood flow detecting by laser speckle flowgraphy

N. V. Neroeva, O. V. Zaytseva, T. D. Okhotsimskaya, N. Shvetsova, O. I. Markelova
{"title":"Age-related changes of ocular blood flow detecting by laser speckle flowgraphy","authors":"N. V. Neroeva, O. V. Zaytseva, T. D. Okhotsimskaya, N. Shvetsova, O. I. Markelova","doi":"10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-2-54-62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disorders of ocular perfusion are associated with huge amout of diseases, including such socially significant as diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. To date, there is no gold standard for measuring ocular perfusion. An innovative method for two-dimensional assessment of eye blood flow — laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) — has been developed recent years and implemented in ophthalmological practice.Purpose: to evaluate the possibilities of LSFG for determining ocular blood flow and to find out the age dependence of the obtained indicators of ocular blood flow.Materials and methods. The study includes 60 healthy volunteers. The examined persons were divided into 3 groups of 20 people depending on their age — 20–40 years old, 41–60 years old, and over 61 years old. All examined persons had high visual acuity and normal blood pressure. The study was carried out on an LSFG-RetFlow device (Nidek). The shape of the pulse wave, its qualitative and quantitative characteristics including the main parameter of LSFG - MBR (Mean Blur Rate) were determined.Results. A significant decrease with age of most studied parameters of blood flow volume was revealed, the changes were significant (p £ 0.05). The highest MBR parameters were noted in the group of 20–40 years old. In the macular area, MBR values decreased more significantly in the group after 60 years age, while for the optic nerve head (ONH), a decrease has been already noted after 40 years age. In average, the decrease was 25–34 % for the ONH area and 33–38 % for the macular area. Changes of the other parameters of the pulse waveform had a similar trend.Conclusion. LSFG is a reliable method for quantifying ocular blood flow. Our data support that LSFG-derived MBR and pulse wave measurements may be useful biomarkers for ocular perfusion changes. The identified age-related blood flow changes should be taken into account during the analysis of patients data.","PeriodicalId":36080,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskii Oftal''mologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskii Oftal''mologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-2-54-62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disorders of ocular perfusion are associated with huge amout of diseases, including such socially significant as diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. To date, there is no gold standard for measuring ocular perfusion. An innovative method for two-dimensional assessment of eye blood flow — laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) — has been developed recent years and implemented in ophthalmological practice.Purpose: to evaluate the possibilities of LSFG for determining ocular blood flow and to find out the age dependence of the obtained indicators of ocular blood flow.Materials and methods. The study includes 60 healthy volunteers. The examined persons were divided into 3 groups of 20 people depending on their age — 20–40 years old, 41–60 years old, and over 61 years old. All examined persons had high visual acuity and normal blood pressure. The study was carried out on an LSFG-RetFlow device (Nidek). The shape of the pulse wave, its qualitative and quantitative characteristics including the main parameter of LSFG - MBR (Mean Blur Rate) were determined.Results. A significant decrease with age of most studied parameters of blood flow volume was revealed, the changes were significant (p £ 0.05). The highest MBR parameters were noted in the group of 20–40 years old. In the macular area, MBR values decreased more significantly in the group after 60 years age, while for the optic nerve head (ONH), a decrease has been already noted after 40 years age. In average, the decrease was 25–34 % for the ONH area and 33–38 % for the macular area. Changes of the other parameters of the pulse waveform had a similar trend.Conclusion. LSFG is a reliable method for quantifying ocular blood flow. Our data support that LSFG-derived MBR and pulse wave measurements may be useful biomarkers for ocular perfusion changes. The identified age-related blood flow changes should be taken into account during the analysis of patients data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光散斑血流图检测眼血流量的年龄变化
眼部灌注障碍与大量疾病有关,包括糖尿病视网膜病变和青光眼等具有社会意义的疾病。到目前为止,还没有测量眼部灌注的黄金标准。近年来,人们开发了一种用于二维评估眼睛血流的创新方法——激光散斑血流图(LSFG),并在眼科实践中实施。目的:评价LSFG测定眼血流量的可能性,并找出所获得的眼血流量指标的年龄依赖性。材料和方法。这项研究包括60名健康志愿者。受试者根据年龄分为3组,每组20人——20-40岁、41-60岁和61岁以上。所有接受检查的人都有很高的视力和正常的血压。该研究是在LSFG RetFlow装置(Nidek)上进行的。确定了脉搏波的形状、定性和定量特征,包括LSFG-MBR(平均模糊率)的主要参数。后果大多数研究的血流量参数随着年龄的增长而显著下降,变化显著(p£0.05)。20–40岁组的MBR参数最高。在黄斑区,60岁后组的MBR值下降更为显著,而在视神经头(ONH),40岁后已经注意到下降。ONH区域和黄斑区域的平均降幅分别为25-34%和33-38%。脉冲波形的其他参数的变化具有类似的趋势。结论LSFG是一种可靠的眼部血流定量方法。我们的数据支持LSFG衍生的MBR和脉搏波测量可能是眼部灌注变化的有用生物标志物。在分析患者数据时,应考虑已确定的与年龄相关的血流变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Telemedicine for glaucoma: the state-of-the-art and trends of development Modifying treatment of degenerative retinal diseases. Part 2. Conditioning therapy techniques and the problem of maximizing retinal plasticity Ocular proton therapy: state-of-the-art Methodological aspects of statistical analysis in ophthalmology Keratoprostheses: from the past to the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1