Revising Resoluteness: Confronting the Moral Problem of Others in Being and Time

IF 1.1 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-09-15 DOI:10.1080/00071773.2021.1977090
Min Seol
{"title":"Revising Resoluteness: Confronting the Moral Problem of Others in Being and Time","authors":"Min Seol","doi":"10.1080/00071773.2021.1977090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Heidegger’s Being and Time has been criticized for its lack of moral concern toward others. I address this problem by reviewing and developing several revisionist interpretations. I call these the historicist, sympathy-oriented, and ontological approaches to the moral problem of others. First, I develop the ontological approach and propose to reinterpret being authentic as proper to our essence. Second, I use Heidegger’s idea in Being and Time that our essence lies in disclosure to suggest that we comprehend resoluteness as being proper to both world- and self-disclosure. Then I revise Heidegger’s definition of resoluteness to argue that our world-disclosure requires us to help others recover their authentic selves, and that this is what Heidegger is gesturing toward when he writes about “leaping ahead”. Third, I briefly assess the ethical implications of “leaping ahead” and conclude that it does not allow us to treat others as mere objects.","PeriodicalId":44348,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY","volume":"53 1","pages":"298 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2021.1977090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Heidegger’s Being and Time has been criticized for its lack of moral concern toward others. I address this problem by reviewing and developing several revisionist interpretations. I call these the historicist, sympathy-oriented, and ontological approaches to the moral problem of others. First, I develop the ontological approach and propose to reinterpret being authentic as proper to our essence. Second, I use Heidegger’s idea in Being and Time that our essence lies in disclosure to suggest that we comprehend resoluteness as being proper to both world- and self-disclosure. Then I revise Heidegger’s definition of resoluteness to argue that our world-disclosure requires us to help others recover their authentic selves, and that this is what Heidegger is gesturing toward when he writes about “leaping ahead”. Third, I briefly assess the ethical implications of “leaping ahead” and conclude that it does not allow us to treat others as mere objects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修正刚毅:面对他人存在与时间的道德问题
海德格尔的《存在与时间》因缺乏对他人的道德关怀而受到批评。我通过回顾和发展几个修正主义的解释来解决这个问题。我把这些方法称为历史决定论的、以同情为导向的、以及对他人道德问题的本体论方法。首先,我发展了本体论的方法,并建议将“真实”重新解释为符合我们的本质。其次,我用海德格尔在《存在与时间》中关于我们的本质在于揭示的观点来暗示我们理解的决定论既适合于世界揭示,也适合于自我揭示。然后,我修改了海德格尔对决心的定义,认为我们的世界揭露要求我们帮助他人恢复他们真实的自我,这就是海德格尔在写“向前跳跃”时所暗示的。第三,我简要地评估了“跃进”的伦理含义,并得出结论,它不允许我们将他人仅仅视为物体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Husserl’s Notion of Solitary Speech Reconsidered: In Conversation with Vygotsky What Makes Natural Language “Natural”? A Phenomenological Proposal Infinity, Ideality, Transcendentality: The Idea in the Kantian Sense in Husserl and Derrida Sartre on Action: Decentring the Will Ontologically Interactive Painting: On Susan Rothenberg’s Three Heads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1