Dispossession, Border and Exception in South Asia: An Introduction

IF 1.5 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Borderlands Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1080/08865655.2023.2226404
Nasreen Chowdhory, B. Mohanty
{"title":"Dispossession, Border and Exception in South Asia: An Introduction","authors":"Nasreen Chowdhory, B. Mohanty","doi":"10.1080/08865655.2023.2226404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Dispossession can be examined from various vantage points across disciplines. Dispossession is a condition that overturns self-sufficiency by forcing individuals and communities to be dependent. The dependency remains on a \"mode of governance and a legal regime that confers and sustains those rights” (Butler 2013, 4). Being dispossessed indicate that the subjects are disowned and degraded by normalising powers active in the society, where the subjects are differentiated. The differentiation is manifested in varied conceptions of development and under-development, of dislocated and \"counter-hegemonic subjects.\" This epistemic distinctions remains the basis for spaces of border formation. However, dispossession is a layered activity that involves multiple actors. It is imperative to unpack layers of dispossession to unravel complex border formation. Thus taking dispossession as the central category of analysis, the contributors in the special issue have examined the complex and layered relationship between dispossession and (b)ordering processes to demonstrate overlapping dominations and subjugations: at (in)security, psycho-social, cultural, political, and economic realms. It attempts to unravel mechanisms of contentious politics of dispossession and the “narratives of encounters” of collective imaginations within a relational framework. In the process, it tries to unfold historical processes and political dynamics of exclusion that constitutes internal and external border practices in acts of dispossession.","PeriodicalId":45999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Borderlands Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Borderlands Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2023.2226404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Dispossession can be examined from various vantage points across disciplines. Dispossession is a condition that overturns self-sufficiency by forcing individuals and communities to be dependent. The dependency remains on a "mode of governance and a legal regime that confers and sustains those rights” (Butler 2013, 4). Being dispossessed indicate that the subjects are disowned and degraded by normalising powers active in the society, where the subjects are differentiated. The differentiation is manifested in varied conceptions of development and under-development, of dislocated and "counter-hegemonic subjects." This epistemic distinctions remains the basis for spaces of border formation. However, dispossession is a layered activity that involves multiple actors. It is imperative to unpack layers of dispossession to unravel complex border formation. Thus taking dispossession as the central category of analysis, the contributors in the special issue have examined the complex and layered relationship between dispossession and (b)ordering processes to demonstrate overlapping dominations and subjugations: at (in)security, psycho-social, cultural, political, and economic realms. It attempts to unravel mechanisms of contentious politics of dispossession and the “narratives of encounters” of collective imaginations within a relational framework. In the process, it tries to unfold historical processes and political dynamics of exclusion that constitutes internal and external border practices in acts of dispossession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南亚的处置、边界与例外:导论
摘要处置可以从不同学科的不同角度进行研究。处置是一种通过强迫个人和社区依赖来推翻自给自足的条件。这种依赖仍然取决于“赋予和维持这些权利的治理模式和法律制度”(Butler 2013,4反霸权主义主体。“这种认识上的区别仍然是边界形成空间的基础。然而,剥夺是一种涉及多个参与者的分层活动。必须解开剥夺的层次,以解开复杂的边界形成。因此,将剥夺作为分析的中心类别,特刊的撰稿人研究了复杂和分层的关系剥夺和(b)命令过程,以展示重叠的统治和征服:在安全、心理社会、文化、政治和经济领域。它试图在关系框架内解开有争议的剥夺政治机制和集体想象的“遭遇叙事”。在这一过程中,它试图揭示历史进程和排斥的政治动态,这种排斥构成了剥夺行为中的内部和外部边界做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Convergence in European Cross-Border Structures: The Case of Spanish Euroregions The inconspicuous power of border festivals: insights from the Chad-Cameroon border Migration patterns across the mediterranean exchanges, conflicts and coexistence Migration patterns across the mediterranean exchanges, conflicts and coexistence , ed. by Adelina Miranda and Antía Pérez-Caramés, 2023, Edward Elgar, Massachusetts, 222 pages, $125, ISBN: 978 1 80088 734 3 Methodological Perspectives on Smuggling: The GDL-Prussia Borderlands in the Late Eighteenth Century The e-Walls of Brexit: Digital Adjustments in Customs Programs Between France, Belgium and the United Kingdom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1