Exploring task features that predict psychometric quality of test items: the case for the Dutch driving theory exam

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Testing Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI:10.1080/15305058.2021.1916506
E. Roelofs, Wilco H M Emons, Angela J. Verschoor
{"title":"Exploring task features that predict psychometric quality of test items: the case for the Dutch driving theory exam","authors":"E. Roelofs, Wilco H M Emons, Angela J. Verschoor","doi":"10.1080/15305058.2021.1916506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study reports on an Evidence Centered Design (ECD) project in the Netherlands, involving the theory exam for prospective car drivers. In particular, we illustrate how cognitive load theory, task-analysis, response process models, and explanatory item-response theory can be used to systematically develop and refine task models. Based on a cognitive model for driving, 353 existing items involving rules of priority at intersections, were coded on intrinsic task features and task presentation features. Hierarchical regression analyses were carried out to determine the contribution of task features to item difficulty and item discrimination. A substantial proportion of variance in both item difficulty and item discrimination parameters could be explained by intrinsic task-features, including rules and signs (25%, 18.6%), task-intersection features (13.4%, 14.1%), and a smaller small proportion to item presentation features (3.5%, 7.1%) of the total variance. It is concluded that the systematic approach of discerning task features and determining the impact on item parameters has added value as an ECD-tool for evaluating existing assessments that are planned to be innovated. The paper concludes with a discussion of practical implications.","PeriodicalId":46615,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Testing","volume":"21 1","pages":"80 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15305058.2021.1916506","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2021.1916506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study reports on an Evidence Centered Design (ECD) project in the Netherlands, involving the theory exam for prospective car drivers. In particular, we illustrate how cognitive load theory, task-analysis, response process models, and explanatory item-response theory can be used to systematically develop and refine task models. Based on a cognitive model for driving, 353 existing items involving rules of priority at intersections, were coded on intrinsic task features and task presentation features. Hierarchical regression analyses were carried out to determine the contribution of task features to item difficulty and item discrimination. A substantial proportion of variance in both item difficulty and item discrimination parameters could be explained by intrinsic task-features, including rules and signs (25%, 18.6%), task-intersection features (13.4%, 14.1%), and a smaller small proportion to item presentation features (3.5%, 7.1%) of the total variance. It is concluded that the systematic approach of discerning task features and determining the impact on item parameters has added value as an ECD-tool for evaluating existing assessments that are planned to be innovated. The paper concludes with a discussion of practical implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索预测测试项目心理测量质量的任务特征:以荷兰驾驶理论考试为例
摘要本研究报告了荷兰的一个以证据为中心的设计(ECD)项目,该项目涉及未来汽车驾驶员的理论考试。特别是,我们说明了如何使用认知负荷理论、任务分析、反应过程模型和解释性项目反应理论来系统地开发和完善任务模型。基于驾驶认知模型,对353个涉及十字路口优先规则的现有项目进行了内在任务特征和任务呈现特征编码。进行了层次回归分析,以确定任务特征对项目难度和项目辨别的贡献。项目难度和项目辨别参数的差异很大一部分可以由内在任务特征来解释,包括规则和符号(25%,18.6%)、任务交叉特征(13.4%,14.1%),以及占总方差的较小比例的项目呈现特征(3.5%,7.1%)。结论是,识别任务特征和确定对项目参数的影响的系统方法作为评估计划创新的现有评估的ECD工具具有附加值。论文最后讨论了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Testing
International Journal of Testing SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Combining Mokken Scale Analysis with and rasch measurement theory to explore differences in measurement quality between subgroups Examining the construct validity of the MIDUS version of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) Beyond group comparisons: Accounting for intersectional sources of bias in international survey measures Can the dark core of personality be measured briefly, multidimensionally, and invariantly? The D25 measure Investigating the acquiescent responding impact in empathy measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1