Rhetorical structure parallels research topic in LIS articles: a temporal bibliometrics examination

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Aslib Journal of Information Management Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1108/ajim-08-2022-0370
Wen Lou, Jiangen He, Qianqian Xu, Zhijie Zhu, Qiwen Lu, Yongjun Zhu
{"title":"Rhetorical structure parallels research topic in LIS articles: a temporal bibliometrics examination","authors":"Wen Lou, Jiangen He, Qianqian Xu, Zhijie Zhu, Qiwen Lu, Yongjun Zhu","doi":"10.1108/ajim-08-2022-0370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe effectiveness of rhetorical structure is essential to communicate key messages in research articles (RAs). The interdisciplinary nature of library and information science (LIS) has led to unclear patterns and practice of using rhetorical structures. Understanding how RAs are constructed in LIS to facilitate effective scholarly communication is important. Numerous studies investigated the rhetorical structure of RAs in a range of disciplines, but LIS articles have not been well studied.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, the authors encoded rhetorical structures to 2,216 articles in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology covering a period from 2001 to 2018 with the approaches of co-word analysis and visualization. The results show that the predominant rhetorical structures used by LIS researchers follow the sequence of Introduction-Literature Review-Methodology-Result-Discussion-Conclusion (ILMRDC).FindingsThe authors' temporal examination reveals the shifts of evolutionary pattern of rhetorical structure in 2008 and 2014. More importantly, the authors' study demonstrates that rhetorical structures have varied greatly across research areas in LIS community. For example, scholarly communication and scientometrics studies tend to exclude literature review in articles.Originality/valueThe present paper offers a first systematic examination of how rhetorical structures are used in a representative sample of a LIS journal, especially from a temporal perspective.","PeriodicalId":53152,"journal":{"name":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-08-2022-0370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe effectiveness of rhetorical structure is essential to communicate key messages in research articles (RAs). The interdisciplinary nature of library and information science (LIS) has led to unclear patterns and practice of using rhetorical structures. Understanding how RAs are constructed in LIS to facilitate effective scholarly communication is important. Numerous studies investigated the rhetorical structure of RAs in a range of disciplines, but LIS articles have not been well studied.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, the authors encoded rhetorical structures to 2,216 articles in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology covering a period from 2001 to 2018 with the approaches of co-word analysis and visualization. The results show that the predominant rhetorical structures used by LIS researchers follow the sequence of Introduction-Literature Review-Methodology-Result-Discussion-Conclusion (ILMRDC).FindingsThe authors' temporal examination reveals the shifts of evolutionary pattern of rhetorical structure in 2008 and 2014. More importantly, the authors' study demonstrates that rhetorical structures have varied greatly across research areas in LIS community. For example, scholarly communication and scientometrics studies tend to exclude literature review in articles.Originality/valueThe present paper offers a first systematic examination of how rhetorical structures are used in a representative sample of a LIS journal, especially from a temporal perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LIS文章中修辞结构与研究主题的相似性:时间文献计量学检验
目的修辞结构的有效性对于研究文章中关键信息的传达至关重要。图书馆和信息科学的跨学科性质导致了修辞结构的使用模式和实践不明确。了解如何在LIS中构建RA以促进有效的学术交流非常重要。许多研究在一系列学科中调查了RA的修辞结构,但LIS的文章并没有得到很好的研究。设计/方法论/方法在本研究中,作者采用共词分析和可视化的方法,对《信息科学与技术协会杂志》2001年至2018年的2216篇文章的修辞结构进行了编码。结果表明,LIS研究者使用的主要修辞结构遵循引言、文献综述、方法论、结果讨论结论(ILMRDC)的顺序。更重要的是,作者的研究表明,在LIS社区的各个研究领域,修辞结构有很大的差异。例如,学术交流和科学计量学研究倾向于在文章中排除文献综述。原创性/价值本文首次系统地考察了修辞结构是如何在LIS期刊的代表性样本中使用的,尤其是从时间的角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Aslib Journal of Information Management COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
19.20%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Aslib Journal of Information Management covers a broad range of issues in the field, including economic, behavioural, social, ethical, technological, international, business-related, political and management-orientated factors. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work. Aslib Journal of Information Management Areas of interest include topics such as social media, data protection, search engines, information retrieval, digital libraries, information behaviour, intellectual property and copyright, information industry, digital repositories and information policy and governance.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of team engagement on patient satisfaction: insights from social support and transactive memory system Factors affecting user intention to use social commerce continuously from a habit perspective What decision-making process do mHealth users go through when faced with privacy disclosure behaviors? A dual trade-off perspective Collaborative online shopping: customer satisfaction and the influence of product type, gender and involvement An associative text analyzer to facilitate effectiveness of exploring historical texts for digital humanities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1