Psychometric Evaluation of the Preschool Early Numeracy Skills Test–Brief Version Within the Item Response Theory Framework

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI:10.1111/emip.12536
Nikolaos Tsigilis, Katerina Krousorati, Athanasios Gregoriadis, Vasilis Grammatikopoulos
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Preschool Early Numeracy Skills Test–Brief Version Within the Item Response Theory Framework","authors":"Nikolaos Tsigilis,&nbsp;Katerina Krousorati,&nbsp;Athanasios Gregoriadis,&nbsp;Vasilis Grammatikopoulos","doi":"10.1111/emip.12536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Preschool Early Numeracy Skills Test–Brief Version (PENS-B) is a measure of early numeracy skills, developed and mainly used in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the factorial validity and measurement invariance across gender of PENS-B in the Greek educational context. PENS-B was administered to 906 preschool children (473 boys, 433 girls), randomly selected from 84 kindergarten classrooms. A 2PL unidimensional and multidimensional item response theory analysis, using cross-validation procedures, were used to analyze the data. Results showed that responses to 20 items can be adequately explained by a two-dimensional model (Numbering Relations and Arithmetic Operations). Application of differential item functioning procedures did not detect any gender bias. Numeracy Relation comprises 16 items, which assess low levels of this latent trait. On the other hand, four items capture average levels of Arithmetic Operations. Total information curves revealed that both dimensions measure with precision only a small area of their underlying latent trait.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emip.12536","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Preschool Early Numeracy Skills Test–Brief Version (PENS-B) is a measure of early numeracy skills, developed and mainly used in the United States. The purpose of this study was to examine the factorial validity and measurement invariance across gender of PENS-B in the Greek educational context. PENS-B was administered to 906 preschool children (473 boys, 433 girls), randomly selected from 84 kindergarten classrooms. A 2PL unidimensional and multidimensional item response theory analysis, using cross-validation procedures, were used to analyze the data. Results showed that responses to 20 items can be adequately explained by a two-dimensional model (Numbering Relations and Arithmetic Operations). Application of differential item functioning procedures did not detect any gender bias. Numeracy Relation comprises 16 items, which assess low levels of this latent trait. On the other hand, four items capture average levels of Arithmetic Operations. Total information curves revealed that both dimensions measure with precision only a small area of their underlying latent trait.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
项目反应理论框架下学前儿童早期算术技能测试的心理测量评价
学前早期算术技能测试-简要版(PENS-B)是早期算术技能的衡量标准,主要在美国开发和使用。本研究的目的是检验希腊教育背景下PENS-B在性别上的析因效度和测量不变性。在84个幼儿园教室中随机抽取906名学龄前儿童(男孩473名,女孩433名)进行pen - b研究。采用交叉验证程序,采用单维度和多维项目反应理论分析对数据进行分析。结果表明,对20个问题的回答可以用一个二维模型(编号关系和算术运算)来充分解释。差异项目功能程序的应用没有发现任何性别偏见。计算关系包括16个项目,这些项目评估了这种潜在特质的低水平。另一方面,有四个项目捕获了算术运算的平均水平。总信息曲线显示,这两个维度只能精确测量潜在特征的一小部分区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
The Past, Present, and Future of Large‐Scale Assessment Consortia Commentary: Where Does Classroom Assessment Fit in Educational Measurement? Commentary: A Data‐Driven Analysis of Recent Job Posts to Evaluate the Foundational Competencies Commentary: Past, Present, and Future of Educational Measurement Commentary: How Research and Testing Companies can Support Early‐Career Measurement Professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1