Multi-criteria Decision Making Using Hybrid methods for Supplier Selection in the Clothing Industry

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.2478/ftee-2022-0004
Mourad Lahdhiri, A. Babay, Mohamed Jmali
{"title":"Multi-criteria Decision Making Using Hybrid methods for Supplier Selection in the Clothing Industry","authors":"Mourad Lahdhiri, A. Babay, Mohamed Jmali","doi":"10.2478/ftee-2022-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Supplier selection and evaluation are among the most critical issues in supply chain management, affecting companies’ performance because of the important role of suppliers in the chain’s profitability. For this reason, it is important for companies to have an objective methodology to evaluate and choose an appropriate supplier based on convenient criteria in a competitive market. Determination of a convenient supplier selection is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In the literature, several applications of the MCDM methods for supplier evaluation and selection can be found; however, research studies in the clothing industry are still limited. Indeed, apparel supply chain managers have to consider their supplier-related decisions to reduce risks affecting the company’s performance. This study aims to fill this gap by providing apparel manufacturers with different hybrid models for selecting the best supplier. According to a literature review and questionnaire conducted, the main criteria related to supplier selection were identified and determined. Then, the analytic hierarchy process method was performed to determine the criteria’s weights, and then suppliers were ranked using hybrid multicriteria decision-making models (AHP-TOPSIS, AHP-WSM, and AHP-WPM) to select the suitable one in the apparel chain. This research methodology can be considered useful for apparel companies and other industries.","PeriodicalId":12309,"journal":{"name":"Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe","volume":"30 1","pages":"23 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ftee-2022-0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Supplier selection and evaluation are among the most critical issues in supply chain management, affecting companies’ performance because of the important role of suppliers in the chain’s profitability. For this reason, it is important for companies to have an objective methodology to evaluate and choose an appropriate supplier based on convenient criteria in a competitive market. Determination of a convenient supplier selection is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In the literature, several applications of the MCDM methods for supplier evaluation and selection can be found; however, research studies in the clothing industry are still limited. Indeed, apparel supply chain managers have to consider their supplier-related decisions to reduce risks affecting the company’s performance. This study aims to fill this gap by providing apparel manufacturers with different hybrid models for selecting the best supplier. According to a literature review and questionnaire conducted, the main criteria related to supplier selection were identified and determined. Then, the analytic hierarchy process method was performed to determine the criteria’s weights, and then suppliers were ranked using hybrid multicriteria decision-making models (AHP-TOPSIS, AHP-WSM, and AHP-WPM) to select the suitable one in the apparel chain. This research methodology can be considered useful for apparel companies and other industries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服装行业供应商选择的混合方法多准则决策
摘要供应商的选择和评估是供应链管理中最关键的问题之一,由于供应商在供应链盈利能力中的重要作用,影响着企业的绩效。因此,对于公司来说,重要的是要有一个客观的方法,在竞争激烈的市场中,根据方便的标准来评估和选择合适的供应商。确定一个方便的供应商选择是一个多准则决策问题。在文献中,可以找到MCDM方法在供应商评估和选择中的几个应用;然而,对服装行业的研究仍然有限。事实上,服装供应链经理必须考虑与供应商相关的决策,以降低影响公司业绩的风险。本研究旨在通过为服装制造商提供不同的混合模式来选择最佳供应商,从而填补这一空白。根据文献综述和问卷调查,确定了与供应商选择相关的主要标准。然后,采用层次分析法确定准则的权重,然后使用混合多准则决策模型(AHP-TOPSIS、AHP-WSM和AHP-WPM)对供应商进行排序,以在服装链中选择合适的供应商。这种研究方法可以被认为对服装公司和其他行业有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe
Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
12
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe is a peer reviewed bimonthly scientific journal devoted to current problems of fibre, textile and fibrous products’ science as well as general economic problems of textile industry worldwide. The content of the journal is available online as free open access. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe constitutes a forum for the exchange of information and the establishment of mutual contact for cooperation between scientific centres, as well as between science and industry.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the Accelerated Ageing of Carbon-Epoxy Composites on their Mechanical Properties Knitted Heating Mats Evaluation of Insulation against Contact Heat, Radiant Heat and Sensory Comfort of Basalt Fabric-Based Composites with Parylene C Coating Digital Inheritance of Traditional Mongolian Robes of the Nayman Tribe Experimental Investigation on the Bending Behavior of Weft Interlaced Multilayered Woven Fabrics for Composite Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1