Self-medication and the 'infodemic' during mandatory preventive isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2022-02-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986221072376
Andrés Gaviria-Mendoza, Danny Alberto Mejía-Mazo, Carolina Duarte-Blandón, Juan Daniel Castrillón-Spitia, Manuel Enrique Machado-Duque, Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo, Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba
{"title":"Self-medication and the 'infodemic' during mandatory preventive isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Andrés Gaviria-Mendoza, Danny Alberto Mejía-Mazo, Carolina Duarte-Blandón, Juan Daniel Castrillón-Spitia, Manuel Enrique Machado-Duque, Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo, Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba","doi":"10.1177/20420986221072376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Quarantine due to the COVID-19 pandemic altered the supply and demand of health services. This, together with the 'infodemic' and generalized panic, could alter the patterns of self-medication in the population. The objective was to characterize the patterns of self-medication in four cities of Colombia during mandatory preventive isolation in 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study done in four Colombian cities during mandatory national preventive isolation between June and September 2020. A sample of 397 adults who responded to an online survey, based on the Instrument for Systematic Data Collection for Self-medication (<i>Instrumento de Recolección Sistemática de Datos para la Automedicación</i>-IRIS-AM), was obtained. The use of social networks (including WhatsApp) as the source of information about medications was explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 397 people surveyed had a median age of 31.0 years, and 58.2% were women. The prevalence of self-medication during lockdown was 34.3% (<i>n</i> = 136). Medications targeting the nervous system (<i>n</i> = 117; 86.0% of those participants with self-medication) and the musculoskeletal system (<i>n</i> = 68; 50.0%) were the most commonly used. Ten (7.4%) of the self-medicated patients reported doing so to prevent COVID-19, and 15 (11.0%) named social networks as the source of information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than one-third of the participants reported self-medication during COVID-19 lockdown, mainly with analgesic-type nervous system medications. People who reported self-medication to prevent COVID-19 often got their information from social networks, the Internet, and WhatsApp.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong><b>Self-medication during mandatory COVID-19 isolation:</b> <b>Introduction:</b> Self-medication refers to the use of medications to treat self-diagnosed disorders or symptoms, and it can lead to health problems. This habit is widely practiced by the people, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The objective was to characterize the patterns of self-medication in four cities of Colombia during mandatory preventive isolation in 2020 due the quarantine by COVID-19 explored pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> We made a cross-sectional study between June and September 2020, and a sample of 397 adults who responded to an online survey. The use of social networks (including WhatsApp) as the source of information about medications was explored. <b>Results:</b> The prevalence of self-medication during lockdown was 34.3% (<i>n</i> = 136). Medications targeting the nervous system (<i>n</i> = 117; 86.0% of those participants with self-medication) and the musculoskeletal system (strategies <i>n</i> = 68; 50.0%) were the most commonly used. <b>Conclusion:</b> People who reported self-medication to prevent COVID-19 often got their information from social networks, the Internet, and WhatsApp. These findings raise the possibility of designing pedagogical strategies on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986221072376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Quarantine due to the COVID-19 pandemic altered the supply and demand of health services. This, together with the 'infodemic' and generalized panic, could alter the patterns of self-medication in the population. The objective was to characterize the patterns of self-medication in four cities of Colombia during mandatory preventive isolation in 2020.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done in four Colombian cities during mandatory national preventive isolation between June and September 2020. A sample of 397 adults who responded to an online survey, based on the Instrument for Systematic Data Collection for Self-medication (Instrumento de Recolección Sistemática de Datos para la Automedicación-IRIS-AM), was obtained. The use of social networks (including WhatsApp) as the source of information about medications was explored.

Results: The 397 people surveyed had a median age of 31.0 years, and 58.2% were women. The prevalence of self-medication during lockdown was 34.3% (n = 136). Medications targeting the nervous system (n = 117; 86.0% of those participants with self-medication) and the musculoskeletal system (n = 68; 50.0%) were the most commonly used. Ten (7.4%) of the self-medicated patients reported doing so to prevent COVID-19, and 15 (11.0%) named social networks as the source of information.

Conclusion: More than one-third of the participants reported self-medication during COVID-19 lockdown, mainly with analgesic-type nervous system medications. People who reported self-medication to prevent COVID-19 often got their information from social networks, the Internet, and WhatsApp.

Plain language summary: Self-medication during mandatory COVID-19 isolation: Introduction: Self-medication refers to the use of medications to treat self-diagnosed disorders or symptoms, and it can lead to health problems. This habit is widely practiced by the people, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The objective was to characterize the patterns of self-medication in four cities of Colombia during mandatory preventive isolation in 2020 due the quarantine by COVID-19 explored pandemic. Methods: We made a cross-sectional study between June and September 2020, and a sample of 397 adults who responded to an online survey. The use of social networks (including WhatsApp) as the source of information about medications was explored. Results: The prevalence of self-medication during lockdown was 34.3% (n = 136). Medications targeting the nervous system (n = 117; 86.0% of those participants with self-medication) and the musculoskeletal system (strategies n = 68; 50.0%) were the most commonly used. Conclusion: People who reported self-medication to prevent COVID-19 often got their information from social networks, the Internet, and WhatsApp. These findings raise the possibility of designing pedagogical strategies on this topic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行导致的强制性预防性隔离期间的自我指示和“信息传播”
目的:新冠肺炎大流行导致的隔离改变了卫生服务的供应和需求。这一点,再加上“信息传播”和普遍的恐慌,可能会改变人群的自我用药模式。目的是描述2020年哥伦比亚四个城市在强制预防性隔离期间的自我用药模式。方法:这是一项横断面研究,于2020年6月至9月在哥伦比亚四个城市进行强制性全国预防性隔离。根据自我用药系统数据收集工具(Instrumento de Recolección Sistemática de Datos para la Automedición–IRIS-AM),对397名成年人进行了在线调查。探讨了使用社交网络(包括WhatsApp)作为药物信息来源的问题。结果:397名受访者的中位年龄为31.0岁,其中58.2%为女性。封锁期间自我用药的发生率为34.3%(n = 136)。针对神经系统的药物(n = 117;86.0%的参与者自行服药)和肌肉骨骼系统(n = 68;50.0%)是最常用的。10名(7.4%)自我用药患者报告称,他们这样做是为了预防新冠肺炎,15名(11.0%)患者将社交网络列为信息来源。结论:超过三分之一的参与者报告在新冠肺炎封锁期间自我用药,主要是镇痛型神经系统药物。报告自我服药预防新冠肺炎的人通常从社交网络、互联网和WhatsApp获得信息。简明语言摘要新冠肺炎强制隔离期间的自我护理简介:自我护理是指使用药物治疗自我诊断的疾病或症状,它可能导致健康问题。这一习惯被人们广泛采用,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家。其目的是描述2020年由于新冠肺炎疫情隔离而强制预防性隔离期间哥伦比亚四个城市的自我用药模式。方法:我们在2020年6月至9月期间进行了一项横断面研究,抽样调查了397名在线调查的成年人。探讨了使用社交网络(包括WhatsApp)作为药物信息来源的问题。结果:封锁期间自我用药的发生率为34.3%(n = 136)。针对神经系统的药物(n = 117;86.0%的参与者自行服药)和肌肉骨骼系统(策略n = 68;50.0%)是最常用的。结论:报告自我服药预防新冠肺炎的人通常从社交网络、互联网和WhatsApp获得信息。这些发现为设计这一主题的教学策略提供了可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
期刊最新文献
Assessing potential risk factors for metamizole-induced leukopenia Impact of different doses of esketamine on the incidence of hypotension in propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial Pirfenidone-induced liver injury, a case report of a rare idiosyncratic reaction Fetal exposure to isotretinoin in Saudi Arabia: a multicenter real-world data analysis from 2015 to 2020 Characterizing medication safety incidents in surgical patients: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of incident reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1