Screening of Diabetic Patients for Frailty with the Frail Scale: A Comparison with the Fried's Phenotype Criteria in Saudi Arabia

Al-Ali Sadiq Ahmed, AlJabr Qasem Mohammed, Alramadhan Zainab Tariq, Algharrash Zainab, Alyousif Alhawraa Jassim Ahmad, Alessa Aroob Nassir, Al-Ababneh Hassan Ali
{"title":"Screening of Diabetic Patients for Frailty with the Frail Scale: A Comparison with the Fried's Phenotype Criteria in Saudi Arabia","authors":"Al-Ali Sadiq Ahmed, AlJabr Qasem Mohammed, Alramadhan Zainab Tariq, Algharrash Zainab, Alyousif Alhawraa Jassim Ahmad, Alessa Aroob Nassir, Al-Ababneh Hassan Ali","doi":"10.23937/2377-3634/1410150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims: Frailty is a serious health issue that is associated with the decline of muscle and nerve functions. Several conditions have been associated with frailty, such as dementia, cancer, and diabetes. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prevalence of frailty in Saudi diabetic patients and assess the association between diabetes and frailty. Also, to investigate if the FRAIL scale is an adequate tool to identify frail patients to pre-frail and healthy patients. Methods: Seventy-eight participants were divided into three categories; group-I, the control group, included 31 healthy men 65 to 75 years, group-II 25 patients with DM2 aged 50-64, and group-III included 22 patients with DM2 aged 65-80 years-old. Frailty index using Fried’s criteria (CHS) and FRAIL scale was determined for all the participants. In ROC analysis, we evaluated diagnostic accuracy and AUC areas of the FRAIL scale compared with the CHS criteria. Results: Frail patients were more in Group II and III (diabetics) (44%, 55%) respectively than in Group-I (nondiabetics) 10%. People aged 63-years-old or more are more likely to have frailty syndrome. ReSeARcH ARTicle","PeriodicalId":92797,"journal":{"name":"International journal of diabetes and clinical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of diabetes and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-3634/1410150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and aims: Frailty is a serious health issue that is associated with the decline of muscle and nerve functions. Several conditions have been associated with frailty, such as dementia, cancer, and diabetes. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prevalence of frailty in Saudi diabetic patients and assess the association between diabetes and frailty. Also, to investigate if the FRAIL scale is an adequate tool to identify frail patients to pre-frail and healthy patients. Methods: Seventy-eight participants were divided into three categories; group-I, the control group, included 31 healthy men 65 to 75 years, group-II 25 patients with DM2 aged 50-64, and group-III included 22 patients with DM2 aged 65-80 years-old. Frailty index using Fried’s criteria (CHS) and FRAIL scale was determined for all the participants. In ROC analysis, we evaluated diagnostic accuracy and AUC areas of the FRAIL scale compared with the CHS criteria. Results: Frail patients were more in Group II and III (diabetics) (44%, 55%) respectively than in Group-I (nondiabetics) 10%. People aged 63-years-old or more are more likely to have frailty syndrome. ReSeARcH ARTicle
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用虚弱量表筛选糖尿病患者的虚弱:与沙特阿拉伯Fried表型标准的比较
背景和目的:虚弱是一个严重的健康问题,与肌肉和神经功能的下降有关。一些疾病与虚弱有关,如痴呆症、癌症和糖尿病。该研究的目的是评估沙特糖尿病患者虚弱的患病率,并评估糖尿病与虚弱之间的关系。此外,调查FRAIL量表是否是识别虚弱患者、前期虚弱患者和健康患者的适当工具。方法:78名参与者被分为三类;第一组为对照组,包括31名65至75岁的健康男性,第二组为25名50-64岁的DM2患者,第三组为22名65-80岁的DM2。使用弗里德标准(CHS)和FRAIL量表确定所有参与者的虚弱指数。在ROC分析中,我们评估了FRAIL量表与CHS标准相比的诊断准确性和AUC面积。结果:II组和III组(糖尿病患者)的Frail患者分别为44%和55%,而I组(非糖尿病患者)为10%。63岁或以上的人更容易患上虚弱综合征。ReSeARcH ARTicle
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insulin Injection Abscesses caused by Bacteria of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex Glycaemic Control and Weight Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patient Using a Wholly Nigerian Diet - A Hospital Based Study In a Changing World of Disease Prevalence, We Must Change Our Differentials: A Case of Diabetic Myonecrosis Incidence and Predictors of Diabetic Retinopathy among Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetic Patients at Chronic Follow-Up Clinic of University of Gondar Specialized Hospital: A Retrospective Follow-Up Study Determinants of Glucose Imbalance and its Effects on Developing Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in an Urban and Rural Ghanaian Community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1