Head and Neck Tumor Histopathological Image Representation with Pr with Pre- Trained Conv ained Convolutional Neur olutional Neural Network and Vision al Network and Vision Transformer

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Dentistry Indonesia Pub Date : 2023-04-30 DOI:10.14693/jdi.v30i1.1501
Ranny Rahaningrum Herdiantoputri, D. Komura, Tohru Ikeda, S. Ishikawa
{"title":"Head and Neck Tumor Histopathological Image Representation with Pr with Pre- Trained Conv ained Convolutional Neur olutional Neural Network and Vision al Network and Vision Transformer","authors":"Ranny Rahaningrum Herdiantoputri, D. Komura, Tohru Ikeda, S. Ishikawa","doi":"10.14693/jdi.v30i1.1501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image representation via machine learning is an approach to quantitatively represent histopathological images of head and neck tumors for future applications of artificial intelligence-assisted pathological diagnosis systems. Objective: This study compares image representations produced by a pre-trained convolutional neural network (VGG16) to those produced by a vision transformer (ViT-L/14) in terms of the classification performance of head and neck tumors. Methods: Whole-slide images of five oral tumor categories (n = 319 cases) were analyzed. Image patches were created from manually annotated regions at 4096, 2048, and 1024 pixels and rescaled to 256 pixels. Image representations were classified by logistic regression or multiclass Support Vector Machines for binary or multiclass classifications, respectively. Results: VGG16 with 1024 pixels performed best for benign and malignant salivary gland tumors (BSGT and MSGT) (F1 = 0.703 and 0.803). VGG16 outperformed ViT for BSGT and MSGT with all magnification levels. However, ViT outperformed VGG16 for maxillofacial bone tumors (MBTs), odontogenic cysts (OCs), and odontogenic tumors (OTs) with all magnification levels (F1 = 0.780; 0.874; 0.751). Conclusion: Being more texture-biased, VGG16 performs better in representing BSGT and MSGT","PeriodicalId":53873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14693/jdi.v30i1.1501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Image representation via machine learning is an approach to quantitatively represent histopathological images of head and neck tumors for future applications of artificial intelligence-assisted pathological diagnosis systems. Objective: This study compares image representations produced by a pre-trained convolutional neural network (VGG16) to those produced by a vision transformer (ViT-L/14) in terms of the classification performance of head and neck tumors. Methods: Whole-slide images of five oral tumor categories (n = 319 cases) were analyzed. Image patches were created from manually annotated regions at 4096, 2048, and 1024 pixels and rescaled to 256 pixels. Image representations were classified by logistic regression or multiclass Support Vector Machines for binary or multiclass classifications, respectively. Results: VGG16 with 1024 pixels performed best for benign and malignant salivary gland tumors (BSGT and MSGT) (F1 = 0.703 and 0.803). VGG16 outperformed ViT for BSGT and MSGT with all magnification levels. However, ViT outperformed VGG16 for maxillofacial bone tumors (MBTs), odontogenic cysts (OCs), and odontogenic tumors (OTs) with all magnification levels (F1 = 0.780; 0.874; 0.751). Conclusion: Being more texture-biased, VGG16 performs better in representing BSGT and MSGT
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于预训练卷积神经网络、视觉网络和视觉变换的头颈部肿瘤组织病理图像Pr表示
通过机器学习的图像表示是一种定量表示头颈部肿瘤组织病理图像的方法,用于人工智能辅助病理诊断系统的未来应用。目的:本研究比较了预训练卷积神经网络(VGG16)和视觉转换器(ViT-L/14)在头颈部肿瘤分类性能方面的图像表征。方法:对5类口腔肿瘤319例的全片影像进行分析。图像补丁从4096、2048和1024像素的手动注释区域创建,并重新缩放为256像素。图像表示分别使用逻辑回归或多类支持向量机进行二值或多类分类。结果:1024像素的VGG16对涎腺良恶性肿瘤(BSGT和MSGT)的治疗效果最佳(F1 = 0.703和0.803)。VGG16在所有放大倍率下都优于BSGT和MSGT的ViT。然而,在所有放大倍率水平上,ViT在颌面部骨肿瘤(mbt)、牙源性囊肿(OCs)和牙源性肿瘤(OTs)上的表现都优于VGG16 (F1 = 0.780;0.874;0.751)。结论:VGG16具有更强的纹理偏向性,可以更好地表示BSGT和MSGT
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dentistry Indonesia
Journal of Dentistry Indonesia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Factors Aff ors Affecting the Pr ecting the Preference of Or ence of Orthodontic Appliances thodontic Appliances Among Undergraduate Students in West Jakarta Evaluation of T aluation of Trabecular Bone Ar abecular Bone Around the Impacted Maxillar ound the Impacted Maxillary Canine on CBCT Images by Fractal Analysis Integration of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) in Conventional Teaching and Learning for Fixed Prosthodontics - A Case Study Case Repor Case Report and X t and X-ray Microtomography and Scanning Electr aphy and Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Teeth with Hypocalcified Amelogenesis Imperfecta Comparison of EDTA and Boric Acid Irrigation in Terms of Root Canal Dentin Microhardness and Sealer Penetration Depth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1