In Defense of Curiosity: Some Thoughts on Psychoanalysis and Secularism on the 20th Anniversary of September 11th

Pub Date : 2021-10-07 DOI:10.1080/00797308.2021.1971906
J. Whitebrook
{"title":"In Defense of Curiosity: Some Thoughts on Psychoanalysis and Secularism on the 20th Anniversary of September 11th","authors":"J. Whitebrook","doi":"10.1080/00797308.2021.1971906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Reflecting on developments that have occurred in the twenty years since 9/11, this paper attempts to refine a conception of what might be called psychoanalytic secularism. It does so by addressing a specific question: How can the field do justice to the demands that are raised by religion without violating the standpoint of science? Following Loewald, it argues not only that the profession’s historical failure to do justice to the topic of religion was a result of its general adherence to Freud’s “official” position, but also that the preoedipal turn has provided us with the resources to correct that failure which does not abandon a scientific stance.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.2021.1971906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reflecting on developments that have occurred in the twenty years since 9/11, this paper attempts to refine a conception of what might be called psychoanalytic secularism. It does so by addressing a specific question: How can the field do justice to the demands that are raised by religion without violating the standpoint of science? Following Loewald, it argues not only that the profession’s historical failure to do justice to the topic of religion was a result of its general adherence to Freud’s “official” position, but also that the preoedipal turn has provided us with the resources to correct that failure which does not abandon a scientific stance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
为好奇心辩护:“9.11”20周年之际的心理分析与世俗主义思考
摘要:本文回顾了自9/11事件以来20年的发展,试图完善一个可能被称为精神分析世俗主义的概念。它通过解决一个特定的问题来做到这一点:该领域如何在不违背科学立场的情况下公正地对待宗教提出的要求?继Loewald之后,它不仅认为该专业在历史上未能公正地对待宗教主题是其普遍坚持弗洛伊德的“官方”立场的结果,而且认为前恋母情结的转向为我们提供了纠正这种不放弃科学立场的失败的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1