{"title":"The Work of Stott & Sons for the Linotype Company at Altrincham 2: The Housing Estate","authors":"R. Holden","doi":"10.1080/03090728.2022.2112503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The architects Stott & Sons were responsible for the works of the Linotype Company at Broadheath near Altrincham, Cheshire, in 1896–9. A housing estate was developed in association with the works from 1897. This was laid out on the lines of later garden suburb planning with curving roads and short terraces, providing superior housing for the workforce. The houses, in four types of varying size and rental value, are of picturesque cottage style of somewhat eccentric appearance. Census records show that occupancy of the types of houses depended more on family size and the number of wage earners rather than place in the works’ hierarchy. There was mildly paternalistic thinking behind the estate, but provision was also influenced by commercial motives and a lack of existing housing. A second stage of housing was designed by the company's own drawing office following disagreements with Stott & Sons. The estate was never completed to its originally intended size, although it survives largely intact and is now a conservation area.","PeriodicalId":42635,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Archaeology Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"133 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Archaeology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03090728.2022.2112503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT The architects Stott & Sons were responsible for the works of the Linotype Company at Broadheath near Altrincham, Cheshire, in 1896–9. A housing estate was developed in association with the works from 1897. This was laid out on the lines of later garden suburb planning with curving roads and short terraces, providing superior housing for the workforce. The houses, in four types of varying size and rental value, are of picturesque cottage style of somewhat eccentric appearance. Census records show that occupancy of the types of houses depended more on family size and the number of wage earners rather than place in the works’ hierarchy. There was mildly paternalistic thinking behind the estate, but provision was also influenced by commercial motives and a lack of existing housing. A second stage of housing was designed by the company's own drawing office following disagreements with Stott & Sons. The estate was never completed to its originally intended size, although it survives largely intact and is now a conservation area.
期刊介绍:
Industrial Archaeology Review aims to publish research in industrial archaeology, which is defined as a period study embracing the tangible evidence of social, economic and technological development in the period since industrialisation, generally from the early-18th century onwards. It is a peer-reviewed academic journal, with scholarly standards of presentation, yet seeks to encourage submissions from both amateurs and professionals which will inform all those working in the field of current developments. Industrial Archaeology Review is the journal of the Association for Industrial Archaeology. Published twice a year, the focal point and common theme of its contents is the surviving evidence of industrial activity.