Performances of Crypto, Market Indexes, and Gold Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis

Safinatuz Zuhriyah, W. Setiyono, Detak Prapanca
{"title":"Performances of Crypto, Market Indexes, and Gold Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Safinatuz Zuhriyah, W. Setiyono, Detak Prapanca","doi":"10.18196/jai.v23i2.13848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research aims: This study aims to investigate empirical evidence of a comparison of investment instruments, including Bitcoin, Indonesia Composite Index (ICI), and gold, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Design/Methodology/Approach: Analytical methods employed comparison study using secondary data. The Microsoft Excel program was utilized to calculate formulas for each variable. Then, data were statistically processed using the SPSS application, i.e., independent sample test, testing for differences. The sample used in this study was the closing price of Bitcoin, the price of the ICI, and the price of gold, with monthly data from the beginning of January 2018 to the end of December 2021, to demonstrate a significant difference between the risks of Bitcoin, ICI, and gold before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Research findings: The hypothesis test results revealed that before the COVID-19 pandemic, the investment risk of ICI and gold was the lowest, with a significance level of 0.000 (0.0000.05) on a different t-test at a 5% significance level. Thus, there was a significant difference in investment risk between ICI and gold. Meanwhile, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of investing between Bitcoin and the ICI was the lowest, with a significance level of risk of was 0.000 (0.000 0.05) on different tests at the significance levels of 5%. In short, there was a big difference in investment risk between Bitcoin and the ICI.Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study provides additional literature on decision-making, especially on risk.","PeriodicalId":33157,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Investment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Investment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i2.13848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research aims: This study aims to investigate empirical evidence of a comparison of investment instruments, including Bitcoin, Indonesia Composite Index (ICI), and gold, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Design/Methodology/Approach: Analytical methods employed comparison study using secondary data. The Microsoft Excel program was utilized to calculate formulas for each variable. Then, data were statistically processed using the SPSS application, i.e., independent sample test, testing for differences. The sample used in this study was the closing price of Bitcoin, the price of the ICI, and the price of gold, with monthly data from the beginning of January 2018 to the end of December 2021, to demonstrate a significant difference between the risks of Bitcoin, ICI, and gold before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Research findings: The hypothesis test results revealed that before the COVID-19 pandemic, the investment risk of ICI and gold was the lowest, with a significance level of 0.000 (0.0000.05) on a different t-test at a 5% significance level. Thus, there was a significant difference in investment risk between ICI and gold. Meanwhile, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of investing between Bitcoin and the ICI was the lowest, with a significance level of risk of was 0.000 (0.000 0.05) on different tests at the significance levels of 5%. In short, there was a big difference in investment risk between Bitcoin and the ICI.Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study provides additional literature on decision-making, especially on risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行前后加密货币、市场指数和黄金的表现:比较分析
研究目的:本研究旨在调查新冠肺炎大流行之前和期间包括比特币、印度尼西亚综合指数(ICI)和黄金在内的投资工具比较的经验证据。设计/方法/方法:采用分析方法,使用二次数据进行比较研究。使用Microsoft Excel程序计算每个变量的公式。然后,使用SPSS应用程序对数据进行统计处理,即独立样本检验,检验差异。本研究中使用的样本是比特币的收盘价、ICI的价格和黄金的价格,以及2018年1月初至2021年12月底的月度数据,以证明比特币、ICI和黄金在新冠肺炎大流行之前和期间的风险之间存在显著差异。研究结果:假设检验结果显示,在新冠肺炎大流行之前,ICI和黄金的投资风险最低,在5%显著性水平的不同t检验中,显著性水平为0.000(0.0000.05)。因此,ICI和黄金在投资风险方面存在显著差异。同时,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,比特币和ICI之间的投资风险最低,在5%的显著性水平下,不同测试的显著性风险水平为0.000(0.000 0.05)。简而言之,比特币和ICI在投资风险方面存在很大差异。理论贡献/独创性:这项研究提供了更多关于决策的文献,尤其是关于风险的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Herding behavior, information type, and overconfidence bias: an experimental study on novice investors’ investment decisions Determinants of tax compliance behavior among central Java SMEs: The mediating role of intention to comply Voluntary disclosure with the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) framework and value relevance Sharia stock investment decisions: Sharia stock literacy and risk factors and their relations with behavioral bias Investigating the moderating role of past behavior in the relationship between risk aversion and investment choice in the Tehran stock market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1