Using Alternatives to Determine the Shallowest Depth for Bathymetric Charting: Case Study

IF 1.8 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Surveying Engineering Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000278
T. H. Mohammadloo, M. Snellen, D. Simons, B. Dierikx, S. Bicknese
{"title":"Using Alternatives to Determine the Shallowest Depth for Bathymetric Charting: Case Study","authors":"T. H. Mohammadloo, M. Snellen, D. Simons, B. Dierikx, S. Bicknese","doi":"10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methods for gridding multibeam echo sounder (MBES) measurements to equidistant grids are proposed as alternatives to the shallowest measured depth, which is affected by outliers. The approaches considered use a combination of mean and standard deviation of soundings and the regression coefficient from the best fitted plane. These methods along with mean and shallowest depths were applied to two surveyed areas. Two issues were found to be of importance, that is, a proper distribution of soundings and low uncertainties in the depth measurements. Improper sampling excludes using the method employing regression coefficients. For flat areas, the shallowest measured depth was found to be highly influenced by measurement uncertainties, counteracted when using the mean depth. However, the mean depth underestimates the shallowest depth for areas with slopes. When correcting the mean depth for standard deviation, the effect of slopes is accounted for while the influence of measurement uncertainties is decreased compared to shallowest measured depth. Since the uncertainties are dependent on beam angle, depth, and measurement equipment, these issues need to be accounted for in survey planning.","PeriodicalId":54366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surveying Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000278","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surveying Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Methods for gridding multibeam echo sounder (MBES) measurements to equidistant grids are proposed as alternatives to the shallowest measured depth, which is affected by outliers. The approaches considered use a combination of mean and standard deviation of soundings and the regression coefficient from the best fitted plane. These methods along with mean and shallowest depths were applied to two surveyed areas. Two issues were found to be of importance, that is, a proper distribution of soundings and low uncertainties in the depth measurements. Improper sampling excludes using the method employing regression coefficients. For flat areas, the shallowest measured depth was found to be highly influenced by measurement uncertainties, counteracted when using the mean depth. However, the mean depth underestimates the shallowest depth for areas with slopes. When correcting the mean depth for standard deviation, the effect of slopes is accounted for while the influence of measurement uncertainties is decreased compared to shallowest measured depth. Since the uncertainties are dependent on beam angle, depth, and measurement equipment, these issues need to be accounted for in survey planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用备选方案确定水深图的最浅深度:案例研究
提出了将多波束测深(MBES)测量数据网格化到等距网格的方法,以替代受离群值影响的最浅测量深度。所考虑的方法使用探测的平均值和标准差以及最佳拟合平面的回归系数的组合。这些方法与平均深度和最浅深度一起应用于两个调查区域。发现两个重要的问题,即合理的测深分布和深度测量的低不确定性。不适当的抽样排除使用回归系数的方法。对于平坦区域,发现最浅的测量深度受到测量不确定度的高度影响,在使用平均深度时被抵消。然而,对于有坡度的地区,平均深度低估了最浅深度。在对平均深度进行标准差校正时,考虑了坡度的影响,而与最浅测量深度相比,测量不确定性的影响减小了。由于不确定性取决于波束角度、深度和测量设备,因此需要在调查计划中考虑这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Journal of Surveying Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surveying Engineering covers the broad spectrum of surveying and mapping activities encountered in modern practice. It includes traditional areas such as construction surveys, control surveys, photogrammetric mapping, engineering layout, deformation measurements, precise alignment, and boundary surveying. It also includes newer development such as satellite positioning; spatial database design, quality assurance, and information management of geographic information systems; computer applications involving modeling, data structures, algorithms, and information processing; digital mapping, coordinate systems, cartographic representations, and the role of surveying engineering professionals in an information society.
期刊最新文献
A Test of Height Transfer Using Vertical Deflection Measurements by the Digital Zenith Camera VESTA MINQUE Method Variance Component Estimation for the Mixed Additive and Multiplicative Random Error Model Optimal Minimum L1-Norm Criteria for Outlier Identification in GNSS and Leveling Networks Estimating Roadway Horizontal Alignment from Geographic Information Systems Data: An Artificial Neural Network–Based Approach A Novel Time–Frequency Approach Based on the Noise Characterization for Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Using GNSS Observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1