Relationship between Meeting Physical Activity Guideline Parameters and Body Mass Index (BMI) in Adults

P. Hart
{"title":"Relationship between Meeting Physical Activity Guideline Parameters and Body Mass Index (BMI) in Adults","authors":"P. Hart","doi":"10.12691/jpar-6-2-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Physical activity (PA) and risk of obesity are inversely related in adult populations. However, the extent to which meeting different PA guidelines influence body mass index (BMI) is less known. The aim of this research was to examine how different PA guideline parameters affect BMI in adults. Methods: The Montana Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS, 2019) was used for this study. Four different PA guideline variables were used and included 1) 2-level aerobic PA (APA) (met APA or did not meet APA), 2) 2-level muscle strengthening activity (MSA) (met MSA or did not meet MSA), 3) 4-level PA (met both APA and MSA, met APA only, met MSA only, or met neither), and 4) 3-level APA categories (active, insufficiently active, or inactive). BMI was calculated from self-reported height and weight (kg/m2). Multiple linear regression was used to examine the effect of each PA guideline parameter on BMI while controlling for sociodemographic variables. Results: Findings showed that meeting the 2-level APA (slope (b) = -0.74 kg/m2, p < .0001) or the 2-level MSA (b = -0.75 kg/m2, p < .0001) guideline was associated with lower mean BMI. In the 4-level PA model, as compared to meeting neither guideline, meeting APA only (b = -0.58 kg/m2, p = .0119) or meeting both APA and MSA (b = -1.32 kg/m2, p < .0001) was associated with lower mean BMI. Meeting MSA only did not show significantly (p = .1748) different BMI from those meeting neither guideline. In the 3-level APA model, as compared to those categorized as inactive, those categorized as active (b = -0.91 kg/m2, p < .0001) had lower mean BMI. Those categorized as insufficiently active did not have significantly (p = .1748) different BMI from those categorized as inactive. Furthermore, the 4-level PA guidelines × sex interaction was significant (p = .030) and indicated lower mean BMI for females meeting either MSA only (b = -1.05 kg/m2, p = .0215), APA only (b = -1.14 kg/m2, p = .0014), or both APA and MSA (b = -1.84 kg/m2, p < .0001) guideline (p for trend < .0001). Whereas for males, only meeting both APA and MSA was associated with lower mean BMI (b = -0.77 kg/m2, p = .0077). Conclusion: This study found that meeting either APA or MSA guideline is associated with lower BMI in adults. However, sex-specific analyses indicate that this is true for females only and in dose-response fashion. Lower BMI in males is only associated with meeting both APA and MSA guidelines. Health promotion specialists concerned with obesity should understand the influence that each PA guideline has on relative body weight. Physical activity programming should promote both APA and MSA among adults in Montana.","PeriodicalId":92549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/jpar-6-2-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) and risk of obesity are inversely related in adult populations. However, the extent to which meeting different PA guidelines influence body mass index (BMI) is less known. The aim of this research was to examine how different PA guideline parameters affect BMI in adults. Methods: The Montana Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS, 2019) was used for this study. Four different PA guideline variables were used and included 1) 2-level aerobic PA (APA) (met APA or did not meet APA), 2) 2-level muscle strengthening activity (MSA) (met MSA or did not meet MSA), 3) 4-level PA (met both APA and MSA, met APA only, met MSA only, or met neither), and 4) 3-level APA categories (active, insufficiently active, or inactive). BMI was calculated from self-reported height and weight (kg/m2). Multiple linear regression was used to examine the effect of each PA guideline parameter on BMI while controlling for sociodemographic variables. Results: Findings showed that meeting the 2-level APA (slope (b) = -0.74 kg/m2, p < .0001) or the 2-level MSA (b = -0.75 kg/m2, p < .0001) guideline was associated with lower mean BMI. In the 4-level PA model, as compared to meeting neither guideline, meeting APA only (b = -0.58 kg/m2, p = .0119) or meeting both APA and MSA (b = -1.32 kg/m2, p < .0001) was associated with lower mean BMI. Meeting MSA only did not show significantly (p = .1748) different BMI from those meeting neither guideline. In the 3-level APA model, as compared to those categorized as inactive, those categorized as active (b = -0.91 kg/m2, p < .0001) had lower mean BMI. Those categorized as insufficiently active did not have significantly (p = .1748) different BMI from those categorized as inactive. Furthermore, the 4-level PA guidelines × sex interaction was significant (p = .030) and indicated lower mean BMI for females meeting either MSA only (b = -1.05 kg/m2, p = .0215), APA only (b = -1.14 kg/m2, p = .0014), or both APA and MSA (b = -1.84 kg/m2, p < .0001) guideline (p for trend < .0001). Whereas for males, only meeting both APA and MSA was associated with lower mean BMI (b = -0.77 kg/m2, p = .0077). Conclusion: This study found that meeting either APA or MSA guideline is associated with lower BMI in adults. However, sex-specific analyses indicate that this is true for females only and in dose-response fashion. Lower BMI in males is only associated with meeting both APA and MSA guidelines. Health promotion specialists concerned with obesity should understand the influence that each PA guideline has on relative body weight. Physical activity programming should promote both APA and MSA among adults in Montana.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人身体活动指南参数与体重指数(BMI)的关系
背景:在成年人群中,体育活动(PA)和肥胖风险呈负相关。然而,满足不同的PA指南对体重指数(BMI)的影响程度尚不清楚。本研究的目的是研究不同的PA指南参数如何影响成年人的BMI。方法:本研究采用蒙大拿州行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS,2019)。使用了四个不同的PA指南变量,包括1)2级有氧PA(APA)(满足APA或不满足APA),2)2级肌肉强化活动(MSA)(满足MSA或不满足MSA),3)4级PA(同时满足APA和MSA,仅满足APA,仅满足MSA,或两者均不满足),以及4)3级APA类别(活动、活动不足或不活动)。根据自我报告的身高和体重(kg/m2)计算BMI。多元线性回归用于检验每个PA指南参数对BMI的影响,同时控制社会人口统计学变量。结果:研究结果表明,符合2级APA(斜率(b)=-0.74 kg/m2,p<.0001)或2级MSA(b=-0.75 kg/m2,p<.0001。在4级PA模型中,与不符合两项指南相比,仅满足APA(b=-0.58 kg/m2,p=.0119)或同时满足APA和MSA(b=-1.32 kg/m2,p<.0001)与较低的平均BMI相关。仅符合MSA的患者与不符合两项指南的患者的BMI没有显著差异(p=.1748)。在3级APA模型中,与被归类为不活动的人相比,被归类为活动的人(b=-0.91 kg/m2,p<.0001)的平均BMI较低。被归类为活动不足的人与被归类为不活动的人的BMI没有显著差异(p=.1748)。此外,4级PA指南×性别互动显著(p=0.030),表明女性的平均BMI较低,符合仅MSA(b=-1.05 kg/m2,p=.0215)、仅APA(b=-1.14 kg/m2,p=0.014)或APA和MSA(b=1.84 kg/m2,p<.0001)指南(趋势<.0001的p)。而男性,只有同时满足APA和MSA与较低的平均BMI相关(b=-0.77kg/m2,p=.0077)。结论:本研究发现,满足APA或MSA指南与成人较低的BMI相关。然而,性别特异性分析表明,这仅适用于女性,并且呈剂量反应方式。男性较低的BMI仅与同时满足APA和MSA指南相关。关注肥胖的健康促进专家应该了解每个PA指南对相对体重的影响。体育活动计划应促进蒙大拿州成年人的APA和MSA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Longitudinal Analysis of Physical Activity Levels in European Older Adults: The Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe The Impact of Moderate Intensities of Intermittent Interval Walking on Excess Post-exercise Oxygen Consumption Effects of School Closure Due to COVID-19 on the Physical Fitness of Japanese Kindergarteners: A Longitudinal Study BriefTrends: State-Specific Prevalence of Meeting Muscle-Strengthening Activity (MSA) Guidelines in U.S. Adults, 2017-2019 ‘Tracking Together’—Simultaneous Use of Human and Dog Activity Trackers: Results from a Factorial, Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1