Content and Quality of Online Videos About Ostomy Pouch Changes: A Descriptive Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY Wound management & prevention Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.25270/wmp.2022.8.2532
Zeynep Temiz, Didem Kandemir
{"title":"Content and Quality of Online Videos About Ostomy Pouch Changes: A Descriptive Study.","authors":"Zeynep Temiz, Didem Kandemir","doi":"10.25270/wmp.2022.8.2532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nMany health-related videos are available online. One type of health-related video is related to stoma pouch change. However, a system to evaluate the quality and content of these videos is lacking.\n\n\nPURPOSE\nTo evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos on colostomy pouch change.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA descriptive study was carried out by searching for videos on March 15, 2021, using the key words \"colostomy care,\" \"colostomy bag/pouch change,\" and \"ostomy bag/pouch change.\" A 5-point Global Quality Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the videos, and a 10-point scale was used to evaluate the content. The videos were classified as \"useful\" or \"useless\" according to their content and quality scores.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 128 videos were found; 94 videos met the criteria and were included in the study. The content of the 94 videos was examined by 2 independent researchers. The overall content score of the videos was 8.24 ± 1.56, and the overall quality score was 3.14 ± 0.97. A total of 66 (70.21%) videos were useful, and 28 (29.79%) videos were useless. The mean scores of useful videos for content (9.09 ± 0.83) and the average Global Quality Scale scores (3.53 ± 0.76) were significantly higher than those of useless videos (6.17 ± 0.90 and 2.25 ± 0.75, respectively; (P < .05). The results showed that 57.6% of the useful videos were uploaded by universities, professional organizations, and health care professionals, and 67.9% of the useless videos were uploaded by patients; the difference was statistically significant (P < .05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nResults indicated that the majority of online videos evaluated were accurate. Most of these videos were uploaded by universities, professional organizations, health care professionals, or medical advertisers. Although there were many limitations to this study, the authors suggest that health care professionals can direct their patients to these sources after hospital discharge. However, future studies are needed..","PeriodicalId":23741,"journal":{"name":"Wound management & prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound management & prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/wmp.2022.8.2532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Many health-related videos are available online. One type of health-related video is related to stoma pouch change. However, a system to evaluate the quality and content of these videos is lacking. PURPOSE To evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos on colostomy pouch change. METHODS A descriptive study was carried out by searching for videos on March 15, 2021, using the key words "colostomy care," "colostomy bag/pouch change," and "ostomy bag/pouch change." A 5-point Global Quality Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the videos, and a 10-point scale was used to evaluate the content. The videos were classified as "useful" or "useless" according to their content and quality scores. RESULTS A total of 128 videos were found; 94 videos met the criteria and were included in the study. The content of the 94 videos was examined by 2 independent researchers. The overall content score of the videos was 8.24 ± 1.56, and the overall quality score was 3.14 ± 0.97. A total of 66 (70.21%) videos were useful, and 28 (29.79%) videos were useless. The mean scores of useful videos for content (9.09 ± 0.83) and the average Global Quality Scale scores (3.53 ± 0.76) were significantly higher than those of useless videos (6.17 ± 0.90 and 2.25 ± 0.75, respectively; (P < .05). The results showed that 57.6% of the useful videos were uploaded by universities, professional organizations, and health care professionals, and 67.9% of the useless videos were uploaded by patients; the difference was statistically significant (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Results indicated that the majority of online videos evaluated were accurate. Most of these videos were uploaded by universities, professional organizations, health care professionals, or medical advertisers. Although there were many limitations to this study, the authors suggest that health care professionals can direct their patients to these sources after hospital discharge. However, future studies are needed..
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于造口术包变化的在线视频的内容和质量:一项描述性研究。
背景许多与健康相关的视频都可以在线观看。一种与健康相关的视频与造口袋的变化有关。然而,缺乏一个评估这些视频质量和内容的系统。目的评估YouTube上关于结肠造口术改变的视频的内容和质量。方法于2021年3月15日通过搜索视频进行描述性研究,关键词为“结肠造口护理”、“结肠造口袋/袋变化”和“造口袋/囊变化”。使用5分全球质量量表评估视频质量,使用10分量表评估内容。根据视频的内容和质量分数,这些视频被分为“有用”或“无用”。结果共发现128个视频;94个视频符合标准并被纳入研究。两名独立研究人员对94段视频的内容进行了检查。视频的整体内容得分为8.24±1.56,整体质量得分为3.14±0.97。共有66个(70.21%)视频是有用的,28个(29.79%)视频是无用的。有用视频的内容平均得分(9.09±0.83)和全球质量量表平均得分(3.53±0.76)显著高于无用视频(6.17±0.90和2.25±0.75);(P<0.05)。结果显示,57.6%的有用视频由大学、专业组织和卫生保健专业人员上传,67.9%的无用视频由患者上传;差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论结果表明,大多数在线视频评估是准确的。这些视频大多是由大学、专业组织、医疗保健专业人员或医疗广告商上传的。尽管这项研究有很多局限性,但作者建议,医疗保健专业人员可以在出院后将患者引导到这些来源。然而,还需要进一步的研究。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wound management & prevention
Wound management & prevention Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A case series describing combined negative pressure wound therapy and split-thickness skin graft as a method of sterilizing and closing midline laparotomy wounds near ostomies. A new decision tool to objectively select the most appropriate ostomy system - a survey among ostomy nurse specialists. A review of the current trends in chronic wound and scar management. Comparative occipital pressure mapping in the operating room. Early postoperative complications of elective versus emergency stoma creation: a tertiary academic center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1