The Right to Hospitality in International Economic Law: Domestic Investment Laws and the Right to Invest

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 ECONOMICS World Trade Review Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1017/S1474745622000416
G. Dimitropoulos
{"title":"The Right to Hospitality in International Economic Law: Domestic Investment Laws and the Right to Invest","authors":"G. Dimitropoulos","doi":"10.1017/S1474745622000416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Under the Liberal International Order (LIO) of the post-WWII years, foreign investment protection was meant to be granted by international law and institutions. But current economic de-globalization is giving way to institutional and legal de-globalization. Domestic laws relating to foreign investment, especially in the form of Domestic Investment Laws, are taking over International Investment Agreements as the standard means of regulating cross-border trade and investment flows. The article compares substantive and procedural standards of investor protection in international and domestic investment law, as well as old and new Domestic Investment Laws, with a focus on non-discrimination and dispute settlement. The move to domestic law in IEL does not always signify a trend for most states to isolate themselves from the international economy. Rather, it is often an effort to achieve similar ends as those of the LIO but using different means. The article discusses an alternative political economy framework for an international (economic) law of ends, the cornerstone of which is the right to hospitality.","PeriodicalId":46109,"journal":{"name":"World Trade Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"90 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Trade Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745622000416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Under the Liberal International Order (LIO) of the post-WWII years, foreign investment protection was meant to be granted by international law and institutions. But current economic de-globalization is giving way to institutional and legal de-globalization. Domestic laws relating to foreign investment, especially in the form of Domestic Investment Laws, are taking over International Investment Agreements as the standard means of regulating cross-border trade and investment flows. The article compares substantive and procedural standards of investor protection in international and domestic investment law, as well as old and new Domestic Investment Laws, with a focus on non-discrimination and dispute settlement. The move to domestic law in IEL does not always signify a trend for most states to isolate themselves from the international economy. Rather, it is often an effort to achieve similar ends as those of the LIO but using different means. The article discusses an alternative political economy framework for an international (economic) law of ends, the cornerstone of which is the right to hospitality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际经济法中的款待权:国内投资法与投资权
摘要在二战后的自由国际秩序下,外国投资保护是由国际法和国际制度给予的。但当前经济的去全球化正在让位于制度和法律的去全球化。与外国投资有关的国内法,特别是国内投资法,正在取代《国际投资协定》,成为规范跨境贸易和投资流动的标准手段。本文比较了国际和国内投资法以及新旧国内投资法中投资者保护的实体和程序标准,重点是非歧视和争端解决。IEL转向国内法并不总是意味着大多数国家将自己与国际经济隔绝的趋势。相反,它通常是为了实现与LIO类似的目的,但使用不同的方法。文章讨论了国际(经济)目的法的替代政治经济框架,其基石是好客权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Trade Review
World Trade Review Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Alienated Twins – The Overlooked Private Law Dimension of Global Trade and Investment Governance The Demise of Globalization and Rise of Industrial Policy: Caveat Emptor Smart Cities and International Trade Law Norm Entrepreneurship in Digital Trade: The Singapore-led Wave of Digital Trade Agreements Accounting for Carbon Pricing in Third Countries Under the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1