Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet in midlife and development in weight or waist circumference after five years in a Danish cohort

Fie Langmann , Daniel B. Ibsen , Anne Tjønneland , Anja Olsen , Kim Overvad , Christina C. Dahm
{"title":"Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet in midlife and development in weight or waist circumference after five years in a Danish cohort","authors":"Fie Langmann ,&nbsp;Daniel B. Ibsen ,&nbsp;Anne Tjønneland ,&nbsp;Anja Olsen ,&nbsp;Kim Overvad ,&nbsp;Christina C. Dahm","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The EAT-Lancet reference diet has been proposed as a healthy dietary pattern to reduce food-related climate impacts, but little is known regarding associations with bodyweight development. This study investigated adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet in midlife and development in weight and waist circumference (WC) after five years.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort recruited participants in 1993–1997. At baseline, data on diet, lifestyle, and anthropometry were collected. Participants self-reported weight and WC five years later. In total, 44,194 participants were included in analyses of weight (43,678 for WC). Baseline adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was scored 0–14 points. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate associations between the EAT-Lancet diet and development in weight and WC after five years. Poisson regression was used to estimate risk ratios (RR) of obesity (≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) or elevated WC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was not associated with follow-up weight, adjusting for baseline weight and confounders (11–14 vs 0–7 points β: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.27, 0.11 kg), but was associated with lower follow-up WC adjusting for baseline WC and confounders (β: -0.38, 95% CI: -0.69, -0.07 cm), and was associated with lower risk of obesity and elevated WC (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.98, and 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93, 0.96, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet in midlife was associated with lower WC but not weight after five years follow up, taking baseline into account. Our findings suggest that greater adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet does not contribute to development of obesity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772653323000552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The EAT-Lancet reference diet has been proposed as a healthy dietary pattern to reduce food-related climate impacts, but little is known regarding associations with bodyweight development. This study investigated adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet in midlife and development in weight and waist circumference (WC) after five years.

Design

The Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort recruited participants in 1993–1997. At baseline, data on diet, lifestyle, and anthropometry were collected. Participants self-reported weight and WC five years later. In total, 44,194 participants were included in analyses of weight (43,678 for WC). Baseline adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was scored 0–14 points. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate associations between the EAT-Lancet diet and development in weight and WC after five years. Poisson regression was used to estimate risk ratios (RR) of obesity (≥30 kg/m2) or elevated WC.

Results

Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was not associated with follow-up weight, adjusting for baseline weight and confounders (11–14 vs 0–7 points β: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.27, 0.11 kg), but was associated with lower follow-up WC adjusting for baseline WC and confounders (β: -0.38, 95% CI: -0.69, -0.07 cm), and was associated with lower risk of obesity and elevated WC (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.98, and 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93, 0.96, respectively).

Conclusion

Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet in midlife was associated with lower WC but not weight after five years follow up, taking baseline into account. Our findings suggest that greater adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet does not contribute to development of obesity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦队列中中年坚持EAT柳叶刀饮食和五年后体重或腰围的发展
EAT-Lancet参考饮食被认为是一种健康的饮食模式,可以减少与食物有关的气候影响,但人们对其与体重发展的关系知之甚少。这项研究调查了在中年坚持EAT-Lancet饮食和五年后体重和腰围(WC)的发展。丹麦饮食、癌症和健康队列研究于1993-1997年招募参与者。基线时,收集饮食、生活方式和人体测量数据。参与者在五年后自我报告体重和体重。总共有44194名参与者被纳入体重分析(43678名参与者被纳入体重分析)。对EAT-Lancet饮食的基线依从性得分为0-14分。使用多元线性回归来估计EAT-Lancet饮食与五年后体重和体重发展之间的关系。使用泊松回归估计肥胖(≥30 kg/m2)或WC升高的风险比(RR)。结果:坚持EAT-Lancet饮食与基线体重和混杂因素调整后的随访体重无关(11-14分对0-7分β: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.27, 0.11 kg),但与基线体重和混杂因素调整后的较低随访体重相关(β: -0.38, 95% CI: -0.69, -0.07 cm),并与较低的肥胖风险和较高的体重相关(RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.98和0.95,95% CI: 0.93, 0.96)。结论在考虑基线的5年随访中,中年坚持EAT-Lancet饮食与较低的腰围有关,但与体重无关。我们的研究结果表明,更坚持EAT-Lancet饮食并不会导致肥胖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Fishing with skis, digging with noodles: Resolving task-and-tool mismatches in efforts to advance health equity Blurred vision: The ophthalmological effect of smog in Pakistan Correlation between fall experience and life functions among community-dwelling older adults in Japan Breaking barriers: A gender-based quota system in nursing school admission in Bangladesh Success rates and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among treatment-naïve patients in Davao City, Philippines: A ten-year retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1