Právní jednání rodiče při správě jmění dítěte aneb jak otočit podstatu a účel zákona o 180°

Q4 Social Sciences Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.14712/23366478.2022.19
Michaela Zuklínová
{"title":"Právní jednání rodiče při správě jmění dítěte aneb jak otočit podstatu a účel zákona o 180°","authors":"Michaela Zuklínová","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2022.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The administration of the child’s assets and debts as a part of parental responsibility is one of the important duties and rights of parents, as well as the duty and the right of the legal representation of the child. This article is trying to compare the original legal text of the relevant law, i.e., the article 898 of the Czech Civil Code (at the time of the codification of the Civil Code) and new legal text (when law No. 192/2021 has novelized the provision in question). The problem/question in the protection of the property rights of a child is researched above all. Several legal acts of parents (as the legal guardians of a child) need the court’s approval. According to the original law, a parent’s legal act without the court’s approval has been refused. Is it was watched as a legal nothing (putative act or no-act). In the view of constitutional law, this way of protecting a child was the maximum possible choice. But the new law has diminished the protection to the minimum, because now such imperfect parent’s legal act may be declared invalid by a court only if the child (or another person) invokes the invalidity (voidable act), and – above all – if the legal act has no harmful consequence for the child, a court does not have to declare the invalidity of such legal act at all.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The administration of the child’s assets and debts as a part of parental responsibility is one of the important duties and rights of parents, as well as the duty and the right of the legal representation of the child. This article is trying to compare the original legal text of the relevant law, i.e., the article 898 of the Czech Civil Code (at the time of the codification of the Civil Code) and new legal text (when law No. 192/2021 has novelized the provision in question). The problem/question in the protection of the property rights of a child is researched above all. Several legal acts of parents (as the legal guardians of a child) need the court’s approval. According to the original law, a parent’s legal act without the court’s approval has been refused. Is it was watched as a legal nothing (putative act or no-act). In the view of constitutional law, this way of protecting a child was the maximum possible choice. But the new law has diminished the protection to the minimum, because now such imperfect parent’s legal act may be declared invalid by a court only if the child (or another person) invokes the invalidity (voidable act), and – above all – if the legal act has no harmful consequence for the child, a court does not have to declare the invalidity of such legal act at all.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母在子女财产管理中的法律行为或如何将法律的本质和目的转变180°
子女财产债务管理作为父母责任的一部分,是父母的重要义务和权利之一,也是子女法定代理人的义务和权利。本文试图比较相关法律的原始法律文本,即捷克民法典第898条(民法典编纂时)和新法律文本(第192/2021号法律对相关条款进行了小说化)。首先研究了保护儿童财产权的问题。父母(作为孩子的法定监护人)的一些法律行为需要法院的批准。根据原法律,未经法院批准的父母的法律行为被拒绝。它被视为法律上的无为(假定的行为或不作为)。从宪法的角度来看,这种保护儿童的方式是最大可能的选择。但是新的法律已经把这种保护减少到最低限度,因为现在这种不完美的父母的法律行为只有在孩子(或另一个人)援引无效(可撤销行为)的情况下才可能被法院宣布无效,而且-最重要的是-如果法律行为对孩子没有有害的后果,法院根本不必宣布这种法律行为无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Z vědeckého života: zpráva z mezinárodní vědecké konference Opravné systémy a opravné prostředky v trestním řízení Koncept kontradiktornosti v trestním řízení Problematické aspekty základních zásad v návrhu rekodifikace trestního procesu Využitelnost dohody o vině a trestu a prohlášení viny v jednotlivých stadiích trestního řízení Zajištění informací a věcí v návrhu nového trestního řádu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1