Comparison of cell type annotation algorithms for revealing immune response of COVID-19

Congmin Xu, Huyun Lu, Peng Qiu
{"title":"Comparison of cell type annotation algorithms for revealing immune response of COVID-19","authors":"Congmin Xu, Huyun Lu, Peng Qiu","doi":"10.3389/fsysb.2022.1026686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When analyzing scRNA-seq data with clustering algorithms, annotating the clusters with cell types is an essential step toward biological interpretation of the data. Annotations can be performed manually using known cell type marker genes. Annotations can also be automated using knowledge-driven or data-driven machine learning algorithms. Majority of cell type annotation algorithms are designed to predict cell types for individual cells in a new dataset. Since biological interpretation of scRNA-seq data is often made on cell clusters rather than individual cells, several algorithms have been developed to annotate cell clusters. In this study, we compared five cell type annotation algorithms, Azimuth, SingleR, Garnett, scCATCH, and SCSA, which cover the spectrum of knowledge-driven and data-driven approaches to annotate either individual cells or cell clusters. We applied these five algorithms to two scRNA-seq datasets of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) samples from COVID-19 patients and healthy controls, and evaluated their annotation performance. From this comparison, we observed that methods for annotating individual cells outperformed methods for annotation cell clusters. We applied the cell-based annotation algorithm Azimuth to the two scRNA-seq datasets to examine the immune response during COVID-19 infection. Both datasets presented significant depletion of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), where differential expression in this cell type and pathway analysis revealed strong activation of type I interferon signaling pathway in response to the infection.","PeriodicalId":73109,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in systems biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in systems biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsysb.2022.1026686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When analyzing scRNA-seq data with clustering algorithms, annotating the clusters with cell types is an essential step toward biological interpretation of the data. Annotations can be performed manually using known cell type marker genes. Annotations can also be automated using knowledge-driven or data-driven machine learning algorithms. Majority of cell type annotation algorithms are designed to predict cell types for individual cells in a new dataset. Since biological interpretation of scRNA-seq data is often made on cell clusters rather than individual cells, several algorithms have been developed to annotate cell clusters. In this study, we compared five cell type annotation algorithms, Azimuth, SingleR, Garnett, scCATCH, and SCSA, which cover the spectrum of knowledge-driven and data-driven approaches to annotate either individual cells or cell clusters. We applied these five algorithms to two scRNA-seq datasets of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) samples from COVID-19 patients and healthy controls, and evaluated their annotation performance. From this comparison, we observed that methods for annotating individual cells outperformed methods for annotation cell clusters. We applied the cell-based annotation algorithm Azimuth to the two scRNA-seq datasets to examine the immune response during COVID-19 infection. Both datasets presented significant depletion of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), where differential expression in this cell type and pathway analysis revealed strong activation of type I interferon signaling pathway in response to the infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎免疫反应细胞类型注释算法的比较
当使用聚类算法分析scRNA-seq数据时,用细胞类型注释聚类是对数据进行生物学解释的重要一步。可以使用已知的细胞类型标记基因手动进行注释。注释也可以使用知识驱动或数据驱动的机器学习算法进行自动化。大多数细胞类型注释算法被设计用于预测新数据集中单个细胞的细胞类型。由于scRNA-seq数据的生物学解释通常是在细胞簇而不是单个细胞上进行的,因此已经开发了几种算法来注释细胞簇。在这项研究中,我们比较了五种细胞类型注释算法,Azimuth、SingleR、Garnett、scCATCH和SCSA,它们涵盖了知识驱动和数据驱动的方法,用于注释单个细胞或细胞簇。我们将这五种算法应用于新冠肺炎患者和健康对照的外周血单核细胞(PBMC)样本的两个scRNA-seq数据集,并评估了它们的注释性能。从这一比较中,我们观察到,注释单个单元格的方法优于注释单元格簇的方法。我们将基于细胞的注释算法Azimuth应用于两个scRNA-seq数据集,以检查新冠肺炎感染期间的免疫反应。两个数据集都显示浆细胞样树突状细胞(pDC)的显著耗竭,其中该细胞类型的差异表达和通路分析显示,I型干扰素信号通路对感染的反应强烈激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transporter annotations are holding up progress in metabolic modeling Life’s building blocks: the modular path to multiscale complexity Coupling quantitative systems pharmacology modelling to machine learning and artificial intelligence for drug development: its pAIns and gAIns Predicting chronic responses to calcium channel blockade with a virtual population of African Americans with hypertensive chronic kidney disease Building an Adverse Outcome Pathway network for COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1