Rethinking ‘regional processing’ in Europe: lessons from the Comprehensive Plan of Action (CPA) for indochinese refugees

Q1 Arts and Humanities Australian Journal of Human Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1323238X.2023.2197708
Riona Moodley
{"title":"Rethinking ‘regional processing’ in Europe: lessons from the Comprehensive Plan of Action (CPA) for indochinese refugees","authors":"Riona Moodley","doi":"10.1080/1323238X.2023.2197708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the Syrian refugee crisis in 2015–2016, debate has persisted over the creation of more accessible legal pathways for asylum seekers to reach Europe, particularly during large-scale and protracted refugee situations. This has included the possibility of the European Union processing the protection claims of asylum seekers in transit countries or regions of origin before they reach Europe. Assuming that such arrangements are made without prejudice to the right to claim territorial asylum in Europe or elsewhere, in theory, regional processing could help reduce the risks associated with the onward movement of asylum seekers and migrants and facilitate more predictable movements of people during large-scale refugee situations. But what could or should a ‘regional processing’ framework entail for it to be compatible with international human rights law principles? This paper considers this question by drawing practical insights from the Comprehensive Plan of Action for Indochinese Refugees, which was the first international attempt to introduce region-wide processing during the Indochinese refugee crisis in the 1970s–1980s. Through an evaluation of the Plan, this paper explores how ‘regional processing’ might be re-conceptualised to expand protection pathways to Europe and inform a protection-orientated approach to international cooperation on asylum and migration.","PeriodicalId":37430,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Human Rights","volume":"29 1","pages":"141 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2023.2197708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since the Syrian refugee crisis in 2015–2016, debate has persisted over the creation of more accessible legal pathways for asylum seekers to reach Europe, particularly during large-scale and protracted refugee situations. This has included the possibility of the European Union processing the protection claims of asylum seekers in transit countries or regions of origin before they reach Europe. Assuming that such arrangements are made without prejudice to the right to claim territorial asylum in Europe or elsewhere, in theory, regional processing could help reduce the risks associated with the onward movement of asylum seekers and migrants and facilitate more predictable movements of people during large-scale refugee situations. But what could or should a ‘regional processing’ framework entail for it to be compatible with international human rights law principles? This paper considers this question by drawing practical insights from the Comprehensive Plan of Action for Indochinese Refugees, which was the first international attempt to introduce region-wide processing during the Indochinese refugee crisis in the 1970s–1980s. Through an evaluation of the Plan, this paper explores how ‘regional processing’ might be re-conceptualised to expand protection pathways to Europe and inform a protection-orientated approach to international cooperation on asylum and migration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自2015-2016年叙利亚难民危机以来,关于为寻求庇护者创造更便利的合法途径进入欧洲的争论一直在持续,特别是在大规模和旷日持久的难民局势中。这包括欧洲联盟可能在寻求庇护者抵达欧洲之前处理他们在过境国或原籍地区提出的保护要求。假设作出这种安排时不损害在欧洲或其他地方要求领土庇护的权利,理论上,区域处理可以帮助减少与寻求庇护者和移徙者继续流动有关的风险,并在大规模难民情况下促进更可预测的人员流动。但是,“区域处理”框架能够或应该具备哪些条件,才能使其与国际人权法原则相一致?通过对该计划的评估,本文探讨了如何重新定义“区域处理”,以扩大通往欧洲的保护途径,并为庇护和移民方面的国际合作提供以保护为导向的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Human Rights
Australian Journal of Human Rights Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Human Rights (AJHR) is Australia’s first peer reviewed journal devoted exclusively to human rights development in Australia, the Asia-Pacific region and internationally. The journal aims to raise awareness of human rights issues in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region by providing a forum for scholarship and discussion. The AJHR examines legal aspects of human rights, along with associated philosophical, historical, economic and political considerations, across a range of issues, including aboriginal ownership of land, racial discrimination and vilification, human rights in the criminal justice system, children’s rights, homelessness, immigration, asylum and detention, corporate accountability, disability standards and free speech.
期刊最新文献
An end to the patchwork quilt? The guarded potential of the PJCHR’s inquiry into Australia’s human rights framework The challenge of 21st-century populism Populism and Human Rights in a Turbulent Era , edited by Alison Brysk, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, 206 pp., $212.10 (hardback), ISBN 9781802209532 Human rights in Palestine: from self-determination to governance Contested rights, unequal citizens: how the Constitution presents paradoxes and hopes of equality for India’s Muslim minority Refracting rights from the margins: re-shifting, re-scripting, re-inventing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1