Extensive Left Atrial Low-Voltage Area During Initial Ablation is Associated with A Poor Clinical Outcome Even Following Multiple Procedures.

T. Kanda, M. Masuda, M. Asai, O. Iida, S. Okamoto, T. Ishihara, Kiyonori Nanto, T. Tsujimura, Y. Matsuda, Y. Hata, H. Uematsu, T. Mano
{"title":"Extensive Left Atrial Low-Voltage Area During Initial Ablation is Associated with A Poor Clinical Outcome Even Following Multiple Procedures.","authors":"T. Kanda, M. Masuda, M. Asai, O. Iida, S. Okamoto, T. Ishihara, Kiyonori Nanto, T. Tsujimura, Y. Matsuda, Y. Hata, H. Uematsu, T. Mano","doi":"10.22541/AU.161547823.37636408/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nSome patients fail to respond to persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures and ablation strategies, including low voltage area (LVA)-guided, linear, and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation procedures. We hypothesized that LVA extent could predict non-responseto Pe AF catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures.\n\n\nMethods\nThis study included 510 patients undergoing initial ablation procedures for PeAF. LVAs were defined as regions with bipolar peak-to-peak voltages of <0.50 mV after PVI during sinus rhythm. Patients were categorized by LVA size into groups A(0-5 cm2), B (5-20 cm2), and C (over 20 cm2). The primary endpoint was AF-free survival after the last procedure.\n\n\nResults\nDuring a median follow-up of 25 (17, 36) months, AF recurrence was observed in 101 (20%) patients after 1.4±0.6 ablation procedures (maximum 4). Comparison of clinical outcomes after multiple procedures in the three groups showed that the results depended on the extent of LVA. Multivariate analysis of AF-free survival after the last procedure showed that LVAs > 20 cm2 was an independent factor associated with AF recurrence after the final procedure(Hazard ratio, 7.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.91 to 21.67, P <0.001).\n\n\nConclusions\nExtensive LVA after initial PVI was associated with poor clinical benefit despite multiple catheter based ablations.","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":"14 2 1","pages":"20200491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22541/AU.161547823.37636408/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Some patients fail to respond to persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures and ablation strategies, including low voltage area (LVA)-guided, linear, and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation procedures. We hypothesized that LVA extent could predict non-responseto Pe AF catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures. Methods This study included 510 patients undergoing initial ablation procedures for PeAF. LVAs were defined as regions with bipolar peak-to-peak voltages of <0.50 mV after PVI during sinus rhythm. Patients were categorized by LVA size into groups A(0-5 cm2), B (5-20 cm2), and C (over 20 cm2). The primary endpoint was AF-free survival after the last procedure. Results During a median follow-up of 25 (17, 36) months, AF recurrence was observed in 101 (20%) patients after 1.4±0.6 ablation procedures (maximum 4). Comparison of clinical outcomes after multiple procedures in the three groups showed that the results depended on the extent of LVA. Multivariate analysis of AF-free survival after the last procedure showed that LVAs > 20 cm2 was an independent factor associated with AF recurrence after the final procedure(Hazard ratio, 7.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.91 to 21.67, P <0.001). Conclusions Extensive LVA after initial PVI was associated with poor clinical benefit despite multiple catheter based ablations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初始消融术时左心房低压面积过大,即使多次手术后临床结果也不佳。
背景:尽管有多种治疗方法和消融策略,包括低压区(LVA)引导、线性和复杂心房电图(CFAE)引导的消融方法,一些患者对持续性房颤(PeAF)导管消融没有反应。我们假设LVA范围可以预测Pe房颤导管消融无反应,尽管有多种手术。方法本研究纳入510例PeAF初始消融手术患者。lva被定义为双极峰对峰电压为20 cm2的区域,是最终手术后AF复发的独立因素(风险比,7.94;95%置信区间为2.91 ~ 21.67,P <0.001)。结论尽管多次导管消融,初始PVI后扩大LVA仍与较差的临床疗效相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of atrial fibrillation
Journal of atrial fibrillation Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare and the use of robotic technology - The Robotic Magnetic Navigation, to manage them in the field of electrophysiology | A single-center experience with case studies Atrial Fibrillation with Controlled Ventricular Rate and New-onset Heart Failure: Atypical Presentation, Worse Prognosis Psychological Stress Associated – Vagally Mediated Atrial Fibrillation: Personal Observation of a Possible Subtype Long-Term Rhythm and Echocardiographic Outcomes of Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction After DC Cardioversion For for Atrial Fibrillation Association Between New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1