T. Kanda, M. Masuda, M. Asai, O. Iida, S. Okamoto, T. Ishihara, Kiyonori Nanto, T. Tsujimura, Y. Matsuda, Y. Hata, H. Uematsu, T. Mano
{"title":"Extensive Left Atrial Low-Voltage Area During Initial Ablation is Associated with A Poor Clinical Outcome Even Following Multiple Procedures.","authors":"T. Kanda, M. Masuda, M. Asai, O. Iida, S. Okamoto, T. Ishihara, Kiyonori Nanto, T. Tsujimura, Y. Matsuda, Y. Hata, H. Uematsu, T. Mano","doi":"10.22541/AU.161547823.37636408/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nSome patients fail to respond to persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures and ablation strategies, including low voltage area (LVA)-guided, linear, and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation procedures. We hypothesized that LVA extent could predict non-responseto Pe AF catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures.\n\n\nMethods\nThis study included 510 patients undergoing initial ablation procedures for PeAF. LVAs were defined as regions with bipolar peak-to-peak voltages of <0.50 mV after PVI during sinus rhythm. Patients were categorized by LVA size into groups A(0-5 cm2), B (5-20 cm2), and C (over 20 cm2). The primary endpoint was AF-free survival after the last procedure.\n\n\nResults\nDuring a median follow-up of 25 (17, 36) months, AF recurrence was observed in 101 (20%) patients after 1.4±0.6 ablation procedures (maximum 4). Comparison of clinical outcomes after multiple procedures in the three groups showed that the results depended on the extent of LVA. Multivariate analysis of AF-free survival after the last procedure showed that LVAs > 20 cm2 was an independent factor associated with AF recurrence after the final procedure(Hazard ratio, 7.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.91 to 21.67, P <0.001).\n\n\nConclusions\nExtensive LVA after initial PVI was associated with poor clinical benefit despite multiple catheter based ablations.","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":"14 2 1","pages":"20200491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22541/AU.161547823.37636408/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background
Some patients fail to respond to persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures and ablation strategies, including low voltage area (LVA)-guided, linear, and complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation procedures. We hypothesized that LVA extent could predict non-responseto Pe AF catheter ablation in spite of multiple procedures.
Methods
This study included 510 patients undergoing initial ablation procedures for PeAF. LVAs were defined as regions with bipolar peak-to-peak voltages of <0.50 mV after PVI during sinus rhythm. Patients were categorized by LVA size into groups A(0-5 cm2), B (5-20 cm2), and C (over 20 cm2). The primary endpoint was AF-free survival after the last procedure.
Results
During a median follow-up of 25 (17, 36) months, AF recurrence was observed in 101 (20%) patients after 1.4±0.6 ablation procedures (maximum 4). Comparison of clinical outcomes after multiple procedures in the three groups showed that the results depended on the extent of LVA. Multivariate analysis of AF-free survival after the last procedure showed that LVAs > 20 cm2 was an independent factor associated with AF recurrence after the final procedure(Hazard ratio, 7.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.91 to 21.67, P <0.001).
Conclusions
Extensive LVA after initial PVI was associated with poor clinical benefit despite multiple catheter based ablations.