The Complexity of Determining Indicative Evidence in The Rape Criminal Act

N. Yuliartini, Wita Setyaningrum, D. Mangku
{"title":"The Complexity of Determining Indicative Evidence in The Rape Criminal Act","authors":"N. Yuliartini, Wita Setyaningrum, D. Mangku","doi":"10.31603/variajusticia.v17i1.4368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of rape cases in Indonesia has resulted in social unrest, especially among women and children. Sometimes, judges have difficulty determining indicative evidence of rape cases. This study aims to analyze the strength of the evidence as consideration for judges in the criminal case of rape. This research is normative legal research. The data used in this research is secondary data obtained through a literature study and analyzed juridically normative based on a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used in this research are primary and secondary legal materials. The study results show that rape is the most difficult crime to prove, considering that this kind of crime is often committed in places where it is difficult to find witnesses. Judges experience difficulties in concretely explaining evidence. Even in court practice often experience difficulties in applying it. These difficulties can then have implications for the decision that the judge will release because the decision is dominated by the judge's verdict, which may be excessive. Indicative evidence is the only indirect evidence among other evidence formulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code.","PeriodicalId":31904,"journal":{"name":"Varia Justicia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Varia Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v17i1.4368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of rape cases in Indonesia has resulted in social unrest, especially among women and children. Sometimes, judges have difficulty determining indicative evidence of rape cases. This study aims to analyze the strength of the evidence as consideration for judges in the criminal case of rape. This research is normative legal research. The data used in this research is secondary data obtained through a literature study and analyzed juridically normative based on a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used in this research are primary and secondary legal materials. The study results show that rape is the most difficult crime to prove, considering that this kind of crime is often committed in places where it is difficult to find witnesses. Judges experience difficulties in concretely explaining evidence. Even in court practice often experience difficulties in applying it. These difficulties can then have implications for the decision that the judge will release because the decision is dominated by the judge's verdict, which may be excessive. Indicative evidence is the only indirect evidence among other evidence formulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强奸罪中指示性证据认定的复杂性
印度尼西亚强奸案的增加导致了社会动荡,特别是在妇女和儿童中。有时,法官难以确定强奸案件的指示性证据。本研究旨在分析证据的强度,作为法官在强奸刑事案件中考虑的因素。本研究属于规范法学研究。本研究中使用的数据是通过文献研究获得的二手数据,并基于法定和概念方法分析了法律规范。本研究使用的法律资料分为一级法律资料和二级法律资料。研究结果表明,强奸是最难证明的犯罪,因为这类犯罪通常发生在难以找到证人的地方。法官在具体解释证据方面遇到困难。即使在法庭实践中也经常遇到应用困难。然后,这些困难可能对法官将作出的决定产生影响,因为决定是由法官的判决决定的,这可能是过分的。指示性证据是我国刑事诉讼法第一百八十四条规定的证据中唯一的间接证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Police Brutality as Human Rights Violation: A Study Case of Black Lives Matter Legal Reconstruction of Indonesian Banking Laws: Challenges and Opportunities for Digital Bank Regulation Government Capacity to Guarantee Halal Product from Micro, Small, And Medium Enterprises in Kebumen Environmental Court and Principle of Good Environmental Governance in Enforcing Environmental Law Technology Company Merger and Acquisition: a Study of Indonesian and European Union Competition Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1