Scoping reviews and rapid reviews

IF 6.4 2区心理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-18 DOI:10.1080/1750984X.2021.1964095

C. Sabiston, Madison F. Vani, Melissa de Jonge, Amy E. Nesbitt

{"title":"Scoping reviews and rapid reviews","authors":"C. Sabiston, Madison F. Vani, Melissa de Jonge, Amy E. Nesbitt","doi":"10.1080/1750984X.2021.1964095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Scoping reviews and rapid reviews are intentional approaches to systematically synthesize research. In sport and exercise psychology, scoping reviews can summarize information to describe what is known on a relevant topic. Rapid reviews offer accelerated knowledge synthesis through a streamlined timely and cost-effective approach that is directed and guided by stakeholders. Both scoping and rapid reviews are used to synthesize the literature, and also to describe and assess conceptual, theoretical, and methodological trends, identify gaps in research and practice, and inform future sport and exercise psychology research and practice directions. We offer evidence-based and field-specific guidelines to conduct scoping reviews and rapid reviews. These types of syntheses in sport and exercise psychology are important for advancing research and practice and highlight the value of collaborations with key stakeholders. Our guidelines will help with the uniformity and dependability of scoping and rapid reviews while also advancing the impact and value of this type of research.","PeriodicalId":47658,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"91 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1964095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT Scoping reviews and rapid reviews are intentional approaches to systematically synthesize research. In sport and exercise psychology, scoping reviews can summarize information to describe what is known on a relevant topic. Rapid reviews offer accelerated knowledge synthesis through a streamlined timely and cost-effective approach that is directed and guided by stakeholders. Both scoping and rapid reviews are used to synthesize the literature, and also to describe and assess conceptual, theoretical, and methodological trends, identify gaps in research and practice, and inform future sport and exercise psychology research and practice directions. We offer evidence-based and field-specific guidelines to conduct scoping reviews and rapid reviews. These types of syntheses in sport and exercise psychology are important for advancing research and practice and highlight the value of collaborations with key stakeholders. Our guidelines will help with the uniformity and dependability of scoping and rapid reviews while also advancing the impact and value of this type of research.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

范围审查和快速审查

范围审查和快速审查是系统地综合研究的有意方法。在运动和运动心理学中，范围界定评论可以总结信息来描述相关主题的已知内容。快速审查通过由利益攸关方指导和指导的精简、及时和具有成本效益的方法，加速了知识的综合。范围界定和快速回顾都用于综合文献，也用于描述和评估概念、理论和方法趋势，确定研究和实践中的差距，并为未来的体育和运动心理学研究和实践方向提供信息。我们提供基于证据和特定领域的指导方针来进行范围审查和快速审查。这些类型的运动和运动心理学的综合对于推进研究和实践非常重要，并突出了与关键利益相关者合作的价值。我们的指南将有助于范围界定和快速审查的一致性和可靠性，同时也提高了这类研究的影响和价值。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

17.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology is the first scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes critical reviews of research literature in sport and exercise psychology. Typically, these reviews evaluate relevant conceptual and methodological issues in the field and provide a critique of the strengths and weaknesses of empirical studies that address common themes or hypotheses. The reviews present summaries of, and conclusions about, the current state of knowledge concerning topics of interest, as well as assessments of relevant unresolved issues and future trends. Reviews of research literature on theories, topics and issues that are at the interface with mainstream psychology are especially welcome.