Validation of an accelerometer-based gait assessment: Establishing test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and predictive validity for concussion symptom endorsement

L. Lecci, K. Dugan, Ken Zeiger, J. Keith, S. Taravath, W. Tseh, Mark Williams
{"title":"Validation of an accelerometer-based gait assessment: Establishing test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and predictive validity for concussion symptom endorsement","authors":"L. Lecci, K. Dugan, Ken Zeiger, J. Keith, S. Taravath, W. Tseh, Mark Williams","doi":"10.1177/20597002231157947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gait accelerometer (sensor) technology has proven effective in predicting several medical outcomes, but less is known regarding its prediction of concussion symptoms relative to conventional measures of gait and balance. To establish the reliability and validity of gait accelerometer data. We first examine test-retest reliability and the impact of footwear and walking surfaces on gait. We then examine the convergent validity between gait accelerometer data and the NIH 4-meter gait test. Finally, we compare gait accelerometer data to gait speed and balance measures for predicting concussion symptoms. Study 1 used a crossover study design with 60 participants to evaluate retest reliability and examine the effects of footwear (shoes/no-shoes) and walking surface (tile floor/grass) on gait accelerometer data. Study 2 employed a cross-sectional design with 1008 participants to assess gait accelerometer correlations with NIH 4-meter gait and the prediction of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) concussion symptoms relative to previously validated gait and balance measures. Retest reliability (4-day average retest interval) for the no shoes/tile surface condition ranged from .72-.91 (mean = .80). Significant effects of footwear and especially walking surface revealed by Analysis of Variances (ANOVAs) on gait accelerometer data for the power, stride, balance, and symmetry domains indicate the need to standardize these variables. Gait accelerometer data correlates significantly with NIH 4-meter gait scores. Regression analyses found that gait accelerometer data predicts CDC concussion symptom endorsement, outperforming the BESS and NIH 4-meter gait at least three-fold. When standardized on footwear and walking surface, gait accelerometers achieve strong test-retest reliability, converge with established measures of gait speed, and are superior to established measures of gait speed and balance when predicting concussion symptoms. Gait accelerometers represent a rapid tool for collecting additional gait information to quantify the behavioral sequelae of concussion and potentially inform return-to-play decision-making.","PeriodicalId":92541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of concussion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597002231157947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Gait accelerometer (sensor) technology has proven effective in predicting several medical outcomes, but less is known regarding its prediction of concussion symptoms relative to conventional measures of gait and balance. To establish the reliability and validity of gait accelerometer data. We first examine test-retest reliability and the impact of footwear and walking surfaces on gait. We then examine the convergent validity between gait accelerometer data and the NIH 4-meter gait test. Finally, we compare gait accelerometer data to gait speed and balance measures for predicting concussion symptoms. Study 1 used a crossover study design with 60 participants to evaluate retest reliability and examine the effects of footwear (shoes/no-shoes) and walking surface (tile floor/grass) on gait accelerometer data. Study 2 employed a cross-sectional design with 1008 participants to assess gait accelerometer correlations with NIH 4-meter gait and the prediction of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) concussion symptoms relative to previously validated gait and balance measures. Retest reliability (4-day average retest interval) for the no shoes/tile surface condition ranged from .72-.91 (mean = .80). Significant effects of footwear and especially walking surface revealed by Analysis of Variances (ANOVAs) on gait accelerometer data for the power, stride, balance, and symmetry domains indicate the need to standardize these variables. Gait accelerometer data correlates significantly with NIH 4-meter gait scores. Regression analyses found that gait accelerometer data predicts CDC concussion symptom endorsement, outperforming the BESS and NIH 4-meter gait at least three-fold. When standardized on footwear and walking surface, gait accelerometers achieve strong test-retest reliability, converge with established measures of gait speed, and are superior to established measures of gait speed and balance when predicting concussion symptoms. Gait accelerometers represent a rapid tool for collecting additional gait information to quantify the behavioral sequelae of concussion and potentially inform return-to-play decision-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于加速度计的步态评估的验证:建立脑震荡症状认可的重测可靠性、收敛有效性和预测有效性
步态加速度计(传感器)技术已被证明在预测几种医疗结果方面是有效的,但相对于步态和平衡的传统测量,它对脑震荡症状的预测知之甚少。建立步态加速度计数据的可靠性和有效性。我们首先考察了重新测试的可靠性以及鞋类和行走表面对步态的影响。然后,我们检验了步态加速度计数据和NIH 4米步态测试之间的收敛有效性。最后,我们将步态加速度计数据与步态速度和平衡测量数据进行比较,以预测脑震荡症状。研究1采用了一项有60名参与者的交叉研究设计,以评估重新测试的可靠性,并检查鞋类(鞋/无鞋)和行走表面(瓷砖地板/草地)对步态加速度计数据的影响。研究2采用了1008名参与者的横断面设计,评估步态加速度计与NIH 4米步态的相关性,以及疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)脑震荡症状相对于先前验证的步态和平衡测量的预测。无鞋/瓷砖表面条件下的重新测试可靠性(4天平均重新测试间隔)范围为.72-.91(平均值 = .80)。方差分析(ANOVA)揭示了鞋类,尤其是行走表面对步态加速度计功率、步幅、平衡和对称域数据的显著影响,表明需要标准化这些变量。步态加速度计数据与NIH 4米步态评分显著相关。回归分析发现,步态加速度计数据可以预测CDC脑震荡症状认可,比BESS和NIH 4米步态至少好三倍。当在鞋类和步行表面上进行标准化时,步态加速度计实现了很强的测试-重新测试可靠性,与步态速度的既定测量值一致,并且在预测脑震荡症状时优于步态速度和平衡的既定测量。步态加速度计是一种快速工具,用于收集额外的步态信息,以量化脑震荡的行为后遗症,并可能为重返赛场的决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Do concussed and non-concussed head trauma individuals have similar symptoms? A retrospective chart review of chronic post-concussive symptomatology Providing a clearer insight into how sport-related concussion and physical pain impact mental health, cognition, and quality of life Parents’/guardians’ experiences with their adolescents’ prolonged recovery from a sport-related concussion A mixed methods investigation into athletic trainer and dietitian's nutrition practices for sport-related concussion patients Using eye-tracking technology to measure cognitive function in mild traumatic brain injury: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1