Streaming USA

IF 0.9 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Creative Industries Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/17510694.2023.2221554
G. Harper
{"title":"Streaming USA","authors":"G. Harper","doi":"10.1080/17510694.2023.2221554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"on March 15, 2023, the U.S. National Endowment for the arts (NEa) and the U.S. Bureau of Economic analysis (BEa) released data on the 2021 contribution of the arts and cultural sector to the U.S. economy. For the first time in history, web publishing and streaming services were announced as the largest arts and cultural industrial sub-sector in america. the reasons for this are obvious, with clear growth in this particular Ci sub-sector during the primary years of the CoVid-19 global pandemic (2019–2023), when access to venues where live performances take place was substantially reduced, and purchasing Ci products in general was pushed online and into the home. according to the report, even by the end of 2021, ‘22 of the 35’ US creative industries sub-sectors had already returned to or exceeded pre-pandemic levels of economic activity. those that lagged or (and here’s the crux of the report worthy of consideration) remained behind the economic level they had been at before the pandemic included ‘performing arts organizations (e.g. theatre, dance, and opera companies, music groups; and circuses), and arts-related construction’. again, the logic of this, given the impact of pandemic restrictions on public gatherings is obvious. it is reported this March that the thirteen US Ci sub-sectors that had not returned to at least 2019 levels by the end of 2021 also included independent artists (of all kinds) in what is otherwise a NEa/BEH report highlighting economic growth. in fact, it is reported that ‘the overall (the US) arts economy in 2021 represented 4.4% of GdP, or just over $1.0 trillion—a new high-water mark’. With such a level of economic positivity in this report, connected conspicuously with the noteworthy growth in the web publishing and streaming services sub-sector, one question arises. Either a question for now, or one for the years to come. that is, if ‘only 18% of establishments in this industry [web publishing and streaming] are nonprofit’, does this rise in this sub-sector’s predominance also represent a long-term shift away from non-profit creative industries in the United States? in addition, if Ci production involving independent artists also experienced a lower rate of economic growth than prior to the pandemic is that a trend that will continue? the creative industries sector has for generations been powered by both individual arts practitioners and industrial entities. When assessing the sector, it has long been necessary to consider profit and non-profit organizations, individual professionals, hobbyists, the self-employed, non-profits groups (often community, education or health related), national corporations and global conglomerates, not least given the impact of cultural activities on individuals, communities, regions and nations – and indeed on how we all relate to each other beyond our cultural or national identities. Ci is, fundamentally, about human exchange and even with the advent of various forms of artificial intelligence (ai) Ci remains grounded in how humans relate to","PeriodicalId":38664,"journal":{"name":"Creative Industries Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"113 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creative Industries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2023.2221554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

on March 15, 2023, the U.S. National Endowment for the arts (NEa) and the U.S. Bureau of Economic analysis (BEa) released data on the 2021 contribution of the arts and cultural sector to the U.S. economy. For the first time in history, web publishing and streaming services were announced as the largest arts and cultural industrial sub-sector in america. the reasons for this are obvious, with clear growth in this particular Ci sub-sector during the primary years of the CoVid-19 global pandemic (2019–2023), when access to venues where live performances take place was substantially reduced, and purchasing Ci products in general was pushed online and into the home. according to the report, even by the end of 2021, ‘22 of the 35’ US creative industries sub-sectors had already returned to or exceeded pre-pandemic levels of economic activity. those that lagged or (and here’s the crux of the report worthy of consideration) remained behind the economic level they had been at before the pandemic included ‘performing arts organizations (e.g. theatre, dance, and opera companies, music groups; and circuses), and arts-related construction’. again, the logic of this, given the impact of pandemic restrictions on public gatherings is obvious. it is reported this March that the thirteen US Ci sub-sectors that had not returned to at least 2019 levels by the end of 2021 also included independent artists (of all kinds) in what is otherwise a NEa/BEH report highlighting economic growth. in fact, it is reported that ‘the overall (the US) arts economy in 2021 represented 4.4% of GdP, or just over $1.0 trillion—a new high-water mark’. With such a level of economic positivity in this report, connected conspicuously with the noteworthy growth in the web publishing and streaming services sub-sector, one question arises. Either a question for now, or one for the years to come. that is, if ‘only 18% of establishments in this industry [web publishing and streaming] are nonprofit’, does this rise in this sub-sector’s predominance also represent a long-term shift away from non-profit creative industries in the United States? in addition, if Ci production involving independent artists also experienced a lower rate of economic growth than prior to the pandemic is that a trend that will continue? the creative industries sector has for generations been powered by both individual arts practitioners and industrial entities. When assessing the sector, it has long been necessary to consider profit and non-profit organizations, individual professionals, hobbyists, the self-employed, non-profits groups (often community, education or health related), national corporations and global conglomerates, not least given the impact of cultural activities on individuals, communities, regions and nations – and indeed on how we all relate to each other beyond our cultural or national identities. Ci is, fundamentally, about human exchange and even with the advent of various forms of artificial intelligence (ai) Ci remains grounded in how humans relate to
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国流媒体
2023年3月15日,美国国家艺术基金会(NEa)和美国经济分析局(BEa)发布了2021年艺术和文化部门对美国经济贡献的数据。网络出版和流媒体服务有史以来第一次被宣布为美国最大的艺术和文化产业子部门。原因是显而易见的,在新冠肺炎全球大流行的最初几年(2019年至2023年),这一特定的Ci子行业出现了明显的增长,当时现场演出场地的使用大幅减少,购买Ci产品通常被推到网上和家中。报告称,即使到2021年底,美国35个创意产业子行业中的22个已经恢复或超过疫情前的经济活动水平。那些落后于或(这是值得考虑的报告的关键)仍落后于疫情前的经济水平的组织包括“表演艺术组织(如剧院、舞蹈和歌剧公司、音乐团体和马戏团)以及与艺术相关的建筑”。同样,考虑到疫情限制对公众集会的影响,这其中的逻辑是显而易见的。据今年3月报道,截至2021年底尚未恢复到至少2019年水平的13个美国词细分行业也包括独立艺术家(各种类型),这在NEa/BEH报告中强调了经济增长。事实上,据报道,“2021年美国整体艺术经济占GdP的4.4%,略高于1.0万亿美元,创下新高”。本报告中的经济积极性如此之高,与网络出版和流媒体服务子行业的显著增长密切相关,由此产生了一个问题。要么是现在的问题,要么是未来几年的问题。也就是说,如果“这个行业(网络出版和流媒体)只有18%的机构是非营利的”,那么这个细分行业的主导地位的上升是否也代表着美国从非营利创意产业的长期转变?此外,如果独立艺术家参与的词创作也经历了比疫情前更低的经济增长率,这种趋势还会继续吗?几代人以来,创意产业一直由个体艺术从业者和产业实体共同推动。在评估该行业时,长期以来,有必要考虑营利和非营利组织、个人专业人员、业余爱好者、个体经营者、非营利团体(通常是社区、教育或健康相关团体)、国家公司和全球企业集团,尤其是考虑到文化活动对个人、社区、,地区和国家——事实上,在我们的文化或民族身份之外,我们是如何相互联系的。从根本上讲,词是关于人类交流的,即使随着各种形式的人工智能的出现,词仍然以人类如何与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Creative Industries Journal
Creative Industries Journal Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
27.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The scope of the Creative Industries Journal is global, primarily aimed at those studying and practicing activities which have their origin in individual creativity, skill and talent, and which have a potential for wealth creation. These activities primarily take place in advertising, architecture, the art and antiques market, crafts, design, fashion, film, interactive leisure software, music, the performing arts, publishing, television and radio.
期刊最新文献
Cultural, creative and collective recovery: exploring a creative Worker income Guarantee (CWIG) The arduous art of empowering visual artists: why the Dutch digital sales platform Patty Morgan ultimately failed Nigeria’s creative industries: issues, challenges, and way forward for the software subsector Artificial Creative Intelligence (ACI) A Writing Chance: adjusting the lens on social class and diversity in the UK publishing industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1