Poverty and Intrahousehold Gender Inequality in Time Use in Ghana

IF 3.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Feminist Economics Pub Date : 2022-07-25 DOI:10.1080/13545701.2022.2080854
Emmanuel Orkoh, C. Claassen, D. Blaauw
{"title":"Poverty and Intrahousehold Gender Inequality in Time Use in Ghana","authors":"Emmanuel Orkoh, C. Claassen, D. Blaauw","doi":"10.1080/13545701.2022.2080854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How gender-based differences in time spent on household and labor-market activities affect men’s and women’s well-being is of growing interest to economists and policymakers. In many countries, women perform more unpaid work than men and have fewer opportunities to lift themselves out of poverty through education and training. This article analyzes the relationship between poverty and gender inequality in time use among monogamous couples in Ghana. A key finding is that women in poor households face heterogeneous levels of inequality in time use, depending on the type of activity, inequality in time use, and characteristics of the household. The study highlights the importance of devising gender-aware policies and altering entrenched cultural stereotypes, thereby helping to reduce inequality between men and women. This should afford more women the opportunity to play a more productive and economically meaningful role in the formal labor market. HIGHLIGHTS In Ghana, poor households face significantly higher gender inequality in time use compared to rich households. Levels of time-use inequality for poor women vary in relation to activity and household characteristics. Policies should prioritize reducing poverty to alleviate intrahousehold inequality. Gender-aware policies should address norms that impede women’s labor market participation and autonomous time allocation.","PeriodicalId":47715,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":"221 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2022.2080854","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT How gender-based differences in time spent on household and labor-market activities affect men’s and women’s well-being is of growing interest to economists and policymakers. In many countries, women perform more unpaid work than men and have fewer opportunities to lift themselves out of poverty through education and training. This article analyzes the relationship between poverty and gender inequality in time use among monogamous couples in Ghana. A key finding is that women in poor households face heterogeneous levels of inequality in time use, depending on the type of activity, inequality in time use, and characteristics of the household. The study highlights the importance of devising gender-aware policies and altering entrenched cultural stereotypes, thereby helping to reduce inequality between men and women. This should afford more women the opportunity to play a more productive and economically meaningful role in the formal labor market. HIGHLIGHTS In Ghana, poor households face significantly higher gender inequality in time use compared to rich households. Levels of time-use inequality for poor women vary in relation to activity and household characteristics. Policies should prioritize reducing poverty to alleviate intrahousehold inequality. Gender-aware policies should address norms that impede women’s labor market participation and autonomous time allocation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳的贫困与时间使用中的家庭内性别不平等
经济学家和政策制定者越来越感兴趣的是,基于性别的家庭和劳动力市场活动时间差异如何影响男性和女性的福祉。在许多国家,妇女从事的无偿工作比男子多,通过教育和培训摆脱贫困的机会更少。本文分析了加纳一夫一妻制夫妇在时间利用方面的贫困与性别不平等之间的关系。一项重要发现是,贫困家庭中的妇女在时间利用方面面临不同程度的不平等,这取决于活动类型、时间利用不平等和家庭特征。这项研究强调了制定具有性别意识的政策和改变根深蒂固的文化陈规定型观念的重要性,从而有助于减少男女之间的不平等。这应使更多的妇女有机会在正式劳动力市场上发挥更有生产力和更有经济意义的作用。在加纳,与富裕家庭相比,贫困家庭在时间利用方面面临着更大的性别不平等。贫穷妇女的时间利用不平等程度因活动和家庭特点而异。政策应优先考虑减少贫困,以减轻家庭内部的不平等。具有性别意识的政策应解决阻碍妇女参与劳动力市场和自主分配时间的规范问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Economics
Feminist Economics Multiple-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Feminist Economics is a peer-reviewed journal that provides an open forum for dialogue and debate about feminist economic perspectives. By opening new areas of economic inquiry, welcoming diverse voices, and encouraging critical exchanges, the journal enlarges and enriches economic discourse. The goal of Feminist Economics is not just to develop more illuminating theories but to improve the conditions of living for all children, women, and men. Feminist Economics: -Advances feminist inquiry into economic issues affecting the lives of children, women, and men -Examines the relationship between gender and power in the economy and the construction and legitimization of economic knowledge -Extends feminist theoretical, historical, and methodological contributions to economics and the economy -Offers feminist insights into the underlying constructs of the economics discipline and into the historical, political, and cultural context of economic knowledge -Provides a feminist rethinking of theory and policy in diverse fields, including those not directly related to gender -Stimulates discussions among diverse scholars worldwide and from a broad spectrum of intellectual traditions, welcoming cross-disciplinary and cross-country perspectives, especially from countries in the South
期刊最新文献
Dispossession after War: A Feminist Political Economy Perspective Analysis of Seasonal Time Poverty and Aspirations in the Upper East Region of Ghana The Value of Work: The Gendered Outcomes of Organizational Wage Reforms Feminist Ideologies at Work: Culture, Collectivism, and Entrepreneurship among Disadvantaged Women in India Women’s Colleges and Economics Major Choice: Evidence from Wellesley College Applicants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1