Different land-use intensities and their susceptibility to soil erosion

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Agrokemia es Talajtan Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1556/0088.2018.00004
Boglárka Keller, J. Szabó, C. Centeri, G. Jakab, Z. Szalai
{"title":"Different land-use intensities and their susceptibility to soil erosion","authors":"Boglárka Keller, J. Szabó, C. Centeri, G. Jakab, Z. Szalai","doi":"10.1556/0088.2018.00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Adaptation is the most important strategy to reduce the effect of climate change and soil erosion. During this process adequate, rational land use is necessary to ensure climate resilience. Therefore, the main objective in this study was to evaluate the susceptibility of different land use intensities (arable land and grassland) to soil erosion. The rainfall simulation method is a good tool to measure and estimate soil erosion in situ. The comparative measurements were carried out in the field with a Shower Power-02 simulator on 6 m2 plots in Gerézdpuszta, where the slope angles were ~8% and the simulated rainfall events had high intensities (~70-96 mm h−1). The runoff and soil loss were significantly higher from arable land. The runoff-infiltration ratio and runoff coefficient showed lower infiltration capacity in the case of arable land. On average, the suspended sediment loads were tenfold higher under intensive land use. In the case of grassland a moderate increase in infiltration was observed due to higher rainfall intensity, as also reported in the literature. The rainfall simulation method provides good data for soil loss estimations.","PeriodicalId":34893,"journal":{"name":"Agrokemia es Talajtan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrokemia es Talajtan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/0088.2018.00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Adaptation is the most important strategy to reduce the effect of climate change and soil erosion. During this process adequate, rational land use is necessary to ensure climate resilience. Therefore, the main objective in this study was to evaluate the susceptibility of different land use intensities (arable land and grassland) to soil erosion. The rainfall simulation method is a good tool to measure and estimate soil erosion in situ. The comparative measurements were carried out in the field with a Shower Power-02 simulator on 6 m2 plots in Gerézdpuszta, where the slope angles were ~8% and the simulated rainfall events had high intensities (~70-96 mm h−1). The runoff and soil loss were significantly higher from arable land. The runoff-infiltration ratio and runoff coefficient showed lower infiltration capacity in the case of arable land. On average, the suspended sediment loads were tenfold higher under intensive land use. In the case of grassland a moderate increase in infiltration was observed due to higher rainfall intensity, as also reported in the literature. The rainfall simulation method provides good data for soil loss estimations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同土地利用强度及其对土壤侵蚀的敏感性
适应是减少气候变化和土壤侵蚀影响的最重要战略。在这一过程中,充分、合理的土地利用对于确保气候适应性是必要的。因此,本研究的主要目的是评估不同土地利用强度(耕地和草地)对土壤侵蚀的敏感性。降雨模拟方法是现场测量和估算土壤侵蚀的一种很好的工具。比较测量是在Gerézdpuszta的6 m2地块上使用Shower Power-02模拟器进行的,该地块的坡度角约为8%,模拟降雨事件强度较高(约70-96 mm h−1)。耕地的径流量和土壤流失显著增加。在耕地情况下,径流入渗比和径流系数表现出较低的入渗能力。平均而言,在土地集约利用的情况下,悬浮泥沙量要高出十倍。在草原的情况下,由于较高的降雨强度,观察到渗透适度增加,文献中也有报道。降雨模拟方法为土壤损失估算提供了良好的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrokemia es Talajtan
Agrokemia es Talajtan Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original papers with English summaries, reports on conferences, book reviews, contributed by Hungarian and foreign authors in the field of soil science, agricultural chemistry, soil microbiology and soil biochemistry.Papers and reviews only in Hungarian.
期刊最新文献
Németh Tamás 1952–2023 Üzenet az Agrokémia és Talajtan 72. évfolyamának olvasóihoz A települési és mezőgazdasági vízgazdálkodás azbeszt okozta kockázati tényezői a krizotil-azbeszt vonatkozásában Loch Jakab 1932–2023 ’Sigmond Elek (1873–1939)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1