Evaluating Youth Drop-In Programs: The Utility of Process Evaluation Methods

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation Pub Date : 2019-05-24 DOI:10.3138/CJPE.42976
Derek Chechak, J. M. Dunlop, M. Holosko
{"title":"Evaluating Youth Drop-In Programs: The Utility of Process Evaluation Methods","authors":"Derek Chechak, J. M. Dunlop, M. Holosko","doi":"10.3138/CJPE.42976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In North America, neighbourhood youth centres typically off er essential community-based programs to disadvantaged and marginalized populations. In addition to providing pro-social and supportive environments, they provide a host of educational and skill-development opportunities and interventions that build self-esteem, increase positive life relationships and experiences, and address social determinants of health. However, evaluators of such centres often have to work with moving changes in temporal components (i.e., service users, services, programs, and outcomes) that are unique and idiosyncratic to the mandate of the centre. Although there is an abundance of research on youth programs in general, there is a void in the literature on drop-in programs specifically, which this study aims to address. Th e lack of empirical research in this area inhibits knowledge about the processes of these centres. For this reason, the article concludes that process evaluation methods may be effectively used to substantiate the practice skills, knowledge, and managerial competencies of those responsible for program implementation. ","PeriodicalId":43924,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/CJPE.42976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In North America, neighbourhood youth centres typically off er essential community-based programs to disadvantaged and marginalized populations. In addition to providing pro-social and supportive environments, they provide a host of educational and skill-development opportunities and interventions that build self-esteem, increase positive life relationships and experiences, and address social determinants of health. However, evaluators of such centres often have to work with moving changes in temporal components (i.e., service users, services, programs, and outcomes) that are unique and idiosyncratic to the mandate of the centre. Although there is an abundance of research on youth programs in general, there is a void in the literature on drop-in programs specifically, which this study aims to address. Th e lack of empirical research in this area inhibits knowledge about the processes of these centres. For this reason, the article concludes that process evaluation methods may be effectively used to substantiate the practice skills, knowledge, and managerial competencies of those responsible for program implementation. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估青少年参与计划:过程评估方法的效用
在北美,社区青年中心通常向弱势和边缘人群提供必要的社区项目。除了提供亲社会和支持性环境外,它们还提供大量教育和技能发展机会和干预措施,以建立自尊,增加积极的生活关系和经验,并解决健康的社会决定因素。然而,这些中心的评估人员往往必须处理时间组成部分(即服务用户、服务、方案和结果)的变化,这些变化对中心的任务来说是独特和特殊的。虽然有大量的研究,一般的青少年计划,有一个空白的文献,特别是在drop-in计划,这是本研究的目的是解决。在这一领域缺乏实证研究抑制了对这些中心过程的了解。由于这个原因,本文得出结论,过程评估方法可以有效地用于证实那些负责程序实施的人的实践技能、知识和管理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation
Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Arts-Based Evaluation Process Evaluation of a Cooking Circle Program in the Arctic: Developing the Mukluk Logic Model and Identifying Key Enablers and Barriers for Program Implementation Community-Based Evaluation When Localizing Sustainable Development Goals Employing Mixed-Methods Citation Analysis to Investigate Transnational Influence in Evaluation Theory Indigenous Feminist Evaluation Methods: A Case Study in “My Two Aunties”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1