Determinants of the vertical distribution of the phyllosphere differ between microbial groups and the epi- and endosphere

IF 3.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Phytobiomes Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-14 DOI:10.1094/pbiomes-02-23-0013-r
H. Schimann, C. Vacher, S. Coste, Elianne Louisanna, Tania Fort, L. Zinger
{"title":"Determinants of the vertical distribution of the phyllosphere differ between microbial groups and the epi- and endosphere","authors":"H. Schimann, C. Vacher, S. Coste, Elianne Louisanna, Tania Fort, L. Zinger","doi":"10.1094/pbiomes-02-23-0013-r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The determinants of phyllosphere microbial communities are drawing much attention given their functional importance for their plant host fitness and health. Identifying these determinants remain challenging in neotropical forests, considering the diversity of the tree hosts and the strong vertical heterogeneity of abiotic condition within the canopy and at the scale of the leaf. Here, we studied fungal and bacterial communities living in the endophytic and epiphytic phyllosphere in tree species across vertical gradients, from the top of the canopy to the ground. We used DNA metabarcoding to characterize microbial communities and measured abiotic variables and foliar traits to characterize environmental heterogeneity. The assembly of fungal communities was more driven by deterministic processes as compared to bacteria, endo- and epiphytic communities being similarly shaped by the host identity and unmeasured parameters. In contrast, in bacterial communities, the relative importance of deterministic processes decreased from endophytic to epiphytic communities. Bacterial epi- and endophytic communities were partly and differently determined by the position within the canopy, the host identity and leaf traits, suggesting an effect of the vertical gradient and a stronger selection in the inner tissues of the leaf than on its surface. The tree host exerts a selective pressure on microbial communities but the leaf as microhabitat contributes also significantly to the assembly of microbial communities. Discrepancies exist between Fungi and Bacteria that probably reflect different life-history trait and ecological strategies, emphasizing the need to study these communities jointly if we are to fully understand plant-phyllosphere interactions.","PeriodicalId":48504,"journal":{"name":"Phytobiomes Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytobiomes Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/pbiomes-02-23-0013-r","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The determinants of phyllosphere microbial communities are drawing much attention given their functional importance for their plant host fitness and health. Identifying these determinants remain challenging in neotropical forests, considering the diversity of the tree hosts and the strong vertical heterogeneity of abiotic condition within the canopy and at the scale of the leaf. Here, we studied fungal and bacterial communities living in the endophytic and epiphytic phyllosphere in tree species across vertical gradients, from the top of the canopy to the ground. We used DNA metabarcoding to characterize microbial communities and measured abiotic variables and foliar traits to characterize environmental heterogeneity. The assembly of fungal communities was more driven by deterministic processes as compared to bacteria, endo- and epiphytic communities being similarly shaped by the host identity and unmeasured parameters. In contrast, in bacterial communities, the relative importance of deterministic processes decreased from endophytic to epiphytic communities. Bacterial epi- and endophytic communities were partly and differently determined by the position within the canopy, the host identity and leaf traits, suggesting an effect of the vertical gradient and a stronger selection in the inner tissues of the leaf than on its surface. The tree host exerts a selective pressure on microbial communities but the leaf as microhabitat contributes also significantly to the assembly of microbial communities. Discrepancies exist between Fungi and Bacteria that probably reflect different life-history trait and ecological strategies, emphasizing the need to study these communities jointly if we are to fully understand plant-phyllosphere interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叶层垂直分布的决定因素在微生物群以及内外层之间存在差异
叶层微生物群落的决定因素因其对植物宿主适应性和健康的功能重要性而备受关注。考虑到树木宿主的多样性以及树冠内和叶片尺度上非生物条件的强烈垂直异质性,在新热带森林中识别这些决定因素仍然具有挑战性。在这里,我们研究了从树冠顶部到地面的垂直梯度中生活在树种内生和附生叶层中的真菌和细菌群落。我们使用DNA代谢编码来表征微生物群落,并测量非生物变量和叶片性状来表征环境异质性。与细菌相比,真菌群落的组装更多地受到确定性过程的驱动,内生和附生群落也同样受到宿主身份和未测量参数的影响。相反,在细菌群落中,确定性过程的相对重要性从内生群落降低到附生群落。细菌表生和内生群落在一定程度上不同于冠层内的位置、寄主身份和叶片性状,这表明垂直梯度的影响以及叶片内部组织比表面组织更强的选择。树宿主对微生物群落施加选择性压力,但作为微生境的叶子也对微生物群落的组装有重要贡献。真菌和细菌之间存在差异,这可能反映了不同的生活史特征和生态策略,强调如果我们要充分了解植物叶层相互作用,就需要联合研究这些群落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Genetically similar Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni strains and associated phage display phenotypic and genotypic variation across 35 years Abiotic stress reorganizes rhizosphere and endosphere network structure of Sorghum bicolor A Specific Resistance Gene to Leptosphaeria maculans, Rlm11, Has a Limited Impact on Brassica napus Mycobiota Compared with Plant Compartment or Cropping Season Effects Fungal communities shift with soybean cyst nematode abundance in soils The root-endophytic microbiome shifts under drought in high-performing sorghum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1