Can China’s Belt and Road Initiative be Reconciled with the EU’s Multilateral Approaches to International Law?

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW China and WTO Review Pub Date : 2020-09-30 DOI:10.14330/cwr.2020.6.2.02
E. Petersmann, Giuseppe Martinico
{"title":"Can China’s Belt and Road Initiative be Reconciled with the EU’s Multilateral Approaches to International Law?","authors":"E. Petersmann, Giuseppe Martinico","doi":"10.14330/cwr.2020.6.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a potential cause of trade, investment, financial, maritime, energy trade and intellectual property disputes. In so doing this contribution discusses the increasing “systemic rivalry” among authoritarian, neoliberal and ordo-liberal conceptions of international economic law and the resulting legal problems in the settlement of BRI disputes inside the EU countries, whose courts may not recognize arbitration awards by Chinese arbitration institutions and may hold Chinese investors accountable for disregard for human and labor rights in their BRI investment inside the EU countries.","PeriodicalId":40992,"journal":{"name":"China and WTO Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China and WTO Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14330/cwr.2020.6.2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a potential cause of trade, investment, financial, maritime, energy trade and intellectual property disputes. In so doing this contribution discusses the increasing “systemic rivalry” among authoritarian, neoliberal and ordo-liberal conceptions of international economic law and the resulting legal problems in the settlement of BRI disputes inside the EU countries, whose courts may not recognize arbitration awards by Chinese arbitration institutions and may hold Chinese investors accountable for disregard for human and labor rights in their BRI investment inside the EU countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国的“一带一路”倡议能否与欧盟的多边国际法方针协调一致?
本文重点探讨了中国“一带一路”倡议倡议作为贸易、投资、金融、海事、能源贸易和知识产权争端的潜在原因。在这样做的过程中,这篇文章讨论了威权主义、新自由主义和秩序自由主义国际经济法概念之间日益加剧的“系统性竞争”,以及在解决欧盟国家内部“一带一路”争端方面由此产生的法律问题,其法院可能不承认中国仲裁机构的仲裁裁决,并可能追究中国投资者在欧盟国家“一带一路”投资中无视人权和劳工权利的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
US-China Trade Relations: Tectonic Changes and Political Risk in the Global System – National Security, Industrial Policy, and Protectionism Trade Relations among the BRICS Countries: An Indian Perspective RCEP and Indo-Pacific Region: Implications for India’s Act East Policy Academic Research and Development of China Studies at SOAS in London The Legal Framework of Patent Valuation: A Comparative View between the US, the PRC and Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1