{"title":"Communicating qualitative uncertainty in data visualization","authors":"G. Panagiotidou, A. Vande Moere","doi":"10.1075/idj.22014.pan","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Qualitative uncertainty refers to the implicit and underlying issues that are imbued in data, such as the\n circumstances of its collection, its storage or even biases and assumptions made by its authors. Although such uncertainty can\n jeopardize the validity of the data analysis, it is often overlooked in visualizations, due to it being indirect and\n non-quantifiable. In this paper we present two case studies within the digital humanities in which we examined how to integrate\n uncertainty in our visualization designs. Using these cases as a starting point we propose four considerations for data\n visualization research in relation to indirect, qualitative uncertainty: (1) we suggest that uncertainty in visualization should\n be examined within its socio-technological context, (2) we propose the use of interaction design patterns to design for it, (3) we\n argue for more attention to be paid to the data generation process in the humanities, and (4) we call for the further development\n of participatory activities specifically catered for understanding qualitative uncertainties. While our findings are grounded in\n the humanities, we believe that these considerations can be beneficial for other settings where indirect uncertainty plays an\n equally prevalent role.","PeriodicalId":35109,"journal":{"name":"Information Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22014.pan","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Qualitative uncertainty refers to the implicit and underlying issues that are imbued in data, such as the
circumstances of its collection, its storage or even biases and assumptions made by its authors. Although such uncertainty can
jeopardize the validity of the data analysis, it is often overlooked in visualizations, due to it being indirect and
non-quantifiable. In this paper we present two case studies within the digital humanities in which we examined how to integrate
uncertainty in our visualization designs. Using these cases as a starting point we propose four considerations for data
visualization research in relation to indirect, qualitative uncertainty: (1) we suggest that uncertainty in visualization should
be examined within its socio-technological context, (2) we propose the use of interaction design patterns to design for it, (3) we
argue for more attention to be paid to the data generation process in the humanities, and (4) we call for the further development
of participatory activities specifically catered for understanding qualitative uncertainties. While our findings are grounded in
the humanities, we believe that these considerations can be beneficial for other settings where indirect uncertainty plays an
equally prevalent role.
期刊介绍:
Information Design Journal (IDJ) is a peer reviewed international journal that bridges the gap between research and practice in information design. IDJ is a platform for discussing and improving the design, usability, and overall effectiveness of ‘content put into form’ — of verbal and visual messages shaped to meet the needs of particular audiences. IDJ offers a forum for sharing ideas about the verbal, visual, and typographic design of print and online documents, multimedia presentations, illustrations, signage, interfaces, maps, quantitative displays, websites, and new media. IDJ brings together ways of thinking about creating effective communications for use in contexts such as workplaces, hospitals, airports, banks, schools, or government agencies.