Postoperative emergency department visits for pain after outpatient orthopaedic surgery: did rescheduling hydrocodone make a difference?

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Current Orthopaedic Practice Pub Date : 2023-03-03 DOI:10.1097/BCO.0000000000001201
Christine Wassef, A. Frangenberg, Haeun Lee, Nwamaka Iloani, Christopher Bates, Amanda C. Pientka, William F. Pientka
{"title":"Postoperative emergency department visits for pain after outpatient orthopaedic surgery: did rescheduling hydrocodone make a difference?","authors":"Christine Wassef, A. Frangenberg, Haeun Lee, Nwamaka Iloani, Christopher Bates, Amanda C. Pientka, William F. Pientka","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In 2014, the United States Drug Enforcement Agency rescheduled hydrocodone from schedule III to II to mitigate the opiate crisis in America. Hydrocodone has long served as common pain medication after outpatient orthopaedic surgical procedures in the United States. We hypothesize rescheduling of hydrocodone would correlate with an increase in postoperative emergency department visits for pain. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all outpatient orthopaedic procedures and identified all patients who subsequently presented to our emergency department for postoperative pain for the one calendar year prior to and after the rescheduling of hydrocodone. Results: We identified 2984 orthopaedic procedures and 3193 emergency department visits for postoperative pain across all surgical specialties. 875 orthopaedic procedures occurred prior to hydrocodone rescheduling with 48 postoperative ED visits for pain (5.4%). 2109 procedures occurred after the rescheduling of hydrocodone with 123 ED visits for pain postoperatively (5.8%). 199 patients presented to the ED for postoperative pain, for a total of 345 visits. The median postoperative time to emergency room visit for the pre-rescheduling group was 6.5 days versus 4.0 days post-rescheduling. Conclusions: We identified statistically significant differences in postoperative medication and prescribed amounts. We identified no difference in the proportion of patients that went to the emergency room by timeframe relative to hydrocodone rescheduling, nor did we identify a difference between samples in terms of gender, race, insurance status, and comorbid conditions. Increased restriction on hydrocodone prescribing did not increase emergency department visits for pain after outpatient orthopaedic surgery. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic III.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"123 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2014, the United States Drug Enforcement Agency rescheduled hydrocodone from schedule III to II to mitigate the opiate crisis in America. Hydrocodone has long served as common pain medication after outpatient orthopaedic surgical procedures in the United States. We hypothesize rescheduling of hydrocodone would correlate with an increase in postoperative emergency department visits for pain. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all outpatient orthopaedic procedures and identified all patients who subsequently presented to our emergency department for postoperative pain for the one calendar year prior to and after the rescheduling of hydrocodone. Results: We identified 2984 orthopaedic procedures and 3193 emergency department visits for postoperative pain across all surgical specialties. 875 orthopaedic procedures occurred prior to hydrocodone rescheduling with 48 postoperative ED visits for pain (5.4%). 2109 procedures occurred after the rescheduling of hydrocodone with 123 ED visits for pain postoperatively (5.8%). 199 patients presented to the ED for postoperative pain, for a total of 345 visits. The median postoperative time to emergency room visit for the pre-rescheduling group was 6.5 days versus 4.0 days post-rescheduling. Conclusions: We identified statistically significant differences in postoperative medication and prescribed amounts. We identified no difference in the proportion of patients that went to the emergency room by timeframe relative to hydrocodone rescheduling, nor did we identify a difference between samples in terms of gender, race, insurance status, and comorbid conditions. Increased restriction on hydrocodone prescribing did not increase emergency department visits for pain after outpatient orthopaedic surgery. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic III.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊骨科手术后疼痛的急诊就诊:重新安排氢可酮的使用是否有影响?
背景:2014年,美国缉毒局将氢可酮从附表III重新安排为附表II,以缓解美国的鸦片危机。Hydrocodone长期以来一直是美国整形外科门诊手术后常见的止痛药。我们假设氢可酮的重新安排与术后疼痛急诊就诊次数的增加有关。方法:我们对所有门诊骨科手术进行了回顾性审查,并确定了在重新安排氢可酮治疗前后的一个日历年内,因术后疼痛而向急诊科就诊的所有患者。结果:我们确定了2984例整形外科手术和3193例急诊科就诊,以治疗所有外科专业的术后疼痛。875例整形外科手术发生在氢可酮重新安排之前,48例术后因疼痛就诊(5.4%)。2109例手术发生在水可酮重新计划之后,123例术后疼痛就诊(5.8%)。199名患者因术后疼痛就医,共345次就诊。重新安排前组的中位术后急诊室就诊时间为6.5天,而重新安排后为4.0天。结论:我们发现术后用药和处方量存在统计学上的显著差异。相对于氢可酮的重新安排,我们没有发现按时间段去急诊室的患者比例有差异,也没有发现样本在性别、种族、保险状况和共病条件方面的差异。增加对氢可酮处方的限制并没有增加骨科门诊手术后疼痛的急诊就诊次数。证据级别:治疗III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning review of hand surgery literature Jumpy stump syndrome treated by targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR): a case report and review of the literature Impact of COVID-19 on total hip arthroplasty: results from California state inpatient database Osteotomy via the prone transpsoas approach for lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine Orthopaedic surgery residency program ranking and the current state of leadership: what are the characteristics of the leaders in the “Top-tier” programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1