Adaptability versus certainty in a carbon emissions reduction regime: An assessment of the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law Pub Date : 2020-07-04 DOI:10.1111/reel.12354
Diarmuid Torney, R. O’Gorman
{"title":"Adaptability versus certainty in a carbon emissions reduction regime: An assessment of the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework","authors":"Diarmuid Torney, R. O’Gorman","doi":"10.1111/reel.12354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Paris Agreement moves away from top-down agreed national targets towards a bottom-up system in which each party submits regular nationally determined contributions (NDCs) The Agreement outlines a highly adaptable process in which, every five years, parties are required to update their NDCs, which must represent a progression on their existing contribution This article analyses the extent to which the European Union?s 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework has created an adaptable structure that reflects the Paris Agreement?s ratchet mechanism The article contrasts this approach with the carbon budget process adopted under the United Kingdom?s Climate Change Act The article assesses the respective advantages and disadvantages of creating a system where targets are easily increased on a medium-term basis allowing responsiveness to changed circumstances such as scientific data indicating the need for more rapid emission reductions, versus a stable system that provides greater certainty for economic actors","PeriodicalId":51681,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"167-176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/reel.12354","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The Paris Agreement moves away from top-down agreed national targets towards a bottom-up system in which each party submits regular nationally determined contributions (NDCs) The Agreement outlines a highly adaptable process in which, every five years, parties are required to update their NDCs, which must represent a progression on their existing contribution This article analyses the extent to which the European Union?s 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework has created an adaptable structure that reflects the Paris Agreement?s ratchet mechanism The article contrasts this approach with the carbon budget process adopted under the United Kingdom?s Climate Change Act The article assesses the respective advantages and disadvantages of creating a system where targets are easily increased on a medium-term basis allowing responsiveness to changed circumstances such as scientific data indicating the need for more rapid emission reductions, versus a stable system that provides greater certainty for economic actors
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳减排制度中的适应性与确定性:欧盟2030年气候与能源政策框架评估
《巴黎协定》从自上而下的商定国家目标转向自下而上的体系,在该体系中,每个缔约方定期提交国家自主贡献,这篇文章分析了欧盟在多大程度上?《2030年气候与能源政策框架》创造了一个反映《巴黎协定》的适应性结构?这篇文章将这种方法与英国时期采用的碳预算程序进行了对比?《气候变化法》这篇文章评估了建立一个在中期基础上容易提高目标的系统与一个为经济行为者提供更大确定性的稳定系统的各自优缺点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
National discretion or broadening acceptable interpretation? A comparative overview of the transposition and implementation of the Water Framework Directive The Czech Republic v Poland (Mine de Turów): Politics and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive The awkward relations between EU innovation policies and environmental law Towards the adoption of climate change acts in the Visegrad Group countries A quasi‐normative conflict: Resolving the tension between investment treaties and climate action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1