Agreement of body adiposity index (BAI), bioimpedance analysis and ultrasound scanning in determining body fat

E. Bondareva, O. I. Parfenteva, A. Vasileva, N. Kulemin, A. N. Gadzhiakhmedova, O. N. Kovaleva, B. A. Sultanova, N. Mazurina, E. Troshina
{"title":"Agreement of body adiposity index (BAI), bioimpedance analysis and ultrasound scanning in determining body fat","authors":"E. Bondareva, O. I. Parfenteva, A. Vasileva, N. Kulemin, A. N. Gadzhiakhmedova, O. N. Kovaleva, B. A. Sultanova, N. Mazurina, E. Troshina","doi":"10.14341/omet12992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The steadily increasing number of people with obesity requires the development of simple and accurate methodological approaches to assess the absolute and relative amount of body fat mass. The body adiposity index (BAI) is one of the indices proposed to assess the body fat percentage. However, the comparison analysis of common methods, i.e., of bio-electrical impedance analysis and ultrasound scanning, and BAI was not performed for the Russian population.AIM: Comparison analysis of the body fat percentage estimates by bio-electrical impedance analysis, ultrasound scanning, and body adiposity index in the group of adult male and females.MATERIALS AND METHODS: An examination of healthy males and females from Moscow was conducted. Height, weight, waist and hip circumferences were measured. The body fat percentage was obtained by bio-electrical impedance analysis — BIA (ABC-02 Medas), ultrasound scanning — US (BodyMetrixTM, IntelaMetrix), and body adiposity index.RESULTS: 263 females and 134 males aged 18 to 73 years participated in the study. Correlation coefficients between BAI values and the body fat percentage obtained by BIA and US were 0.749 and 0.763 (p<0.000), respectively. Comparison of body fat percentage measurements obtained by BAI, BIA and US showed the low agreement (ССС<0.90) between BAI and other methods in pooled sample as well as in the female and male groups. Comparison of the US and BAI methods revealed higher level of agreement (ССС=0.84 [0.80–0.86]) and no systematic bias. Lower level of agreement was obtained in the group of males.CONCLUSION: Conducted study allows to conclude that, at the individual level, BAI is not an appropriate method for estimating the body fat percentage relatively to other indirect methods. However, all three methods can be used in the group of pooled males and females when testing at the population level.","PeriodicalId":54700,"journal":{"name":"Obesity and Metabolism-Milan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity and Metabolism-Milan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14341/omet12992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The steadily increasing number of people with obesity requires the development of simple and accurate methodological approaches to assess the absolute and relative amount of body fat mass. The body adiposity index (BAI) is one of the indices proposed to assess the body fat percentage. However, the comparison analysis of common methods, i.e., of bio-electrical impedance analysis and ultrasound scanning, and BAI was not performed for the Russian population.AIM: Comparison analysis of the body fat percentage estimates by bio-electrical impedance analysis, ultrasound scanning, and body adiposity index in the group of adult male and females.MATERIALS AND METHODS: An examination of healthy males and females from Moscow was conducted. Height, weight, waist and hip circumferences were measured. The body fat percentage was obtained by bio-electrical impedance analysis — BIA (ABC-02 Medas), ultrasound scanning — US (BodyMetrixTM, IntelaMetrix), and body adiposity index.RESULTS: 263 females and 134 males aged 18 to 73 years participated in the study. Correlation coefficients between BAI values and the body fat percentage obtained by BIA and US were 0.749 and 0.763 (p<0.000), respectively. Comparison of body fat percentage measurements obtained by BAI, BIA and US showed the low agreement (ССС<0.90) between BAI and other methods in pooled sample as well as in the female and male groups. Comparison of the US and BAI methods revealed higher level of agreement (ССС=0.84 [0.80–0.86]) and no systematic bias. Lower level of agreement was obtained in the group of males.CONCLUSION: Conducted study allows to conclude that, at the individual level, BAI is not an appropriate method for estimating the body fat percentage relatively to other indirect methods. However, all three methods can be used in the group of pooled males and females when testing at the population level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体脂指数(BAI)、生物阻抗分析和超声扫描测定体脂的一致性
背景:肥胖人数的稳步增加需要开发简单准确的方法来评估身体脂肪量的绝对和相对量。身体肥胖指数(BAI)是评估身体脂肪百分比的指标之一。然而,没有对俄罗斯人群进行常见方法(即生物电阻抗分析和超声扫描)和BAI的比较分析。目的:通过生物电阻抗分析、超声扫描和体脂指数对成年男性和女性的体脂百分比估计进行比较分析。材料和方法:对来自莫斯科的健康男性和女性进行检查。测量身高、体重、腰围和臀围。体脂百分比通过生物电阻抗分析-BIA(ABC-02 Medas)、超声扫描-US(BodyMetrixTM,IntelaMetrix)和体脂指数获得。结果:263名女性和134名男性,年龄在18至73岁之间。BAI值与BIA和US获得的体脂百分比之间的相关系数分别为0.749和0.763(p<0.000)。通过BAI、BIA和US获得的体脂百分比测量结果的比较显示,在合并样本以及女性和男性组中,BAI与其他方法之间的一致性较低(ССС<0.90)。US和BAI方法的比较显示一致性较高(ССС=0.84[0.80–0.86]),且无系统偏差。男性组的一致性较低。结论:与其他间接方法相比,所进行的研究可以得出结论,在个体水平上,BAI不是一种评估体脂百分比的合适方法。然而,当在人群水平上进行测试时,这三种方法都可以在混合的雄性和雌性中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity and Metabolism-Milan
Obesity and Metabolism-Milan 医学-内分泌学与代谢
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical guidelines ‘Hyperprolactinemia’ (draft) The effect of intense exercise on muscle power and functional abilities of obese people Eating behavior features and preferred diets in underweight and obese young men Factors influencing the severity of COVID-19 course for patients with diabetes mellitus in tashkent: a retrospective cohort study Liraglutide in adolescents with simple obesity and gastrointestinal comorbidities: treatment experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1