Respect for patients’ rights in health facilities: experiences of patients during the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ghana

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare Pub Date : 2022-07-11 DOI:10.1108/ijhrh-12-2021-0207
Harrison Golo
{"title":"Respect for patients’ rights in health facilities: experiences of patients during the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ghana","authors":"Harrison Golo","doi":"10.1108/ijhrh-12-2021-0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to identify human rights violations of patients during the early periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ghana by investigating the experiences of people on how health-care professionals discharged their responsibilities during the time in question.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nExplanatory design of the mixed methods approach was adopted, with the intention of collecting both quantitative and qualitative data sequentially, and then integrating the results at the interpretation stage. The approach enriched the quality of data collected as it offered the advantage of shedding light on the primary motivations and reasons for attitudes and behaviours and helped to provide an in-depth understanding of how individuals interpret the happenings around them and their experiences. Thus, although some amount of quantitative method was used in the data collection, the core of this paper is based on the qualitative interpretations.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study reveals that health-care professionals, especially those in the Tema Metropolis, undermined certain fundamental human rights of patients during the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes failure to provide information to patients about treatment options and potential risks of medications; failure to seek the informed consent of patients before performing medical procedures; denial of access to medical files of patients for transfer; and inability or failure to provide medical ambulances services to patients on time.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAlthough many publications on human rights dimensions and health protective issues on COVID-19 pandemic are available on a global scale, still little information pertaining to experiences of individuals with health-care professionals during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in Ghana through the lens of patient’s rights exists. This paper, therefore, fills an important gap in health-care management information, critical for policy decision-making processes regarding patient’s rights in times of pandemic control.\n","PeriodicalId":14129,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhrh-12-2021-0207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to identify human rights violations of patients during the early periods of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ghana by investigating the experiences of people on how health-care professionals discharged their responsibilities during the time in question. Design/methodology/approach Explanatory design of the mixed methods approach was adopted, with the intention of collecting both quantitative and qualitative data sequentially, and then integrating the results at the interpretation stage. The approach enriched the quality of data collected as it offered the advantage of shedding light on the primary motivations and reasons for attitudes and behaviours and helped to provide an in-depth understanding of how individuals interpret the happenings around them and their experiences. Thus, although some amount of quantitative method was used in the data collection, the core of this paper is based on the qualitative interpretations. Findings The study reveals that health-care professionals, especially those in the Tema Metropolis, undermined certain fundamental human rights of patients during the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes failure to provide information to patients about treatment options and potential risks of medications; failure to seek the informed consent of patients before performing medical procedures; denial of access to medical files of patients for transfer; and inability or failure to provide medical ambulances services to patients on time. Originality/value Although many publications on human rights dimensions and health protective issues on COVID-19 pandemic are available on a global scale, still little information pertaining to experiences of individuals with health-care professionals during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in Ghana through the lens of patient’s rights exists. This paper, therefore, fills an important gap in health-care management information, critical for policy decision-making processes regarding patient’s rights in times of pandemic control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在卫生设施中尊重患者权利:加纳新冠肺炎大流行初期患者的经历
目的本文旨在通过调查人们在新冠肺炎大流行早期如何履行职责的经验,确定加纳患者在这段时间内侵犯人权的行为。设计/方法/方法采用混合方法的解释性设计,目的是依次收集定量和定性数据,然后在解释阶段整合结果。这种方法丰富了收集的数据的质量,因为它提供了揭示态度和行为的主要动机和原因的优势,并有助于深入了解个人如何解释周围发生的事情和他们的经历。因此,尽管在数据收集中使用了一些定量方法,但本文的核心是基于定性解释。研究发现,医疗保健专业人员,尤其是特马大都会的医疗保健专业人士,在新冠肺炎大流行的早期破坏了患者的某些基本人权。这包括未能向患者提供有关治疗选择和药物潜在风险的信息;在执行医疗程序之前未征求患者的知情同意;拒绝调取病人的医疗档案;以及无法或未能按时向病人提供医疗救护车服务。原创/价值尽管在全球范围内有许多关于新冠肺炎大流行的人权层面和健康保护问题的出版物,但关于新冠肺炎大流行初期个人与医疗保健专业人员的经历的信息仍然很少,特别是在加纳,从患者权利的角度来看。因此,本文填补了医疗管理信息方面的一个重要空白,这对疫情控制时期有关患者权利的政策决策过程至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: nternational Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare (IJHRH) is an international, peer reviewed journal with a unique practical approach to promoting race equality, inclusion and human rights in health and social care. The journal publishes scholarly and double blind peer-reviewed papers of the highest standard, including case studies and book reviews. IJHRH aims include: -To explore what is currently known about discrimination and disadvantage with a particular focus on health and social care -Push the barriers of the human rights discourse by identifying new avenues for healthcare practice and policy internationally -Create bridges between policymakers, practitioners and researchers -Identify and understand the social determinants of health equity and practical interventions to overcome barriers at national and international levels. The journal welcomes papers which use varied approaches, including discussion of theory, comparative studies, systematic evaluation of interventions, analysis of qualitative data and study of health and social care institutions and the political process. Papers published in IJHRH: -Clearly demonstrate the implications of the research -Provide evidence-rich information -Provoke reflection and support critical analysis of both challenges and strengths -Share examples of best practice and ‘what works’, including user perspectives IJHRH is a hugely valuable source of information for researchers, academics, students, practitioners, managers, policy-makers, commissioning bodies, social workers, psychologists, nurses, voluntary sector workers, service users and carers internationally.
期刊最新文献
The assessment of national conduct in realizing the right to heath: using the framework of United Nations Redirecting to sustainable menstrual products – a holistic approach for improving public health Sandstone mining and silicosis deaths in Rajasthan: a critical legal and policy analysis Midwifery students’ perceptions on ethical rights of women using assisted reproductive technologies Improving healthcare for substance users: the moderating role of psychological flexibility on stigma, mental health, and quality of life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1