Contested statehood, complex sovereignty and the European Union's role in Kosovo

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES European Security Pub Date : 2022-11-04 DOI:10.1080/09662839.2022.2138350
Alexandros Lefteratos
{"title":"Contested statehood, complex sovereignty and the European Union's role in Kosovo","authors":"Alexandros Lefteratos","doi":"10.1080/09662839.2022.2138350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The emergence, longevity and resilience of contested states have redefined the relationship between sovereignty and territoriality. While fully-fledged states uphold the monopoly of authority, contested states seek to rewrite the sovereignty playbook and gain a seat among sovereign equals. This atypical antagonism, propped up by post-Westphalian statehood aspirations, has changed the way sovereignty is perceived and understood nowadays. Approaching sovereignty as multi-faceted, this article discusses contested statehood in the context of the EU's engagement overseas. Drawing on the literature of Europeanisation and complex sovereignty, it accounts for the influence of contested statehood on the EU's role and policies in contested states. Specifically, by delving into Kosovo's complex sovereignty (internal/external), the analysis measures the fluctuating impact of contestedness on the EU's employed policy frameworks and deployed crisis management tools unfolding a paradox that has defined the EU's foreign policy in Kosovo for years.","PeriodicalId":46331,"journal":{"name":"European Security","volume":"32 1","pages":"294 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Security","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2138350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The emergence, longevity and resilience of contested states have redefined the relationship between sovereignty and territoriality. While fully-fledged states uphold the monopoly of authority, contested states seek to rewrite the sovereignty playbook and gain a seat among sovereign equals. This atypical antagonism, propped up by post-Westphalian statehood aspirations, has changed the way sovereignty is perceived and understood nowadays. Approaching sovereignty as multi-faceted, this article discusses contested statehood in the context of the EU's engagement overseas. Drawing on the literature of Europeanisation and complex sovereignty, it accounts for the influence of contested statehood on the EU's role and policies in contested states. Specifically, by delving into Kosovo's complex sovereignty (internal/external), the analysis measures the fluctuating impact of contestedness on the EU's employed policy frameworks and deployed crisis management tools unfolding a paradox that has defined the EU's foreign policy in Kosovo for years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有争议的国家地位、复杂的主权和欧洲联盟在科索沃的作用
摘要有争议国家的出现、延续和恢复力重新定义了主权和领土之间的关系。当成熟的国家维护权威垄断时,有争议的国家则试图改写主权战术,在主权平等国家中获得一席之地。这种非典型的对抗,由后威斯特伐利亚州的愿望支撑,改变了当今人们对主权的看法和理解。本文将主权视为多方面的,讨论了欧盟在海外参与的背景下有争议的国家地位。它借鉴了欧洲化和复杂主权的文献,解释了有争议的国家地位对欧盟在有争议国家的作用和政策的影响。具体而言,通过深入研究科索沃复杂的主权(内部/外部),该分析衡量了争议对欧盟所采用的政策框架和部署的危机管理工具的波动影响,这一矛盾多年来一直定义着欧盟在科索沃的外交政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Security
European Security Multiple-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Upon entering NATO: explaining defence willingness among Swedes Instrumentalisation of fear and securitisation of “Eastern Borders Route”: the case of Poland-Belarus “border crisis” Serbia between East and West: ontological security, vicarious identity and the problem of sanctions against Russia External, non-governmental resistance in relation to interstate war: an analytical framework Improved conceptualising of hybrid interference below the threshold of armed conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1