3D printed guide template used in osteotomy for malunion of tibial fracture

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the personalized 3D printed guide template used in the osteotomy for malunion of tibial fracture. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of the 30 patients who had been treated for malunion of tibial fracture at Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital to Zhengzhou University from January 2010 to January 2018. Of them, 15 used a personalized 3D printed guide template in the osteotomy (3D printing group). They were 9 males and 6 females, with an age of 46.3 year±8.2 years. The fracture malunion was located in the upper and middle tibia in 11 cases, in the lower tibia in 4 cases, on the left side in 6 cases and on the right side in 9 ones. There were 8 cases of varus deformity and 7 ones of valgus deformity. Their preoperative fracture deformity angle was 24.3°±5.5°. The other 15 patients were treated with conventional surgery (conventional group). They were 10 males and 5 females, with an age of 47.1 years±6.0 years. The fracture was located in the upper and middle tibia in 12 cases, in the lower tibia in 3 cases, on the left side in 5 cases and on right side in 10 cases. There were 7 cases of varus deformity and 8 ones of valgus deformity. Their preoperative fracture deformity angle was 22.5°±5.4°. The 2 groups were compared in terms of preoperative baseline data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative recovery of the alignment of lower limb. Results There were no significant differences in the preoperative baseline data between the 2 groups, showing comparability (P>0.05). The 3D printing group was followed up for an average of 12 months while the conventional group for an average of 10 months. The operation time for the 3D printing group was significantly shorter than that for the conventional group(102.2 min±13.0 min versus 137.9 min ±10.5 min), the intraoperative blood loss for the former significantly less than that for the latter (77.3 mL ± 39.7 mL versus 163.3 mL ± 35.2 mL), and the postoperative malunion angle in the former significantly smaller than that in the latter (1.9°±0.4° versus 3.2°±0.9°) (all P< 0.05). The last follow-ups revealed no implant failure or re-malunion but fine healing of the osteotomy sites and good recovery of the alignment of lower limb in the 2 groups. Conclusion A personalized 3D printed guide template used in the osteotomy for malunion of tibial fracture is an effective aid because it can facilitate precise osteotomy, reduce operation time and intraoperative blood loss and help correct the alignment of lower limb, leading to good short-term surgical outcomes. Key words: Tibial fracture; Fractures, ununited; Osteotomy; Malunion; 3D printing technology; 3D printing relay template