Charles W. Morris on truth. Towards a semiotically oriented epistemology

Remo Gramigna
{"title":"Charles W. Morris on truth. Towards a semiotically oriented epistemology","authors":"Remo Gramigna","doi":"10.11606/issn.1980-4016.esse.2022.194348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Truth is a very complex phenomenon that has exercised a fascination upon the human mind for millennia. Discussion on truth and falsehood goes back to the earliest day of philosophy and has continued ever since. Semiotics, as an independent discipline, has shown some interest towards this subject, although the research conducted in this field has been scant. This paper focuses on one aspect of this issue for it discusses the semiotic conception of truth in Charles Morris’ work. The reasons for this proposal are threefold. Firstly, in Sign, Language, and Behavior (1946), Morris tackles at length the problem of truth from a semiotic perspective. He offers a thorough and very technical account of truth that lays down the theoretical underpinnings for addressing this issue from a semiotic stance. Secondly, Morris develops an interesting yet overlooked conceptual apparatus. He introduced a precise and lucid set of semiotic distinction of the terms such as ‘truth, ‘adequacy’, ‘reliability’, ‘belief’ and ‘knowledge’ as applied to signs, which all deserve close scrutiny. One of Morris’ merits was to underscore that when such terms are applied to the study of signs, they must be kept distinct for they are independent terms. Thirdly, Morris’ theory of truth deserves attention because it has been almost neglected in contemporary semiotics. Thus, the goal of this study is to rework Morris’ stance on the subject, review the main theoretical distinctions that Morris formulated in regard to the semiotic conception of truth, and to discuss whether this pragmatic account on truth is still applicable today.","PeriodicalId":30062,"journal":{"name":"Estudos Semioticos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos Semioticos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1980-4016.esse.2022.194348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Truth is a very complex phenomenon that has exercised a fascination upon the human mind for millennia. Discussion on truth and falsehood goes back to the earliest day of philosophy and has continued ever since. Semiotics, as an independent discipline, has shown some interest towards this subject, although the research conducted in this field has been scant. This paper focuses on one aspect of this issue for it discusses the semiotic conception of truth in Charles Morris’ work. The reasons for this proposal are threefold. Firstly, in Sign, Language, and Behavior (1946), Morris tackles at length the problem of truth from a semiotic perspective. He offers a thorough and very technical account of truth that lays down the theoretical underpinnings for addressing this issue from a semiotic stance. Secondly, Morris develops an interesting yet overlooked conceptual apparatus. He introduced a precise and lucid set of semiotic distinction of the terms such as ‘truth, ‘adequacy’, ‘reliability’, ‘belief’ and ‘knowledge’ as applied to signs, which all deserve close scrutiny. One of Morris’ merits was to underscore that when such terms are applied to the study of signs, they must be kept distinct for they are independent terms. Thirdly, Morris’ theory of truth deserves attention because it has been almost neglected in contemporary semiotics. Thus, the goal of this study is to rework Morris’ stance on the subject, review the main theoretical distinctions that Morris formulated in regard to the semiotic conception of truth, and to discuss whether this pragmatic account on truth is still applicable today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
查尔斯·w·莫里斯谈真理。朝向符号学导向的认识论
真理是一种非常复杂的现象,几千年来一直在人类的头脑中发挥着魅力。关于真理与谬误的讨论可以追溯到哲学的早期,并一直持续到现在。符号学作为一门独立的学科,对这一主题表现出了一定的兴趣,尽管在这一领域进行的研究还很少。本文从这一问题的一个方面探讨莫里斯作品中的符号学真理观。提出这一建议的理由有三点。首先,在1946年出版的《符号、语言和行为》一书中,莫里斯从符号学的角度详细论述了真理问题。他提供了一个彻底的和非常技术性的真理的描述,奠定了从符号学的立场来解决这个问题的理论基础。其次,莫里斯开发了一个有趣但被忽视的概念工具。他引入了一套精确而清晰的符号学区分术语,如“真理”、“充分性”、“可靠性”、“信念”和“知识”,这些术语都适用于符号,值得仔细研究。莫里斯的优点之一是强调,当这些术语应用于符号研究时,它们必须保持不同,因为它们是独立的术语。第三,莫里斯的真理理论值得关注,因为它在当代符号学中几乎被忽视了。因此,本研究的目的是重新审视莫里斯在这个问题上的立场,回顾莫里斯关于真理的符号学概念所形成的主要理论区别,并讨论这种关于真理的语用解释今天是否仍然适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The founder and his brand: plastic semiotics, semi-symbolism, and the amalgamation of corporate and private identities in the anti-ageing wellness market The conditions of motivation of signs according to the semi-symbolic system QUE SONT MES « SEMI -» DEVENUS ? A identidade material em A solidão de um quadrinho sem fim Entre a semiótica e a montanha
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1