Awake focussed craniotomy for oedematous/large brain lesions

J. Bajaj, Sharad Sharma, G. Maravi, A. Iqbal, Y. Yadav, A. Shrivastava, Ketan Hedaoo, Ambuj Kumar, Mallika Sinha, Shailendra Ratre, V. Parihar, Narayan M. Swamy
{"title":"Awake focussed craniotomy for oedematous/large brain lesions","authors":"J. Bajaj, Sharad Sharma, G. Maravi, A. Iqbal, Y. Yadav, A. Shrivastava, Ketan Hedaoo, Ambuj Kumar, Mallika Sinha, Shailendra Ratre, V. Parihar, Narayan M. Swamy","doi":"10.33962/roneuro-2021-051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Awake craniotomy has been proven to be safe and effective. It has generally been used for non-edematous conditions. If done in edematous states, large craniotomies are advised. Here, we report the combined use of techniques of awake anaesthesia and focussed craniotomy for dealing with large/edematous brain lesions.\nMaterials and Methods: This was a prospective single-centre study from May to October 2019. Included were adult cooperative patients presenting with edematous brain lesions. A completely awake cycle was used using ring scalp block, Dexmedetomidine loading, and maintenance infusion, and use of Midazolam and Fentanyl. The dural flap was lifted limited to the lesion, and sometimes in stages to tackle the bulging brain. Data was collected for resection volume, pain scores using visual analogue scale (VAS) during the surgery, seizures, complications, new deficits, blood loss, duration of surgery, ICU, and postoperative hospital stay.\nResults: Fifteen patients underwent the procedure. Pathologies were high-grade gliomas (7), low-grade gliomas (3), tuberculoma (2), metastasis (1), ependymoma (1), and meningioma (1). Fourteen patients underwent total, and one underwent subtotal excision. Brain bulge could be handled with the staged opening of the dura and intratumoral decompression. No patient required postoperative ventilatory support. Intraoperative pain scores ranged from 2-3. The duration of surgery ranged from 60-280min. Blood loss ranged from 75-300ml. Postoperative stay varied from 3-20 days. There were two intraoperative seizures (managed), two CSF leaks, and two infections. Two patients developed transitory motor deficits.\nConclusion: Awake focussed craniotomy was found safe and effective for large/edematous brain lesions in appropriately selected patients.","PeriodicalId":30188,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33962/roneuro-2021-051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: Awake craniotomy has been proven to be safe and effective. It has generally been used for non-edematous conditions. If done in edematous states, large craniotomies are advised. Here, we report the combined use of techniques of awake anaesthesia and focussed craniotomy for dealing with large/edematous brain lesions. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective single-centre study from May to October 2019. Included were adult cooperative patients presenting with edematous brain lesions. A completely awake cycle was used using ring scalp block, Dexmedetomidine loading, and maintenance infusion, and use of Midazolam and Fentanyl. The dural flap was lifted limited to the lesion, and sometimes in stages to tackle the bulging brain. Data was collected for resection volume, pain scores using visual analogue scale (VAS) during the surgery, seizures, complications, new deficits, blood loss, duration of surgery, ICU, and postoperative hospital stay. Results: Fifteen patients underwent the procedure. Pathologies were high-grade gliomas (7), low-grade gliomas (3), tuberculoma (2), metastasis (1), ependymoma (1), and meningioma (1). Fourteen patients underwent total, and one underwent subtotal excision. Brain bulge could be handled with the staged opening of the dura and intratumoral decompression. No patient required postoperative ventilatory support. Intraoperative pain scores ranged from 2-3. The duration of surgery ranged from 60-280min. Blood loss ranged from 75-300ml. Postoperative stay varied from 3-20 days. There were two intraoperative seizures (managed), two CSF leaks, and two infections. Two patients developed transitory motor deficits. Conclusion: Awake focussed craniotomy was found safe and effective for large/edematous brain lesions in appropriately selected patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
清醒聚焦开颅术治疗水肿/大面积脑病变
目的:Awake开颅术已被证明是安全有效的。它通常用于非水肿性疾病。如果在水肿状态下进行,建议进行大型开颅手术。在这里,我们报告了清醒麻醉和集中开颅术联合使用来处理大面积/水肿性脑损伤。材料和方法:这是一项2019年5月至10月的前瞻性单中心研究。包括出现水肿性脑损伤的成年合作患者。使用环形头皮阻滞、右美托咪定负荷、维持输注以及使用咪唑安定和芬太尼进行完全清醒周期。硬脑膜瓣仅限于病变部位提起,有时分阶段提起以处理隆起的大脑。收集了切除量、手术过程中使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)的疼痛评分、癫痫发作、并发症、新缺陷、失血、手术持续时间、ICU和术后住院时间的数据。结果:15例患者接受了手术。病理学表现为高级别胶质瘤(7)、低级别神经胶质瘤(3)、结核瘤(2)、转移瘤(1)、室管膜瘤(1)和脑膜瘤(1)。共有14名患者接受了手术,其中1名接受了次全切除术。脑膨出可以通过分阶段开放硬脑膜和肿瘤内减压来处理。没有患者需要术后通气支持。术中疼痛评分在2-3分之间。手术时间为60-280分钟。失血量在75-300ml之间。术后停留时间为3-20天。有两次术中癫痫发作(得到控制),两次脑脊液漏,两次感染。两名患者出现短暂性运动功能障碍。结论:在适当选择的患者中,清醒聚焦开颅术对大面积/水肿性脑损伤是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Similarities and differences between two coincidently gravitational bullet cases Role of extent of resection on the survival of glioblastoma multiforme Management of brain aneurysm neck-avulsion during clipping surgery A giant A4-A5 distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysm treated with microsurgical clip reconstruction Sellar hematoma as a new potential radiological clue for superior hypophyseal artery aneurysm rupture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1