The dynamic trade-off theory of capital structure: evidence from a panel of US industrial companies

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Studies in Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1108/sef-04-2023-0200
Ridha Esghaier
{"title":"The dynamic trade-off theory of capital structure: evidence from a panel of US industrial companies","authors":"Ridha Esghaier","doi":"10.1108/sef-04-2023-0200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to test the empirical validity of the dynamic trade-off theory in its symmetric and asymmetric versions in explaining the capital structure of a panel of publicly listed US industrial firms over the period from 2013 to 2019. It analyzes the existence of an adjustment of leverage toward its target level and whether the speed of this adjustment is influenced by the debt measure, the model specification or/and the fact that the actual debt ratio is higher or lower than its long-term target level.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper uses a quantitative research methodology using panel data analysis under the partial adjustment model and the error correction model using the generalized moment method in first differences and in systems to explore the dynamic nature of firms’ capital structure behavior.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that the effects of the conventional determinants of leverage are globally consistent with the trade-off theory predictions. The dynamic versions confirm that firms exhibit leverage-targeting behavior. Although this speed of adjustment (SOA) depends on the debt and model specifications, it is around 60% on average. The estimated SOA is higher for the market leverage measure compared to the book leverage. The asymmetric adjustment model reveals that firms are more sensitive to reducing leverage than increasing it when they are away from their target; overleveraged firms exhibit approximately 5% faster adjustment than underleveraged firms when book leverage is used.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe originality of this research paper lies in its development and test of an asymmetric model to allow the leverage adjustment speed to vary depending on whether the firm’s debt ratio is above or below its target level and the methodological approach as well as the different model specifications used and the insights generated through the application of rigorous econometric techniques.\n","PeriodicalId":45607,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-04-2023-0200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to test the empirical validity of the dynamic trade-off theory in its symmetric and asymmetric versions in explaining the capital structure of a panel of publicly listed US industrial firms over the period from 2013 to 2019. It analyzes the existence of an adjustment of leverage toward its target level and whether the speed of this adjustment is influenced by the debt measure, the model specification or/and the fact that the actual debt ratio is higher or lower than its long-term target level. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a quantitative research methodology using panel data analysis under the partial adjustment model and the error correction model using the generalized moment method in first differences and in systems to explore the dynamic nature of firms’ capital structure behavior. Findings The results show that the effects of the conventional determinants of leverage are globally consistent with the trade-off theory predictions. The dynamic versions confirm that firms exhibit leverage-targeting behavior. Although this speed of adjustment (SOA) depends on the debt and model specifications, it is around 60% on average. The estimated SOA is higher for the market leverage measure compared to the book leverage. The asymmetric adjustment model reveals that firms are more sensitive to reducing leverage than increasing it when they are away from their target; overleveraged firms exhibit approximately 5% faster adjustment than underleveraged firms when book leverage is used. Originality/value The originality of this research paper lies in its development and test of an asymmetric model to allow the leverage adjustment speed to vary depending on whether the firm’s debt ratio is above or below its target level and the methodological approach as well as the different model specifications used and the insights generated through the application of rigorous econometric techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资本结构的动态权衡理论——来自美国工业企业的实证研究
目的本文旨在检验对称和非对称动态权衡理论在解释2013年至2019年美国上市工业企业资本结构时的实证有效性。它分析了杠杆率是否向其目标水平调整,以及这种调整的速度是否受到债务计量、模型规范或/或实际负债率高于或低于其长期目标水平的事实的影响。设计/方法论/方法本文采用了一种定量研究方法,在部分调整模型下使用面板数据分析,在第一差分和系统中使用广义矩方法的误差修正模型,来探索企业资本结构行为的动态性质。研究结果表明,传统杠杆决定因素的影响与权衡理论的预测是全局一致的。动态版本证实了企业表现出杠杆瞄准行为。尽管这种调整速度(SOA)取决于债务和模型规范,但平均约为60%。与账面杠杆相比,市场杠杆衡量的SOA估计值更高。不对称调整模型表明,当企业偏离目标时,它们对降低杠杆比增加杠杆更敏感;当使用账面杠杆时,杠杆率过高的公司比杠杆率过低的公司表现出大约5%的调整速度。独创性/价值这篇研究论文的独创性在于它开发和测试了一个不对称模型,该模型允许杠杆调整速度根据公司的负债率是高于还是低于其目标水平而变化,方法论方法以及使用的不同模型规范和通过应用严格的计量经济学产生的见解技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Topics addressed in the journal include: ■corporate finance, ■financial markets, ■money and banking, ■international finance and economics, ■investments, ■risk management, ■theory of the firm, ■competition policy, ■corporate governance.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling exogenous shocks, financial stress and US economic performance Influence of Ukrainian refugees on the exchange rate and stock market in neighboring countries How do commodity futures respond to Ukraine–Russia, Taiwan Strait and Hamas–Israel crises? – An analysis using event study approach How do commodity futures respond to Ukraine–Russia, Taiwan Strait and Hamas–Israel crises? – An analysis using event study approach The ups and downs of oil prices: asymmetric impacts of oil price volatility on corporate environmental responsibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1