Religion in context: History and Policy in Hume's Natural History of Religion

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY Journal of Scottish Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.3366/jsp.2022.0319
Hannah Lingier
{"title":"Religion in context: History and Policy in Hume's Natural History of Religion","authors":"Hannah Lingier","doi":"10.3366/jsp.2022.0319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hume's Natural History of Religion is generally regarded as a reductionist project, in which religion is traced to its universal natural roots in the passions and imagination. This interpretation neglects: (1) Hume's view that humankind is social by nature, which implies that any naturalist explanation of religion cannot appeal to facts about individual minds alone, and (2) Hume's interest in religion as it concerns religion's effects on morality and society, effects that occur within socio-historical contexts. Religion is generated out of universal propensities, in response to the particular needs and values of communities. Both these aspects are relevant for religious policy. Hume's naturalist approach helps explain problems that attend religion, but questions about how to address these problems as they arise in particular cultures can be answered only in context. The salutary effects of toleration, for example, are not guaranteed at all times and places. The Natural History nevertheless urges the reader towards a tolerant mindset by exposing religion's universality as well as its diversity, and the moral importance of acknowledging both.","PeriodicalId":41417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scottish Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scottish Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/jsp.2022.0319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hume's Natural History of Religion is generally regarded as a reductionist project, in which religion is traced to its universal natural roots in the passions and imagination. This interpretation neglects: (1) Hume's view that humankind is social by nature, which implies that any naturalist explanation of religion cannot appeal to facts about individual minds alone, and (2) Hume's interest in religion as it concerns religion's effects on morality and society, effects that occur within socio-historical contexts. Religion is generated out of universal propensities, in response to the particular needs and values of communities. Both these aspects are relevant for religious policy. Hume's naturalist approach helps explain problems that attend religion, but questions about how to address these problems as they arise in particular cultures can be answered only in context. The salutary effects of toleration, for example, are not guaranteed at all times and places. The Natural History nevertheless urges the reader towards a tolerant mindset by exposing religion's universality as well as its diversity, and the moral importance of acknowledging both.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语境中的宗教:休谟宗教自然史中的历史与政策
休谟的《宗教自然史》通常被认为是一个简化主义的项目,其中宗教被追溯到其普遍的自然根源,即激情和想象。这种解释忽略了:(1)休谟关于人类本质上是社会性的观点,这意味着任何自然主义的宗教解释都不能仅仅诉诸于个人思想的事实;(2)休谟对宗教的兴趣,因为它涉及宗教对道德和社会的影响,这种影响发生在社会历史背景下。宗教产生于普遍的倾向,是对社会的特殊需要和价值的回应。这两个方面都与宗教政策有关。休谟的自然主义方法有助于解释与宗教有关的问题,但如何解决这些在特定文化中出现的问题,只能在语境中回答。例如,并不是在任何时候、任何地点都能保证宽容的有益效果。然而,《自然史》通过揭露宗教的普遍性和多样性,以及承认两者的道德重要性,敦促读者养成宽容的心态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Maximalising Providence: Samuel Rutherford's Augustinian Transformation of Scotist Scholasticism Archibald Pitcairne and the Newtonian Turn of Medical Philosophy Robert Balfour and William Chalmers on the Essence, Existence and Aptness of Accidents New Studies on Seventeenth-Century Scottish Philosophy Direct or Indirect Scotism? Seventeenth-Century Scottish Scholasticism and the Case of James Sibbald (1595–1647)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1